Anne C Goldberg1, Lawrence A Leiter2, Erik S G Stroes3, Seth J Baum4, Jeffrey C Hanselman5, LeAnne T Bloedon5, Narendra D Lalwani5, Pragna M Patel5, Xin Zhao5,6, P Barton Duell7. 1. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 2. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Preventive Cardiology Inc, Boca Raton, Florida. 5. Esperion Therapeutics Inc, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Currently with Corestat Inc, Ithaca, New York. 7. Center for Preventive Cardiology, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Abstract
Importance: Additional treatment options are needed for patients who do not achieve sufficient reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level with available lipid-lowering therapies. Objective: To assess the efficacy of bempedoic acid vs placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 91 clinical sites in North America and Europe from November 2016 to September 2018, with a final date of follow-up of September 22, 2018. A total of 779 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, or both met randomization criteria, which included LDL-C level 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) or greater while receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to treatment with bempedoic acid (180 mg) (n = 522) or placebo (n = 257) once daily for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percent change from baseline in LDL-C level at week 12. Secondary measures included changes in levels of lipids, lipoproteins, and biomarkers. Results: Among 779 randomized patients (mean age, 64.3 years; 283 women [36.3%]), 740 (95.0%) completed the trial. At baseline, mean LDL-C level was 120.4 (SD, 37.9) mg/dL. Bempedoic acid lowered LDL-C levels significantly more than placebo at week 12 (-15.1% vs 2.4%, respectively; difference, -17.4% [95% CI, -21.0% to -13.9%]; P < .001). Significant reductions with bempedoic acid vs placebo were observed at week 12 for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-10.8% vs 2.3%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.3% to -9.8%]; P < .001), total cholesterol (-9.9% vs 1.3%; difference, -11.2% [95% CI, -13.6% to -8.8%]; P < .001), apolipoprotein B (-9.3% vs 3.7%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.1% to -9.9%]; P < .001), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (median, -18.7% vs -9.4%; difference, -8.7% [asymptotic confidence limits, -17.2% to -0.4%]; P = .04). Common adverse events included nasopharyngitis (5.2% vs 5.1% with bempedoic acid and placebo, respectively), urinary tract infection (5.0% vs 1.9%), and hyperuricemia (4.2% vs 1.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated statins, the addition of bempedoic acid compared with placebo resulted in a significant lowering of LDL-C level over 12 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the durability and clinical effect as well as long-term safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02991118.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Additional treatment options are needed for patients who do not achieve sufficient reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level with available lipid-lowering therapies. Objective: To assess the efficacy of bempedoic acid vs placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 91 clinical sites in North America and Europe from November 2016 to September 2018, with a final date of follow-up of September 22, 2018. A total of 779 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, or both met randomization criteria, which included LDL-C level 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) or greater while receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to treatment with bempedoic acid (180 mg) (n = 522) or placebo (n = 257) once daily for 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percent change from baseline in LDL-C level at week 12. Secondary measures included changes in levels of lipids, lipoproteins, and biomarkers. Results: Among 779 randomized patients (mean age, 64.3 years; 283 women [36.3%]), 740 (95.0%) completed the trial. At baseline, mean LDL-C level was 120.4 (SD, 37.9) mg/dL. Bempedoic acid lowered LDL-C levels significantly more than placebo at week 12 (-15.1% vs 2.4%, respectively; difference, -17.4% [95% CI, -21.0% to -13.9%]; P < .001). Significant reductions with bempedoic acid vs placebo were observed at week 12 for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-10.8% vs 2.3%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.3% to -9.8%]; P < .001), total cholesterol (-9.9% vs 1.3%; difference, -11.2% [95% CI, -13.6% to -8.8%]; P < .001), apolipoprotein B (-9.3% vs 3.7%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.1% to -9.9%]; P < .001), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (median, -18.7% vs -9.4%; difference, -8.7% [asymptotic confidence limits, -17.2% to -0.4%]; P = .04). Common adverse events included nasopharyngitis (5.2% vs 5.1% with bempedoic acid and placebo, respectively), urinary tract infection (5.0% vs 1.9%), and hyperuricemia (4.2% vs 1.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated statins, the addition of bempedoic acid compared with placebo resulted in a significant lowering of LDL-C level over 12 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the durability and clinical effect as well as long-term safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02991118.
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson; Karen M Eddleman; Nicole M Jarrett; Ken LaBresh; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Emil M deGoma; Zahid S Ahmad; Emily C O'Brien; Iris Kindt; Peter Shrader; Connie B Newman; Yashashwi Pokharel; Seth J Baum; Linda C Hemphill; Lisa C Hudgins; Catherine D Ahmed; Samuel S Gidding; Danielle Duffy; William Neal; Katherine Wilemon; Matthew T Roe; Daniel J Rader; Christie M Ballantyne; MacRae F Linton; P Barton Duell; Michael D Shapiro; Patrick M Moriarty; Joshua W Knowles Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2016-03-24
Authors: Leopoldo Perez de Isla; Rodrigo Alonso; Gerald F Watts; Nelva Mata; Adriana Saltijeral Cerezo; Ovidio Muñiz; Francisco Fuentes; José Luís Diaz-Diaz; Raimundo de Andrés; Daniel Zambón; Patricia Rubio-Marin; Miguel A Barba-Romero; Pedro Saenz; Juan F Sanchez Muñoz-Torrero; Ceferino Martinez-Faedo; José P Miramontes-Gonzalez; Lina Badimón; Pedro Mata Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christie M Ballantyne; Maciej Banach; G B John Mancini; Norman E Lepor; Jeffrey C Hanselman; Xin Zhao; Lawrence A Leiter Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Michael G Silverman; Brian A Ference; Kyungah Im; Stephen D Wiviott; Robert P Giugliano; Scott M Grundy; Eugene Braunwald; Marc S Sabatine Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joseph Menzin; Jyoti Aggarwal; Brian Boatman; Jeffrey Yu; Kevin Stern; David J Harrison; Jeetvan G Patel Journal: J Manag Care Spec Pharm Date: 2017-09-25
Authors: Brian A Ference; Kausik K Ray; Alberico L Catapano; Thatcher B Ference; Stephen Burgess; David R Neff; Clare Oliver-Williams; Angela M Wood; Adam S Butterworth; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; John Danesh; John J P Kastelein; Stephen J Nicholls Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Stephen L Pinkosky; Roger S Newton; Emily A Day; Rebecca J Ford; Sarka Lhotak; Richard C Austin; Carolyn M Birch; Brennan K Smith; Sergey Filippov; Pieter H E Groot; Gregory R Steinberg; Narendra D Lalwani Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Stephen J Nicholls; Steven E Nissen; Francesco Prati; Stephan Windecker; Yu Kataoka; Rishi Puri; Thomas Hucko; Helina Kassahun; Jason Liao; Ransi Somaratne; Julie Butters; Giuseppe Di Giovanni; Stephen Jones; Peter J Psaltis Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-02