Grace A Noppert1, Zhenhua Yang2, Philippa Clarke3, Peter Davidson4, Wen Ye5, Mark L Wilson2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hil. Electronic address: gnop@email.unc.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI. 5. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Novel approaches must address the underlying factors sustaining the tuberculosis (TB) epidemic in the United States, specifically what maintains new Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission. METHODS: Culture-confirmed TB cases reported to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (2004-2012) were analyzed for time-restricted genotypic and/or geospatial clustering. Cases with both types of clustering were used as a proxy for recent, local transmission. Modified, multivariate Poisson regression models were fit to estimate this prevalence in relation to various individual- and neighborhood-level demographic and socio-economic variables. RESULTS: Those individuals that were spatially clustered were 1.7 times as likely to also be time-restricted genotypically clustered. The prevalence of recent, local transmission was higher among U.S.-born cases, males, and non-Hispanic blacks. Moreover, people living in neighborhoods in the highest poverty quartile had 13.8 times the prevalence of recent, local transmission compared with those in the lowest poverty neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest geographic areas with high concentration of TB cases are likely driven by ongoing transmission, rather than enclaves of individuals who have reactivated a case of latent TB. Furthermore, efforts to continue reducing Mtb transmission in the United States, and other low-incidence settings, must better identify community-level sources of risk, manifested through the complex social interactions among people and their environments.
PURPOSE: Novel approaches must address the underlying factors sustaining the tuberculosis (TB) epidemic in the United States, specifically what maintains new Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission. METHODS: Culture-confirmed TB cases reported to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (2004-2012) were analyzed for time-restricted genotypic and/or geospatial clustering. Cases with both types of clustering were used as a proxy for recent, local transmission. Modified, multivariate Poisson regression models were fit to estimate this prevalence in relation to various individual- and neighborhood-level demographic and socio-economic variables. RESULTS: Those individuals that were spatially clustered were 1.7 times as likely to also be time-restricted genotypically clustered. The prevalence of recent, local transmission was higher among U.S.-born cases, males, and non-Hispanic blacks. Moreover, people living in neighborhoods in the highest poverty quartile had 13.8 times the prevalence of recent, local transmission compared with those in the lowest poverty neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest geographic areas with high concentration of TB cases are likely driven by ongoing transmission, rather than enclaves of individuals who have reactivated a case of latent TB. Furthermore, efforts to continue reducing Mtb transmission in the United States, and other low-incidence settings, must better identify community-level sources of risk, manifested through the complex social interactions among people and their environments.
Authors: Natalie Stennis; Lisa Trieu; Bianca Perri; Janelle Anderson; Muhammad Mushtaq; Shama Ahuja Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lukas Fenner; Sebastien Gagneux; Peter Helbling; Manuel Battegay; Hans L Rieder; Gaby E Pfyffer; Marcel Zwahlen; Hansjakob Furrer; Hans H Siegrist; Jan Fehr; Marisa Dolina; Alexandra Calmy; David Stucki; Katia Jaton; Jean-Paul Janssens; Jesica Mazza Stalder; Thomas Bodmer; Beatrice Ninet; Erik C Böttger; Matthias Egger Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: L K Fitzpatrick; J A Hardacker; W Heirendt; T Agerton; A Streicher; H Melnyk; R Ridzon; S Valway; I Onorato Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2001-10-24 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Grace A Noppert; Zhenhua Yang; Philippa Clarke; Wen Ye; Peter Davidson; Mark L Wilson Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Patrick K Moonan; Smita Ghosh; John E Oeltmann; J Steven Kammerer; Lauren S Cowan; Thomas R Navin Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Patrick K Moonan; Manuel Bayona; Teresa N Quitugua; Joseph Oppong; Denise Dunbar; Kenneth C Jost; Gerry Burgess; Karan P Singh; Stephen E Weis Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2004-10-13 Impact factor: 3.918