| Literature DB >> 31712211 |
Carlota Gudiol1,2,3, Montserrat Arnan4, Manuela Aguilar-Guisado5,3, Cristina Royo-Cebrecos6,3, Isabel Sánchez-Ortega4, Isabel Montero7, Cecilia Martín-Gandul5,3, Júlia Laporte-Amargós6, Adaia Albasanz-Puig6,3, Sermed Nicolae6, Maria Perayre8, Damaris Berbel9, Cristian Tebe10, Judith Riera4, Anna Sureda4, José Miguel Cisneros5,3, Jordi Carratalà6,2,3.
Abstract
Infection of long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) remains a challenge in the clinical management of cancer patients. We aimed to determine whether a lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin would be more effective than placebo for preventing nontunneled CVC infection in high-risk neutropenic hematologic patients. We performed a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled trial involving 150 hematological patients with neutropenia carrying nontunneled CVCs who were assigned to receive CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin or heparin alone. The primary endpoint was bacterial colonization of the CVC hubs. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), CVC removal, adverse events related to the lock solution, and the 30-day case fatality rate. CVC lock solution with taurolidine-citrate-heparin was associated with less colonization of the CVC hubs than that with placebo, with no statistically significant differences: 4.1%, versus 10.1% (relative risk [RR] = 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11 to 1.52), with a cumulative incidence of 4.17 (95% CI = 0.87 to 11.70) and 10.14 (95% CI = 4.18 to 19.79), respectively. There were no significant differences regarding the secondary endpoints. Only three episodes of CRBSI occurred during the study period. No adverse events related to the administration of the lock solution occurred. In this trial involving high-risk patients carrying nontunneled CVCs, the use of taurolidine-citrate-heparin did not show a benefit over the use of placebo. Nevertheless, the safety of this prevention strategy and the trend toward less hub colonization in the taurolidine-citrate-heparin group raise the interest in assessing its efficacy in centers with higher rates of CRBSI. (This study has been registered in ISRCTN under identifier ISRCTN47102251.).Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic lock technique; cancer; catheter infection; catheter-related bacteremia; catheter-related bloodstream infection; lock technique; neutropenia; prevention; taurolidine
Year: 2020 PMID: 31712211 PMCID: PMC6985755 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01521-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191