Therezia Bokor-Billmann1, Ewan A Langan2, Franck Billmann3. 1. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 3. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: Franck.Billmann@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although the collection of race and/or ethnicity data is an important way to identify and address inequalities in health care provision and disparities in access to treatment, studies examining the extent to which race and/or ethnicity data are reported in the medical literature, and the quality of these data, are lacking. Therefore, we sought to objectively determine the quality of reporting of race and/or ethnicity in original medical research papers. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective bibliometric analysis was used. Two independent investigators analyzed original articles investigating race/ethnicity, published between 2007 and 2018, in the 10 top-ranking academic journals in each of the following categories: general medicine, surgery, and oncology. RESULTS: A total of 995 original articles were included in our analysis. Only 45 studies (4.52%) provided a formal definition of race/ethnicity, and 8.94% identified the investigator responsible for the classification. While race/ethnicity was a key part of study design in 31.86% of the included investigations, the method used to classify individuals into racial/ethnic groups was described in only 10.25% of articles. In terms of terminology, we identified 81 different race/ethnicity classifications, but these were often imprecise and open to interpretation. CONCLUSION: There is significant room for improvement in the collection, reporting, and publishing of data describing ethnicity and/or race in the medical literature.
OBJECTIVES: Although the collection of race and/or ethnicity data is an important way to identify and address inequalities in health care provision and disparities in access to treatment, studies examining the extent to which race and/or ethnicity data are reported in the medical literature, and the quality of these data, are lacking. Therefore, we sought to objectively determine the quality of reporting of race and/or ethnicity in original medical research papers. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective bibliometric analysis was used. Two independent investigators analyzed original articles investigating race/ethnicity, published between 2007 and 2018, in the 10 top-ranking academic journals in each of the following categories: general medicine, surgery, and oncology. RESULTS: A total of 995 original articles were included in our analysis. Only 45 studies (4.52%) provided a formal definition of race/ethnicity, and 8.94% identified the investigator responsible for the classification. While race/ethnicity was a key part of study design in 31.86% of the included investigations, the method used to classify individuals into racial/ethnic groups was described in only 10.25% of articles. In terms of terminology, we identified 81 different race/ethnicity classifications, but these were often imprecise and open to interpretation. CONCLUSION: There is significant room for improvement in the collection, reporting, and publishing of data describing ethnicity and/or race in the medical literature.
Authors: Lucy C Barker; Neesha Hussain-Shamsy; Kanya Lakshmi Rajendra; Susan E Bronskill; Hilary K Brown; Paul Kurdyak; Simone N Vigod Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 4.519
Authors: Ming Jie Lee; Luke Blagdon Snell; Sam T Douthwaite; Sarah Fidler; Naomi Fitzgerald; Lynsey Goodwin; Lisa Hamzah; Ranjababu Kulasegaram; Sarah Lawrence; Julianne Lwanga; Rebecca Marchant; Chloe Orkin; Adrian Palfreeman; Padmini Parthasarathi; Manish Pareek; Kyle Ring; Hamed Sharaf; Eleanor Shekarchi-Khanghahi; Rebecca Simons; Jhia Jiat Teh; John Thornhill; Clare van Halsema; Marie Williamson; Martin Wiselka; Achyuta Nori; Julie Fox; Colette Smith Journal: HIV Med Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 3.094
Authors: Sara C Buttery; Keir E J Philip; Saeed M Alghamdi; Parris J Williams; Jennifer K Quint; Nicholas S Hopkinson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 3.006