Literature DB >> 31711833

Renal fossa recurrence after radical nephrectomy: Current management, and oncological outcomes.

Agustin Romeo1, Patricio Garcia Marchiñena2, Alberto M Jurado2, Guillermo Gueglio2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: Kidney cancers represent 2% of cancers worldwide; the most common type is renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC). Surgical treatment remains the only effective therapy for localized renal cell carcinoma. Approximately 20% to 38% of patients undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN) for localized RCC will have subsequent disease progression, with 0.8% to 3.6% of local recurrences within the ipsilateral retroperitoneum (RFR). The main objective of this study is to evaluate prognostic features, oncological outcomes, and current management for renal fossa recurrence in patients with history of RN for RCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 733 patients who underwent open or laparoscopic RN for unilateral T1-T4 N0 M0 RCC between 2010 and 2016 at the Urology Department of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.
RESULTS: During the mentioned period, of a total of 733 RNs (open/laparoscopic), 561 patients with RCC were included in the study. After a median follow-up time of 24 months (12-36) (interquartile range), 21 (3.74%) patients out of 561, developed renal fossa recurrence. Of these, 13 (2.31%) patients were diagnosed with isolated local renal fossa recurrence and different treatment approaches were adopted; 11 patients underwent open surgical resection, 1 patient laparoscopic surgical resection, and 1 case was treated with cryoablation. Regarding cancer-specific survival, estimated 4-year cancer-specific survival in patients without RFR, with isolated RFR (iRFR) and not isolated RFR (niRFR) was 82.7% (CI 95% 70.2-95.2), 69.2% (IC 44.2-94.2) and 0%, respectively (log rank test P < 0.0001 being niRFR group different to others. Non isolated RFR was a death risk factor with a HR of 11.4 (4.8-27.2) compared with iRFR or no recurrence. Overall, 51% (IC 26.6-71.2) of patients with any RFR died at 4 years follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Although RFR is a rare condition, in the absence of distant metastatic disease, aggressive surgical resection should be our aim. High pathological tumoral stage at original nephrectomy and high tumoral grade are independent risk factors for RFR. This group of patients needs closer follow-up to detect earlier recurrences and decide a treatment strategy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Management; Renal cell carcinoma; Renal fossa recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31711833     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  2 in total

1.  A novel classification for local recurrence after surgical removal of renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Yuasa
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08

2.  Management of local recurrence after radical nephrectomy: surgical removal with or without systemic treatment is still the gold standard. Results from a multicenter international cohort.

Authors:  Michele Marchioni; Petros Sountoulides; Maria Furlan; Maria Carmen Mir; Lucia Aretano; Jose Rubio-Briones; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Marta Di Nicola; Alfredo Aguilera Bazán; Alessandro Antonelli; Claudio Simeone; Luigi Schips
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.370

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.