Michaela Hiebler-Ragger1,2,3, Human-Friedrich Unterrainer2,3, Andrew R Thompson4, Stephen Kellett4, Elisabeth Aberer5. 1. Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbrugger Platz 8, 8036, Graz, Österreich. 2. Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapeutische Medizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Österreich. 3. Center for Integrative Addiction Research (CIAR), Grüner Kreis, Wien, Österreich. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Großbritannien. 5. Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbrugger Platz 8, 8036, Graz, Österreich. elisabeth.aberer@medunigraz.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skin shame plays an important role in the psychological distress of dermatological patients. However, it is rarely examined in research or clinical practice due to the lack of availability of a robust measure of skin shame. This study sought to adapt and validate the Skin Shame Scale (SSS-24) for use in the German-speaking population. METHODS: The SSS-24 questionnaire was completed by 488 dermatologically healthy (DH) individuals (66.6% women) and 339 dermatological patients (DP; 66.7% women). Participants also completed measures of general shame (SHAME) and of psychological distress (BSI[Brief Symptom Inventory]-18). RESULTS: The SSS-24 showed adequate psychometric properties and a high internal consistency in both samples (DH: α = 0.91; DP: α = 0.95). DP reported more skin shame than DH (p < 0.001) but in both samples more skin shame was associated with more general shame and more psychological distress (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the psychometric properties of the English original version were replicated in the German version of the SSS-24. Due to the strong associations with general shame and psychological distress, skin shame should be considered an important parameter in psychodermatology. The SSS-24 enables further research into the role of shame in skin conditions and provides a useful tool for identifying patients who might benefit from psychosocial interventions.
BACKGROUND: Skin shame plays an important role in the psychological distress of dermatological patients. However, it is rarely examined in research or clinical practice due to the lack of availability of a robust measure of skin shame. This study sought to adapt and validate the Skin Shame Scale (SSS-24) for use in the German-speaking population. METHODS: The SSS-24 questionnaire was completed by 488 dermatologically healthy (DH) individuals (66.6% women) and 339 dermatological patients (DP; 66.7% women). Participants also completed measures of general shame (SHAME) and of psychological distress (BSI[Brief Symptom Inventory]-18). RESULTS: The SSS-24 showed adequate psychometric properties and a high internal consistency in both samples (DH: α = 0.91; DP: α = 0.95). DP reported more skin shame than DH (p < 0.001) but in both samples more skin shame was associated with more general shame and more psychological distress (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the psychometric properties of the English original version were replicated in the German version of the SSS-24. Due to the strong associations with general shame and psychological distress, skin shame should be considered an important parameter in psychodermatology. The SSS-24 enables further research into the role of shame in skin conditions and provides a useful tool for identifying patients who might benefit from psychosocial interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Psychodermatology; Psychological distress; Psychosocial interventions; Shame; Validation of questionnaire
Authors: Donja Homayoon; Michaela Hiebler-Ragger; Moritz Zenker; Wolfgang Weger; Human Unterrainer; Elisabeth Aberer Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 3.875