| Literature DB >> 31714140 |
Whatmore M Tagwireyi1, Eric Etter, Luis Neves.
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii is a major neglected parasitic infection occurring in settings of extreme poverty in Africa. Apart from causing reproductive failure in animals it is also a significant zoonotic concern. The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalence and associated risk factors of T. gondii infection in cats, chickens, goats, sheep and pigs in the southeast of South Africa, of which little is known. Sera was obtained from 601 domestic animals including 109 cats, 137 chickens, 128 goats, 121 sheep and 106 pigs managed under different production systems in different agro-ecological regions and evaluated by the Toxoreagent, a latex agglutination test for T. gondii antibody detection. Household-level and animal-level data were collected by interviewing animal owners and/or herders using a closed-ended questionnaire. The study revealed an overall farm seroprevalence of 83.33% (125/150 farms) with the highest rate of infection for the parasite found in sheep with 64.46% (78/121), followed by goats with 53.91% (69/128), pigs with 33.96% (36/106), cats with 32.11% (35/109 cats) and chickens with 33.58% (46/137). The risk factors that were found to be statistically significant (p 0.05) to different species of seropositivites were age, location, climate, animal production system, rodent control, seropositive cat, cat-feed access and cat faecal disposal. The relatively high seroprevalence of T. gondii detected in this region suggests that domestic animals may pose a substantial public health risk through the consumption of T. gondii-infected raw meat as well as via contact with cat faeces.Entities:
Keywords: South Africa; Toxoplasma gondii; domestic animals; latex agglutination test; seroprevalence
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31714140 PMCID: PMC6852261 DOI: 10.4102/ojvr.v86i1.1688
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onderstepoort J Vet Res ISSN: 0030-2465 Impact factor: 1.792
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and statistically significant risk factors in domestic animals in southeastern South Africa (June 2016 – October 2016).
| Species | Prevalence (%) | Risk factors | Chi-squared | Odds ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| True prevalence | 95% CI | |||||
| Cat | 31.62 | 22.89–40.35 | Age | 0.0075 | 3.43 | 0.0044 |
| 2.12–17.75 | Seropositive cat | - | 5.77 | 0.0002 | ||
| Chicken | 33.23 | 25.34–41.12 | Production system | - | 2.90 | 0.015 |
| Goat | 55.63 | 47.02–64.24 | Location | - | - | 0.0014 |
| Sheep | 67.25 | 58.89–75.61 | Age | 0.0468 | 3.45 | 0.018 |
| Location | 0.0186 | - | - | |||
| Cat-feed contact | 0.0460 | 2.30 | 0.037 | |||
| Rodent control | 0.0423 | 6.06 | 0.023 | |||
| Pig | 33.65 | 24.65–42.65 | Climate | 0.0077 | 3.37 | 0.0072 |
| Cat faeces covered with soil | 0.0090 | 0.21 | 0.0085 | |||
| Cat faeces left in the environment | 0.0198 | 5.20 | 0.0163 | |||
CI, confidence interval.
FIGURE 1Geographic distribution of sampled households with sheep (red dots indicate positive test results and black dots indicate negative test results).
FIGURE 2Geographic distribution of sampled households with goats (red dots indicate positive test results and black dots indicate negative test results).