| Literature DB >> 31711502 |
Naohiro Yoshida1, Takeshi Aoyagi2, Yoshizo Kimura3, Yoshiki Naito4, Aya Izuwa2, Kimihisa Mizoguchi2, Kota Ishii2, Yu Tanaka2, Emi Ohnishi2, Shun Miura2, Satoshi Shimamura2, Nobuhisa Shirahama2, Kazuhisa Kaneshiro2, Akihiro Saruwatari2, Ayako Iwanaga2, Yoshihiko Sadakari2, Gentaro Hirokata2, Toshiro Ogata2, Masahiko Taniguchi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) is often distinguished by what it is not: the precancerous lesions are not mass-forming, are not the cause of bile duct obstruction, and are small enough (less than 5 mm long) to evade detection by the naked eye. Here, we describe an atypical case of BilIN resembling cholangiocarcinoma (CC) that was large enough to be identified by diagnostic imaging and presented with obstructive jaundice caused by a hematoma in the common bile duct (CBD). CASEEntities:
Keywords: Bile duct; Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN); Cholangiocarcinoma
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31711502 PMCID: PMC6849222 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1737-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Fig. 1Plain CT scan image on admission. Coronal section of plain CT showing the high-density area in the CBD (arrow) and the dilation of the CBD and intrahepatic bile duct
Fig. 2ERCP and the image of Vater’s papilla. ERCP showing a filling defect (arrows) in the CBD and a dilated CBD (a). EST revealed the defect was not choledocholithiasis but a hematoma in the CBD, and the hematoma was drained through the incised Vater’s papilla (b)
Fig. 3Enhanced CT scan images after EST. Enhanced CT scan showing improved dilation of the CBD and enhanced wall thickness (arrows) of the bile duct measuring 25 × 10 mm at the union of the cystic and common hepatic ducts (a, b)
Fig. 4The findings of MRCP. It shows a filling defect (arrows) at the union of the cystic and common hepatic ducts (a, b)
Fig. 5The findings of cholangioscope. It detected an elevated tumor covered by sludge in the common bile duct. The mucous membrane around the tumor showed redness and a malignant tumor was suspected
Fig. 6The macroscopic and pathological findings of the resected tumor. Arrows showing the irregular elevated mucosa with an ulcerated lesion of the resected tumor (a). The pathological examination of the resected tumor revealed that the ulcerated lesion had inflammatory granulation tissue but did not contain invasive carcinoma (b) (hematoxylin and eosin). Many consecutive intraepithelial micropapillary lesions spread around the ulcerated lesion (arrows), and the epithelial cells showed an increased nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio, nuclear hyperchromasia, and architectural atypia (c) (hematoxylin and eosin, × 200). The pathological diagnosis was BilIN-1 to -2. Immunohistochemical staining showed that S100P was slightly expressed in the cytoplasm and MUC5AC was positive. MUC1 was negative and p53 was not overexpressed (d S100P, e MUC1, f MUC5AC, g p53) (× 200)