Literature DB >> 31712388

Childhood cancer survivorship: barriers and preferences.

Christina Signorelli1,2, Claire Wakefield3,2, Jordana K McLoone3,2, Joanna Fardell3,2, Janelle M Jones4,5, Kate H Turpin6, Jon Emery7, Gisela Michel8, Peter Downie9, Jane E Skeen10, Richard Cohn3,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many survivors are disengaged from follow-up, mandating alternative models of survivorship-focused care for late effects surveillance. We explored survivors' barriers to accessing, and preferences for survivorship care.
METHODS: We invited Australian and New Zealand survivors of childhood cancer from three age groups: <16 years (represented by parents), 16-25 years (adolescent and young adults (AYAs)) and >25 years ('older survivors'). Participants completed questionnaires and optional interviews.
RESULTS: 633 survivors/parents completed questionnaires: 187 parents of young survivors (mean age: 12.4 years), 251 AYAs (mean age: 20.6 years) and 195 older survivors (mean age: 32.5 years). Quantitative data were complemented by 151 in-depth interviews. Most participants, across all age groups, preferred specialised follow-up (ie, involving oncologists, nurses or a multidisciplinary team; 86%-97%). Many (36%-58%) were unwilling to receive community-based follow-up. More parents (75%) than AYAs (58%) and older survivors (30%) were engaged in specialised follow-up. While follow-up engagement was significantly lower in older survivors, survivors' prevalence of late effects increased. Of those attending a follow-up clinic, 34%-56% were satisfied with their care, compared with 14%-15% of those not receiving cancer-focused care (p<0.001). Commonly reported barriers included lack of awareness about follow-up availability (67%), followed by logistical (65%), care-related beliefs (59%) and financial reasons (57%). Older survivors (p<0.001), living outside major cities (p=0.008), and who were further from diagnosis (p=0.014) reported a higher number of barriers.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding patient-reported barriers, and tailoring care to survivors' follow-up preferences, may improve engagement with care and ensure that the survivorship needs of this population are met. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers; long-term follow-up; models of care; paediatric oncology; patient preferences; survivorship

Year:  2019        PMID: 31712388     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   4.633


  3 in total

Review 1.  Long-term care for people treated for cancer during childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Emily S Tonorezos; Richard J Cohn; Adam W Glaser; Jeremy Lewin; Eileen Poon; Claire E Wakefield; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 202.731

Review 2.  Realist Review of Care Models That Include Primary Care for Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Claire Snyder; Youngjee Choi; Katherine C Smith; Renee F Wilson; Christina T Yuan; Paul C Nathan; Allen Zhang; Karen A Robinson
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2022-03-02

3.  Childhood Cancer Survivors' Adherence to Healthcare Recommendations Made Through a Distance-Delivered Survivorship Program.

Authors:  Joseph Elliot Alchin; Christina Signorelli; Jordana Kathleen McLoone; Claire Elizabeth Wakefield; Joanna Elizabeth Fardell; Karen Johnston; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2022-08-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.