Literature DB >> 31713030

Incentivizing Excellent Care to At-Risk Groups with a Health Equity Summary Score.

Denis Agniel1, Steven C Martino1,2, Q Burkhart1, Katrin Hambarsoomian1, Nate Orr1, Megan K Beckett1, Cara James3, Sarah Hudson Scholle4, Shondelle Wilson-Frederick3, Judy Ng4, Marc N Elliott5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social risk factors (SRFs) such as minority race-and-ethnicity or low income are associated with quality-of-care, health, and healthcare outcomes. Organizations might prioritize improving care for easier-to-treat groups over those with SRFs, but measuring, reporting, and further incentivizing quality-of-care for SRF groups may improve their care.
OBJECTIVE: To develop, as a proof-of-concept, a Health Equity Summary Score (HESS): a succinct, easy-to-understand score that could be used to promote high-quality care to those with SRFs in Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans, which provide care for almost twenty million older and disabled Americans and collect extensive quality measure and SRF data.
DESIGN: We estimated, standardized, and combined performance scores for two sets of quality measures for enrollees in 2013-2016 MA health plans, considering both current levels of care, within-plan improvement, and nationally benchmarked improvement for those with SRFs (specifically, racial-and-ethnic minority status and dual-eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid). PARTICIPANTS: All MA plans with publicly reported quality scores and 500 or more 2016 enrollees. MAIN MEASURES: Publicly reported clinical quality and patient experience measures. KEY
RESULTS: Almost 90% of plans measured for MA Star Ratings received a HESS; plans serving few patients with SRFs were excluded. The summary score was moderately positively correlated with publicly reported overall Star Ratings (r = 0.66-0.67). High-scoring plans typically had sizable enrollment of both racial-and-ethnic minorities (38-42%) and dually eligible beneficiaries (29-38%).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility of developing and estimating a HESS that is intended to promote and incentivize excellent care for racial-and-ethnic minorities and dually eligible MA enrollees. The HESS measures SRF-specific performance and does not simply duplicate overall plan Star Ratings. It also identifies plans that provide excellent care to large numbers of those with SRFs. Our methodology could be extended to other SRFs, quality measures, and settings.
© 2019. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare Advantage health plans; disparities; public reporting; quality-of-care; social risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31713030      PMCID: PMC8298664          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05473-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  33 in total

1.  The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care.

Authors:  L P Casalino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Relationship between quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare health plans.

Authors:  Amal N Trivedi; Alan M Zaslavsky; Eric C Schneider; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care?

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Pay for performance, public reporting, and racial disparities in health care: how are programs being designed?

Authors:  Alyna T Chien; Marshall H Chin; Andrew M Davis; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Adjusting Medicare Advantage star ratings for socioeconomic status and disability.

Authors:  Melony E Sorbero; Susan M Paddock; Cheryl L Damberg; Ann Haas; Mallika Kommareddi; Anagha Tolpadi; Megan Mathews; Marc N Elliott
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS data by race/ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Steven C Martino; Robin M Weinick; David E Kanouse; Julie A Brown; Amelia M Haviland; Elizabeth Goldstein; John L Adams; Katrin Hambarsoomian; David J Klein; Marc N Elliott
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Gender, race, and socioeconomic status affects outcomes after lung cancer resections in the United States.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; David A Harris; Benjamin D Kozower; David R Jones; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi; Christine L Lau
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease.

Authors:  B G Link; J Phelan
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995

9.  Understanding The Role Played By Medicare's Patient Experience Points System In Hospital Reimbursement.

Authors:  Marc N Elliott; Megan K Beckett; William G Lehrman; Paul Cleary; Christopher W Cohea; Laura A Giordano; Elizabeth H Goldstein; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care: examination of the hospital quality alliance measures.

Authors:  Romana Hasnain-Wynia; David W Baker; David Nerenz; Joe Feinglass; Anne C Beal; Mary Beth Landrum; Raj Behal; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-25
View more
  7 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in care for health system-affiliated physician organizations and non-affiliated physician organizations.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Ashley M Kranz; Maria DeYoreo; Blen Eshete-Roesler; Marc N Elliott; José J Escarce; Mark E Totten; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  An Equity Agenda for the Field of Health Care Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Margaret O'Kane; Shantanu Agrawal; Leah Binder; Victor Dzau; Tejal K Gandhi; Rachel Harrington; Kedar Mate; Paul McGann; David Meyers; Paul Rosen; Michelle Schreiber; Dan Schummers
Journal:  NAM Perspect       Date:  2021-09-15

3.  Association of Race and Ethnicity and Medicare Program Type With Ambulatory Care Access and Quality Measures.

Authors:  Kenton J Johnston; Gmerice Hammond; David J Meyers; Karen E Joynt Maddox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 157.335

4.  Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.

Authors:  Eric T Roberts; Jennifer M Mellor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 9.048

5.  Distinguishing neighborhood and individual social risk factors in health care.

Authors:  Megan K Beckett; Steven C Martino; Denis Agniel; Megan Mathews; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Cara James; Shondelle Wilson-Frederick; Nate Orr; Biayna Darabidian; Marc N Elliott
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.734

6.  Association of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings With Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Quality of Care.

Authors:  David J Meyers; Momotazur Rahman; Vincent Mor; Ira B Wilson; Amal N Trivedi
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-06-11

7.  Health Disparities in Pharmacy Practice Within the Community: Let's Brainstorm for Solutions.

Authors:  Keri Hurley-Kim; Jacqueise Unonu; Cheryl Wisseh; Christine Cadiz; Erin Knox; Aya F Ozaki; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.