Literature DB >> 31714734

Volume Adaptation Controls Stem Cell Mechanotransduction.

Luke G Major1, Andrew W Holle2,3, Jennifer L Young2,3, Matt S Hepburn4,5, Kwanghee Jeong6, Ian L Chin1, Rowan W Sanderson4,5, Ji Hoon Jeong7, Zachary M Aman6, Brendan F Kennedy4,5,8, Yongsung Hwang7, Dong-Wook Han9, Hyun Woo Park10, Kun-Liang Guan11, Joachim P Spatz2,3, Yu Suk Choi1.   

Abstract

Recent studies have found discordant mechanosensitive outcomes when comparing 2D and 3D, highlighting the need for tools to study mechanotransduction in 3D across a wide spectrum of stiffness. A gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel with a continuous stiffness gradient ranging from 5 to 38 kPa was developed to recapitulate physiological stiffness conditions. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) were encapsulated in this hydrogel, and their morphological characteristics and expression of both mechanosensitive proteins (Lamin A, YAP, and MRTFa) and differentiation markers (PPARγ and RUNX2) were analyzed. Low-stiffness regions (∼8 kPa) permitted increased cellular and nuclear volume and enhanced mechanosensitive protein localization in the nucleus. This trend was reversed in high stiffness regions (∼30 kPa), where decreased cellular and nuclear volumes and reduced mechanosensitive protein nuclear localization were observed. Interestingly, cells in soft regions exhibited enhanced osteogenic RUNX2 expression, while those in stiff regions upregulated the adipogenic regulator PPARγ, suggesting that volume, not substrate stiffness, is sufficient to drive 3D stem cell differentiation. Inhibition of myosin II (Blebbistatin) and ROCK (Y-27632), both key drivers of actomyosin contractility, resulted in reduced cell volume, especially in low-stiffness regions, causing a decorrelation between volume expansion and mechanosensitive protein localization. Constitutively active and inactive forms of the canonical downstream mechanotransduction effector TAZ were stably transfected into ASCs. Activated TAZ resulted in higher cellular volume despite increasing stiffness and a consistent, stiffness-independent translocation of YAP and MRTFa into the nucleus. Thus, volume adaptation as a function of 3D matrix stiffness can control stem cell mechanotransduction and differentiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cellular volume; extracellular matrix; mechanobiology; mechanotransduction; stem cell differentiation; stiffness gradient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31714734     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b19770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  18 in total

1.  Functionally graded biomaterials for use as model systems and replacement tissues.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lowen; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Analysis of strain estimation methods in phase-sensitive compression optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Jiayue Li; Ewelina Pijewska; Qi Fang; Maciej Szkulmowski; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Visible-Light Stiffness Patterning of GelMA Hydrogels Towards In Vitro Scar Tissue Models.

Authors:  Anaïs E Chalard; Alexander W Dixon; Andrew J Taberner; Jenny Malmström
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  Hydrogel Micropost Arrays with Single Post Tunability to Study Cell Volume and Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Daniel Devine; Vishwaarth Vijayakumar; Sing Wan Wong; Stephen Lenzini; Peter Newman; Jae-Won Shin
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2020-10-14

5.  Durotaxis Index of 3T3 Fibroblast Cells Scales with Stiff-to-Soft Membrane Tension Polarity.

Authors:  Yuehua Yang; Kekan Xie; Hongyuan Jiang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Tethering Cells via Enzymatic Oxidative Crosslinking Enables Mechanotransduction in Non-Cell-Adhesive Materials.

Authors:  Tom Kamperman; Sieger Henke; João F Crispim; Niels G A Willemen; Pieter J Dijkstra; Wooje Lee; Herman L Offerhaus; Martin Neubauer; Alexandra M Smink; Paul de Vos; Bart J de Haan; Marcel Karperien; Su Ryon Shin; Jeroen Leijten
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 32.086

7.  Matrix Control of Periodontal Ligament Cell Activity Via Synthetic Hydrogel Scaffolds.

Authors:  David Fraser; Tram Nguyen; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.080

Review 8.  Traction force microscopy for understanding cellular mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Sung Sik Hur; Ji Hoon Jeong; Myung Jin Ban; Jae Hong Park; Jeong Kyo Yoon; Yongsung Hwang
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.778

9.  Matrix stiffness-sensitive long noncoding RNA NEAT1 seeded paraspeckles in cancer cells.

Authors:  Vanja Todorovski; Archa H Fox; Yu Suk Choi
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 10.  Engineering the Cellular Microenvironment of Post-infarct Myocardium on a Chip.

Authors:  Natalie N Khalil; Megan L McCain
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.