Rafael Sanjuan-Cervero1. 1. Orthopedic and Trauma Department, Hospital de Denia, Partida Beniadla s/n, 03700, Alicante, Denia, Spain. sanjuan.rafcer@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is a recent treatment for Dupuytren disease, which is a fibroproliferative disorder that leads to progressive, persistent digital flexion contracture that interferes with basic daily activities. While CCH has changed the treatment of this hand disorder, numerous concerns have to be analyzed. AIMS: Our purpose is to assess the current status of this medical treatment. METHODS: Literary review based on a manual search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Academic. RESULTS: Pharmacoeconomic analyses support the use of CCH, but long-term studies showing that it should be favored over conventional surgery or other treatments are lacking. Treatment decisions, therefore, must be guided by current data, which include a 5-year recurrence rate of 47%. Complications following CCH treatment are also a controversial topic, as rates of over 90% have been reported, although most of the complications are mild and self-limiting. A definition and classification of CCH-related complications is sorely needed. If we exclude adverse effects that could be considered inherent to the mechanisms of action of CCH, then the complication rate would be similar to rates reported for other techniques. Although CCH is becoming an increasingly popular treatment for Dupuytren disease, the potential applications of this modality, are much higher than currently believed, for more disorders characterized by excessive fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Currently, the administration of this treatment is promising although long-term studies are necessary to see the real role that this drug can play in both Dupuytren's disease and other fibrotic disorders.
BACKGROUND: Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is a recent treatment for Dupuytren disease, which is a fibroproliferative disorder that leads to progressive, persistent digital flexion contracture that interferes with basic daily activities. While CCH has changed the treatment of this hand disorder, numerous concerns have to be analyzed. AIMS: Our purpose is to assess the current status of this medical treatment. METHODS: Literary review based on a manual search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Academic. RESULTS: Pharmacoeconomic analyses support the use of CCH, but long-term studies showing that it should be favored over conventional surgery or other treatments are lacking. Treatment decisions, therefore, must be guided by current data, which include a 5-year recurrence rate of 47%. Complications following CCH treatment are also a controversial topic, as rates of over 90% have been reported, although most of the complications are mild and self-limiting. A definition and classification of CCH-related complications is sorely needed. If we exclude adverse effects that could be considered inherent to the mechanisms of action of CCH, then the complication rate would be similar to rates reported for other techniques. Although CCH is becoming an increasingly popular treatment for Dupuytren disease, the potential applications of this modality, are much higher than currently believed, for more disorders characterized by excessive fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Currently, the administration of this treatment is promising although long-term studies are necessary to see the real role that this drug can play in both Dupuytren's disease and other fibrotic disorders.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse drug reaction; Collagenase; Dupuytren’s disease; Fibroproliferative
Authors: Clayton A Peimer; Philip Blazar; Stephen Coleman; F Thomas D Kaplan; Ted Smith; Tommy Lindau Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Yannick F Diehm; Christoph Hirche; Martin R Berger; Jörg Heil; Michael Golatta; Dimitra Kotsougiani; Bohdan Pomahac; Ulrich Kneser; Sebastian Fischer Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: J Dias; C Bainbridge; C Leclercq; R A Gerber; D Guerin; J C Cappelleri; P P Szczypa; L B Dahlin Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.503