Literature DB >> 31714194

Deep Convolutional Neural Network-based Software Improves Radiologist Detection of Malignant Lung Nodules on Chest Radiographs.

Yongsik Sim1, Myung Jin Chung1, Elmar Kotter1, Sehyo Yune1, Myeongchan Kim1, Synho Do1, Kyunghwa Han1, Hanmyoung Kim1, Seungwook Yang1, Dong-Jae Lee1, Byoung Wook Choi1.   

Abstract

Background Multicenter studies are required to validate the added benefit of using deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) software for detecting malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs. Purpose To compare the performance of radiologists in detecting malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs when assisted by deep learning-based DCNN software with that of radiologists or DCNN software alone in a multicenter setting. Materials and Methods Investigators at four medical centers retrospectively identified 600 lung cancer-containing chest radiographs and 200 normal chest radiographs. Each radiograph with a lung cancer had at least one malignant nodule confirmed by CT and pathologic examination. Twelve radiologists from the four centers independently analyzed the chest radiographs and marked regions of interest. Commercially available deep learning-based computer-aided detection software separately trained, tested, and validated with 19 330 radiographs was used to find suspicious nodules. The radiologists then reviewed the images with the assistance of DCNN software. The sensitivity and number of false-positive findings per image of DCNN software, radiologists alone, and radiologists with the use of DCNN software were analyzed by using logistic regression and Poisson regression. Results The average sensitivity of radiologists improved (from 65.1% [1375 of 2112; 95% confidence interval {CI}: 62.0%, 68.1%] to 70.3% [1484 of 2112; 95% CI: 67.2%, 73.1%], P < .001) and the number of false-positive findings per radiograph declined (from 0.2 [488 of 2400; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.22] to 0.18 [422 of 2400; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.2], P < .001) when the radiologists re-reviewed radiographs with the DCNN software. For the 12 radiologists in this study, 104 of 2400 radiographs were positively changed (from false-negative to true-positive or from false-positive to true-negative) using the DCNN, while 56 of 2400 radiographs were changed negatively. Conclusion Radiologists had better performance with deep convolutional network software for the detection of malignant pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs than without. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Jacobson in this issue.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31714194     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  AI-based improvement in lung cancer detection on chest radiographs: results of a multi-reader study in NLST dataset.

Authors:  Hyunsuk Yoo; Sang Hyup Lee; Chiara Daniela Arru; Ruhani Doda Khera; Ramandeep Singh; Sean Siebert; Dohoon Kim; Yuna Lee; Ju Hyun Park; Hye Joung Eom; Subba R Digumarthy; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  A narrative review of deep learning applications in lung cancer research: from screening to prognostication.

Authors:  Jong Hyuk Lee; Eui Jin Hwang; Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06

3.  Research on Online Social Network Information Leakage-Tracking Algorithm Based on Deep Learning.

Authors:  Shuhe Han
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-28

4.  Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence approved for adults for the interpretation of pediatric chest radiographs.

Authors:  Hyun Joo Shin; Nak-Hoon Son; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Performance of Deep Learning and Genitourinary Radiologists in Detection of Prostate Cancer Using 3-T Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ruiming Cao; Xinran Zhong; Sohrab Afshari; Ely Felker; Voraparee Suvannarerg; Teeravut Tubtawee; Sitaram Vangala; Fabien Scalzo; Steven Raman; Kyunghyun Sung
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Rib fracture detection in computed tomography images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Masafumi Kaiume; Shigeru Suzuki; Koichiro Yasaka; Haruto Sugawara; Yun Shen; Yoshiaki Katada; Takuya Ishikawa; Rika Fukui; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Performance of an AI based CAD system in solid lung nodule detection on chest phantom radiographs compared to radiology residents and fellow radiologists.

Authors:  Alan A Peters; Amanda Decasper; Jaro Munz; Jeremias Klaus; Laura I Loebelenz; Maximilian Korbinian Michael Hoffner; Cynthia Hourscht; Johannes T Heverhagen; Andreas Christe; Lukas Ebner
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.005

8.  Computer tomographic differential diagnosis of ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst: classification using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Mayara Simões Bispo; Mário Lúcio Gomes de Queiroz Pierre Júnior; Antônio Lopes Apolinário; Jean Nunes Dos Santos; Braulio Carneiro Junior; Frederico Sampaio Neves; Iêda Crusoé-Rebello
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 9.  Spatial architecture of the immune microenvironment orchestrates tumor immunity and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Tong Fu; Lei-Jie Dai; Song-Yang Wu; Yi Xiao; Ding Ma; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 10.  Applications of artificial intelligence and deep learning in molecular imaging and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hossein Arabi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.