Literature DB >> 31713616

Single molecule analysis of effects of non-canonical guide RNAs and specificity-enhancing mutations on Cas9-induced DNA unwinding.

Ikenna C Okafor1, Digvijay Singh2, Yanbo Wang2, Minhee Jung3, Haobo Wang4, John Mallon4, Scott Bailey2,4, Jungjoon K Lee3, Taekjip Ha2,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Cas9 has made a wide range of genomic manipulation possible. However, its specificity continues to be a challenge. Non-canonical gRNAs and new engineered variants of Cas9 have been developed to improve specificity, but at the cost of the on-target activity. DNA unwinding is a checkpoint before cleavage by Cas9, and was shown to be made more sensitive to sequence mismatches by specificity-enhancing mutations in engineered Cas9s. Here we performed single-molecule FRET-based DNA unwinding experiments using various combinations of non-canonical gRNAs and different Cas9s. All engineered Cas9s were less promiscuous than wild type when canonical gRNA was used, but HypaCas9 had much-reduced on-target unwinding. Cas9-HF1 and eCas9 showed the best balance between low promiscuity and high on-target activity with canonical gRNA. When extended gRNAs with one or two non-matching guanines added to the 5' end were used, Sniper1-Cas9 showed the lowest promiscuity while maintaining high on-target activity. Truncated gRNA generally reduced unwinding and adding a non-matching guanine to the 5' end of gRNA influenced unwinding in a sequence-context dependent manner. Our results are consistent with cell-based cleavage data and provide a mechanistic understanding of how various Cas9/gRNA combinations perform in genome engineering.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31713616      PMCID: PMC7145707          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  37 in total

1.  Probing the interaction between two single molecules: fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a single donor and a single acceptor.

Authors:  T Ha; T Enderle; D F Ogletree; D S Chemla; P R Selvin; S Weiss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and Forward.

Authors:  Frank Hille; Hagen Richter; Shi Pey Wong; Majda Bratovič; Sarah Ressel; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes.

Authors:  Jeffry D Sander; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nishimasu; F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Silvana Konermann; Soraya I Shehata; Naoshi Dohmae; Ryuichiro Ishitani; Feng Zhang; Osamu Nureki
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Direct observation of R-loop formation by single RNA-guided Cas9 and Cascade effector complexes.

Authors:  Mark D Szczelkun; Maria S Tikhomirova; Tomas Sinkunas; Giedrius Gasiunas; Tautvydas Karvelis; Patrizia Pschera; Virginijus Siksnys; Ralf Seidel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Samuel H Sternberg; Benjamin LaFrance; Matias Kaplan; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Vikram Pattanayak; Michelle S Prew; Shengdar Q Tsai; Nhu T Nguyen; Zongli Zheng; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity.

Authors:  Johnny H Hu; Shannon M Miller; Maarten H Geurts; Weixin Tang; Liwei Chen; Ning Sun; Christina M Zeina; Xue Gao; Holly A Rees; Zhi Lin; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Directed evolution of CRISPR-Cas9 to increase its specificity.

Authors:  Jungjoon K Lee; Euihwan Jeong; Joonsun Lee; Minhee Jung; Eunji Shin; Young-Hoon Kim; Kangin Lee; Inyoung Jung; Daesik Kim; Seokjoong Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Mapping the sugar dependency for rational generation of a DNA-RNA hybrid-guided Cas9 endonuclease.

Authors:  Fernando Orden Rueda; Michal Bista; Matthew D Newton; Anne U Goeppert; M Emanuela Cuomo; Euan Gordon; Felix Kröner; Jon A Read; Jonathan D Wrigley; David Rueda; Benjamin J M Taylor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  9 in total

1.  Real-time observation of Cas9 postcatalytic domain motions.

Authors:  Yanbo Wang; John Mallon; Haobo Wang; Digvijay Singh; Myung Hyun Jo; Boyang Hua; Scott Bailey; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Systematic in vitro specificity profiling reveals nicking defects in natural and engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants.

Authors:  Karthik Murugan; Shravanti K Suresh; Arun S Seetharam; Andrew J Severin; Dipali G Sashital
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Quantitative assessment of engineered Cas9 variants for target specificity enhancement by single-molecule reaction pathway analysis.

Authors:  So Young Bak; Youngri Jung; Jinho Park; Keewon Sung; Hyeon-Ki Jang; Sangsu Bae; Seong Keun Kim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Site-Specific Labeling Reveals Cas9 Induces Partial Unwinding Without RNA/DNA Pairing in Sequences Distal to the PAM.

Authors:  Yue Li; Yukang Liu; Jaideep Singh; Narin S Tangprasertchai; Ravi Trivedi; Yun Fang; Peter Z Qin
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2022-03-23

5.  5' modifications to CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA can change the dynamics and size of R-loops and inhibit DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Grace Mullally; Kara van Aelst; Mohsin M Naqvi; Fiona M Diffin; Tautvydas Karvelis; Giedrius Gasiunas; Virginijus Siksnys; Mark D Szczelkun
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Quantification of Cas9 binding and cleavage across diverse guide sequences maps landscapes of target engagement.

Authors:  Evan A Boyle; Winston R Becker; Hua B Bai; Janice S Chen; Jennifer A Doudna; William J Greenleaf
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Efficient DNA interrogation of SpCas9 governed by its electrostatic interaction with DNA beyond the PAM and protospacer.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Ziting Chen; Fangzhu Wang; Siqi Zhang; Hongyu Chen; Xueying Gu; Fengcai Wen; Jiachuan Jin; Xia Zhang; Xingxu Huang; Bin Shen; Bo Sun
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  CRISPR/Cas-Based Modifications for Therapeutic Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Nagaraj Bharathkumar; Abraham Sunil; Prabhakar Meera; Sam Aksah; Muthu Kannan; Konda Mani Saravanan; Thirunavukarasou Anand
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  BEAR reveals that increased fidelity variants can successfully reduce the mismatch tolerance of adenine but not cytosine base editors.

Authors:  András Tálas; Dorottya A Simon; Péter I Kulcsár; Éva Varga; Sarah L Krausz; Ervin Welker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.