Pascal Rusch1,2, Björn Schremmer1,2, Christian Strelow3, Alf Mews3, Dirk Dorfs1,2,4, Nadja C Bigall1,2,4. 1. Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry , Leibniz Universität Hannover , Callinstraße 3A , 30167 Hannover , Germany. 2. Laboratory of Nano and Quantum Engineering , Leibniz Universität Hannover , Schneiderberg 39 , 30167 Hannover , Germany. 3. Institute of Physical Chemistry , University of Hamburg , Grindelallee 117 , 20146 Hamburg , Germany. 4. Cluster of Excellence PhoenixD (Photonics, Optics, and Engineering - Innovation Across Disciplines) , 30167 Hannover , Germany.
Abstract
The influence of interparticle contact in nanoparticle-based aerogel network structures is investigated by selectively connecting or isolating the building blocks inside of the network, thereby coupling and decoupling them in regards to their optical and electronic properties. This is achieved by tuning the synthesis sequence and exchanging the point of shell growth and the point of particle assembly, leading to two distinctly different structures as examined by electron microscopy. By thorough examination of the resulting optical properties of the generated structures, the clear correlation between nanoscopic/microscopic structure and macroscopic optical properties is demonstrated. Temperature-dependent measurements and effective mass approximation calculations support our findings.
The influence of interparticle contact in nanoparticle-based aerogel network structures is investigated by selectively connecting or isolating the building blocks inside of the network, thereby coupling and decoupling them in regards to their optical and electronic properties. This is achieved by tuning the synthesis sequence and exchanging the point of shell growth and the point of particle assembly, leading to two distinctly different structures as examined by electron microscopy. By thorough examination of the resulting optical properties of the generated structures, the clear correlation between nanoscopic/microscopic structure and macroscopic optical properties is demonstrated. Temperature-dependent measurements and effective mass approximation calculations support our findings.
One potential method to immobilize
nanoparticles and even form macroscopic solids while retaining the
nanoscopic properties of colloid chemically synthesized nanocrystals
is the assembly of said particles into three-dimensional network structures.
The network formation is achieved by controlled destabilization of
a colloidal nanoparticle solution. By carefully adjusting the speed
of destabilization, instead of precipitation, the particles can form
an interconnected macroscopic network often called a gel. This method
has been introduced for semiconductor nanoparticles[1−3] and has been
expanded to date with different materials,[4−9] shapes,[10−12] and assembly routes.[13−15] Already in the first
instance of such semiconductor nanoparticle-based aerogel networks,
the emission of the newly generated macroscopic body was described,
although at low temperature.[1] It was shown
that the monolithic assembly of nanoparticles in this instance shows
a much higher intensity of the trap state emission compared to the
initial nanoparticles. The reflectance spectroscopy still shows size
quantization effects, which indicates that the nanoscopic properties
of the nanoparticle building blocks can be transferred onto macroscopic
bodies with these techniques.[1] By using
core–shell particles, the trap state emission could be avoided
and the fluorescence of the nanoparticle building blocks could be
completely carried over to a macroscopic solid.[16] CdSe/CdS dot-in-rod nanostructures have already been investigated
extensively regarding their optical properties and the underlying
electronic processes.[17−23] Building further on this structure, our group was later able to
show that the assembly of nanoparticle building blocks into a network
structure can actually not only be performed while retaining the optical
properties of the particles but also can be used to introduce new
optical properties into the final structure.[24] In the work reported, CdSe/CdS nanoparticles were used as pseudotype-II
building blocks, and it could be shown that networks consisting of
these building blocks have drastically increased fluorescence lifetimes.
This was attributed to the excited electron being able to travel within
the network of interconnected building blocks while the hole is localized
in the CdSe cores of individual building blocks.[24] Similarly, an influence of the aspect ratio of the nanorod
(NR) building blocks on their optical properties could be shown.[25] Recently, further studies have been undertaken
using spectroelectrochemical measurements to understand the unique
optical properties of semiconductor nanoparticle gels and suggest
their applicability as sensors.[26,27]In the present
work, we aim to employ our recently introduced method
of post-gelation modification[28] to build
up nanoparticle-based network structures in two different sequences
with the aim of selectively coupling and decoupling the individual
building blocks, as illustrated in Figure . The silica encapsulation of singular dispersed
nanoparticles has already been described.[29] A thin silica shell was grown according to this route, and such
insulated nanoparticles were subsequently embedded into a silica gel
monolith. The silica shell essentially insulates the particles and
prevents direct contact between the semiconductor NRs in the macroscopic
monolith. In parallel, the same CdSe/CdS dot-in-rod nanoparticles
were assembled first into an interconnected network structure. This
network was afterward surrounded with a silica coating while leaving
the interparticle connection intact. With this procedure, we have
been able to generate a nanoparticle-based network with strongly enhanced
mechanical stability,[28] but in this work,
we aimed to employ it to synthesize two comparable solid macroscopic
porous systems (solvogels and, after supercritical drying, aerogels),
one with and one without crystal-to-crystal contact between the semiconductor
particles, allowing us to further investigate the influence of the
interparticle contact on the optoelectronic properties.
Figure 1
Schematic depiction
of the two different synthesis sequences employed.
Starting from (top) CdSe/CdS NR building blocks upon (right side)
assembling into the network structure first and then modification
by silica shell growth or (left side) first modification of the individual
particles with a silica shell and then incorporation of them into
a network, as illustrated by computer graphics.
Schematic depiction
of the two different synthesis sequences employed.
Starting from (top) CdSe/CdS NR building blocks upon (right side)
assembling into the network structure first and then modification
by silica shell growth or (left side) first modification of the individual
particles with a silica shell and then incorporation of them into
a network, as illustrated by computer graphics.The optical spectroscopy of the pristine CdSe/CdS
NRs (Figure S2) in colloidal solution (which
are the
building blocks for the aerogels) in organic solution shows the characteristics
of this nanoparticle structure. The absorption of the cadmium selenide
core is visible as a small band at 570 nm, while the cadmium sulfide
shell is responsible for the strong absorption band at 468 nm.[30] Due to the electronic structure of the NRs,
the hole is trapped in the CdSe core after excitation. This leads
to a strong fluorescence emission at 585 nm, slightly bathochromically
shifted compared to the absorption of the core. The phase transfer[31,32] to aqueous solution only marginally influences the absorption of
the NRs; the position of the emission maximum does not change. However,
the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) is reduced slightly from
35 to 27%. The fluorescence lifetime also decreases from 18 ns in
the organic solution to 16 ns in the aqueous solution (Figure S4a,b). These NRs are assembled by controlled
destabilization by hydrogen peroxide into porous network structures,
as can be seen in Figure a. The aerogels prepared this way show very similar optical
features (Figure ).
In the nonmodified aerogels, the emission is visible at 588 nm. The
absorption of the CdSe core can be seen at 563 nm, while the absorption
of the CdS shell appears as a broad band at around 500 nm. Especially
for the interpretation of the absorption spectra, it is important
to keep the state of the sample in mind. Because of the high influence
of scattering compared to a colloidal nanoparticle solution, the gel
is measured using an integrating sphere. Also, the concentration of
the nanoparticles is much higher than one would use for conventional
nanoparticle spectroscopy in solution. This leads to the much larger
prominence of the signal from the cadmium selenide core in the spectra,
which is only barely visible in the spectrum of the colloidal solution.
It also causes the spectra to reach saturation in the area of the
cadmium sulfide absorption band. For light of energies higher than
a certain value or below a certain wavelength, the gels simply become
optically dense materials in which all incoming light is absorbed
and the higher-energy features of the spectrum are not measurable.
The findings discussed above are consistent with our previous data
of such types of aerogels;[24] therefore,
these samples can be employed as references for our new materials,
as will be discussed in the next paragraph.
Figure 2
Electron microscopic
images of the investigated structures comparing
synthesis sequences starting with the gel network assembly (a,c,e)
or starting with the particle modification (b,d,f). (a) Initial network
of interconnected CdSe/CdS NRs before shell growth in TEM; (b) silica-modified
CdSe/CdS NRs in TEM; network of CdSe/CdS NRs modified with silica
after network formation (c) in SEM and (e) in TEM with the inset at
higher magnification; and gel network generated from silica-modified
CdSe/CdS NRs (d) in SEM and (f) in TEM, with the inset at higher magnification.
Figure 3
Optical properties of silica-modified CdSe/CdS NR aerogels:
(a)
absorption spectra, (b) emission spectra, (c) fluorescence lifetime
decay, and (d) PLQYs of aerogels modified with different amounts of
TEOS. As can be derived from the four panels, the silica shell modification
does not significantly alter the optical properties (in absorption,
emission, PL lifetime, and quantum yield) in comparison to the nonmodified
CdSe/CdS NR aerogels.
Electron microscopic
images of the investigated structures comparing
synthesis sequences starting with the gel network assembly (a,c,e)
or starting with the particle modification (b,d,f). (a) Initial network
of interconnected CdSe/CdS NRs before shell growth in TEM; (b) silica-modified
CdSe/CdS NRs in TEM; network of CdSe/CdS NRs modified with silica
after network formation (c) in SEM and (e) in TEM with the inset at
higher magnification; and gel network generated from silica-modified
CdSe/CdS NRs (d) in SEM and (f) in TEM, with the inset at higher magnification.Optical properties of silica-modified CdSe/CdS NR aerogels:
(a)
absorption spectra, (b) emission spectra, (c) fluorescence lifetime
decay, and (d) PLQYs of aerogels modified with different amounts of
TEOS. As can be derived from the four panels, the silica shell modification
does not significantly alter the optical properties (in absorption,
emission, PL lifetime, and quantum yield) in comparison to the nonmodified
CdSe/CdS NR aerogels.In a second step, the networks are modified with
a continuous silica
shell, as can be seen in TEM (Figure e); see the Experimental Methods section for details. The porous structure is still present after
this modification, as can be seen in SEM images (Figure c) and based on the core network
of connected NRs. For silica-modified gels, the optical properties
are almost identical compared to the unmodified gels, as shown in Figure and discussed above.
The emission wavelength is slightly shifted toward longer wavelengths
from 590 to 597 nm. This could simply be due to the change in dielectric
surrounding and minor inhomogeneities during the shell growth process,
but as no clear relation to the amount of silica used or other variables
in the synthesis procedure is visible, the exact reason is unclear.
The absorption features are also similar to the absorption of the
CdSe cores around 560 nm and the CdS absorption below 500 nm.
The optical density of absorption saturation changes, which we attribute
to a variation of illuminated sample areas (which is technically unavoidable
due to inhomogeneities of the monolithic samples). The PLQY of all
gels—modified and unmodified—is similar. The PLQY of
the pristine NRs in toluene is measured to be 35%; the PLQY of an
unmodified aerogel is very close to this at 32% and a bit higher than
the PLQY of the water transferred NRs (27%). Shell-modified aerogels
show PLQYs of 26–29% (Figure d). Within the uncertainty (5%, determined by reproducibility
tests with the reference dye rhodamine 6G) estimated for these measurements,
these differences are minimal. The loss of PLQY by the silica shell
modification can thus be seen as insignificant. The fluorescence lifetime
of the aerogels is especially interesting as the connection of the
NRs with each other is a key factor in the fluorescence decay. In
an earlier work of our group, a strongly increased fluorescence lifetime
for CdSe/CdS NR aerogels compared to the NRs in solution was shown
and attributed to the crystal-to-crystal type connection of the rods.
We explained this effect with a higher delocalization of the electron
after excitation, resulting in less overlap between electron and hole
wave functions and therefore longer PL decay times.[24] The lifetime increase can therefore be seen as indication
for an electronic coupling between interconnected nanoparticles in
the aerogel networks. In fact, in the present work, we also observe
increased fluorescence lifetimes for all aerogels—with and
without a silica shell—compared to the lifetime of the NRs
in solution. The fluorescence lifetime of unmodified CdSe/CdS NR aerogels is 40 ns, which
is in accordance
with our previous findings.[24] For modified
aerogels, the lifetimes are in the range of 33–41 ns (Figures c and S3). This means that also the drastic lifetime
increase is present for all Si/Cd ratios investigated for silica shell-modified
aerogels, which is comparable to that of unmodified aerogels. Hence,
we conclude that also in the silica shell-modified aerogels the electron
seems to be able to travel within the network while the hole is located
at the CdSe cores. If this explanation for the increase in fluorescence
lifetime is to be believed, a network containing individual isolated
particles—e.g., by the growth of an insulating silica shell
before network formation—should show very much different behavior
regarding the fluorescence lifetimes. In this instance, fluorescence
lifetimes should not increase between a particle dispersion and the
networkTo investigate whether the sequence of synthesis steps
(namely,
network formation and silica coating) influence the physical properties
of the resulting nanocrystal aerogels in terms of fluorescence lifetime,
the same NRs as those used for the production of the described modified
gels were now first surrounded with silica shells according to literature
procedures[29] (see the Experimental Methods section and Figure b) and subsequently gelated in the presence
of further TEOS. This resulted in a silica matrix with singular embedded
NRs, which were not in direct contact with each other and should therefore
have been decoupled, i.e., they should not have shown increased PL
decay times (see also Figure S6 in the
Supporting Information). These single NRs in a silica matrix can be
seen in the TEM (Figure f). The larger structure of these silica networks can be seen in
SEM (Figure d) and
is now defined by the silica as opposed to the networks made up of
connected NRs, which are defined by this NR core network (see also Figure for comparison).
The different structures are illustrated schematically in Figure . The silica aerogel
is essentially utilized as an electronically isolating spacer between
the NRs. The emission and absorption spectra of these silica-coated
NRs in solution and in the silica gel only differ insignificantly
from each other (Figure a–e). Also, no significant spectral difference of such gels
and particles from the pristine NRs (before silica growth) or from
the unmodified and modified aerogels is observed. The lifetime measurements
confirm our initial expectation. While the aerogels produced from
CdSe/CdS NRs as well as their post-gelation-modified counterparts
show distinct ultralong lifetimes of ca. 40 ns, the aerogels with
embedded NRs, which are each separated from one other by a thin silica
shell, exhibit much shorter lifetimes of 13–14 ns (which are
comparable to those of the initial NRs in organic solution) (Figure c,f). These observations
further support our previous assumption of the influence of interparticle
contact on the fluorescence lifetime in NR gels[24] and show that this contact between the individual NRs is
still present after post-gelation modification.
Figure 4
Differences in optical
properties depending on the synthesis sequence:
(top row) network formation first, (bottom row) silica modification
first. (a,d) Absorption spectra normalized to the first excitonic
transition of the CdSe core, (b,e) emission spectra, and (c,f) fluorescence
decay measurements. Colors of the graphs also correspond to the borders
used in Figure .
Differences in optical
properties depending on the synthesis sequence:
(top row) network formation first, (bottom row) silica modification
first. (a,d) Absorption spectra normalized to the first excitonic
transition of the CdSe core, (b,e) emission spectra, and (c,f) fluorescence
decay measurements. Colors of the graphs also correspond to the borders
used in Figure .To understand the electronic processes underlying
the observed
fluorescence behavior, theoretical calculations based on the effective
mass approximation were performed to simulate the excited electron
wave functions of a network structure of crystal connected particles. Figure shows the results
for the eight lowest excited electron wave functions of two merged
CdSe/CdS NRs that should represent the smallest subunit in the network
exhibiting the properties of the whole structure. Due to its low effective
mass and the high valence band discontinuity of CdS and CdSe, the
hole always localizes inside of one of the two CdSe cores (not shown
in Figure ). The first
excited electron state (E1 in Figure ) also strongly localizes at the position of the hole
due to the combination of the attractive potential formed by conduction
band discontinuity and the coulomb interaction with the localized
whole. The properties of this state do not differ from those of the
corresponding state in an isolated particle and thus do not explain
the observed increase in PL lifetime. The second excited electron
state (E2) is also localized at the second CdSe core not occupied
by the hole. Due to the strongly reduced coulomb interaction with
the hole, it is lifted in energy by about 80 meV. However, the next
higher excited electron states (E3–E8; see Figure and additionally Figure S7 in the Supporting Infomation for the
individual wave functions) exhibit an increasing delocalization over
the merged CdSe/CdS NR system with increasing energy. The wave functions
of these higher electron states indeed have a smaller overlap with
the hole wave function. We thus attribute these higher electron states
to be responsible for the observed fluorescence kinetics. Naturally,
the question arises why the electron and the hole do not thermalize
into the lowest- energy state that does not show a difference from
the individual isolated CdSe/CdS NR.
Figure 5
Wave functions of the first eight excited
states in two connected
CdSe/CdS NRs calculated by EMA with the hole fixed to the right side
core. The external potential is shown in orange with the overall potential
including coulomb interaction in yellow and the generated wave functions
in blue.
Wave functions of the first eight excited
states in two connected
CdSe/CdS NRs calculated by EMA with the hole fixed to the right side
core. The external potential is shown in orange with the overall potential
including coulomb interaction in yellow and the generated wave functions
in blue.We explain this contradiction as follows: the excitation
with 450
nm light used in the measurements creates pairs of hot electrons and
holes that occupy higher excited states. Subsequently, the electron
and hole separate and thermalize independently, leading to either
(i) the occupation of states in different cores or (ii) direct occupation
of a delocalized higher electron state. The first case (i) would lead
to zero overlap of the electron and hole wave functions and would
not contribute to the measured fluorescence. However, as can be observed
in Figure , the second
excited electron state (E2) that is separated from the hole has an
energy very close to a bunch of higher electron states (labeled E3–E8
in Figure ), which
are all within an energy range of 10–20 meV of each other.
Thus, thermal activation of the separated electron into the delocalized
states or even a thermal mixing of all higher excited electron states
(E2–E8) is reasonable. This also includes the above-mentioned
second case (ii), direct thermalization into a delocalized (thermally
mixed) higher electron state. The wave functions of the thermally
mixed higher excited electron states should in general have a reduced
overlap with the localized hole and should thus lead to a reduced
fluorescence lifetime and/or even to a suppression of the thermalization
into the lowest excited electron state (E1).Following this
explanation, the influence of the states showing
considerable delocalization (labeled E5–E8 in Figure S7) should decrease with lower temperature, leading
to higher wave function overlap and shorter PL lifetimes. To confirm
this temperature-dependent lifetime, measurements have been carried
out as well. These indeed show a decrease in PL lifetime with lower
temperatures (see Figure S8 in the Supporting
Information) contrary to classical theory, which assumes no influence
of temperature on the radiative process and a slowing down of the
non-radiative processes leading to increased PL lifetimes. Because
we observe the opposite effect within our measurements, a different
factor influencing the lifetimes has to exist, and our above-mentioned
thermal mixing of higher excited states becomes reasonable.In this work, the possibility to couple and decouple the nanoparticle
building blocks when assembling them into a network structure is shown.
This is achieved by switching the synthesis sequence during the generation
of the network, i.e., either first generating a nanoparticle-based
network and subsequently surrounding this network with a silica shell
or first isolating the individual particles with silica shells and
subsequently embedding them into a silica-based network. The pronounced
effect of the interparticle contact on the optical properties in the
first case could be illustrated by photoluminescence spectroscopy
and further detailed with theoretical calculations. When a contact
between the particles is established before silica shell growth, the
ultralong lifetimes typical for these CdSe/CdS network structures
are visible independently of the presence of a silica shell. If the
direct contact between the semiconductor NRs is instead inhibited
by silica coating of individual particles, an increase in lifetime
can not be observed. This supports the underlying theory that electrons
can travel within such nanocrystal networks. This model was supported
by effective mass approximation simulations in combination with temperature-dependent
lifetime measurements. Our work furthermore shows that the sequence
of synthetic steps in nanochemistry is of utmost importance for controlling
the optoelectronic properties of such elaborate materials.
Experimental Methods
The preparation of the CdSe/CdS
building blocks has been described
in earlier works[30] as well as their phase
transfer,[31,32] assembly,[24] silica
modification of dispersed particles,[29] and
modification of networks.[28] It is additionally
described briefly in the Supporting Information.Optical Characterization. Absorption measurements
were performed in an Agilent Cary 5000 spectrophotometer in 3 mL quartz
cuvettes with a 10 mm path length. For the measurement of aerogels,
a DRA-2500 integrating sphere was connected to the spectrophotometer,
and the sample was mounted in reflection position. Photoluminescence
measurements were carried out in a Horiba Fluoromax-4 spectrometer
for emission and lifetime measurements. The lifetime was measured
by time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) using a NanoLED
with a 455 nm wavelength as the excitation source. Each lifetime measurement
was continued until the peak value reached 10000 counts. The measurement
of PLQY was done by absolute measurements using a Horiba Dual-FL with
a quanta-ϕ integrating sphere with an excitation wavelength
of 500 nm. Therefore, the intensity of the excitation was adjusted
to be below the detector limit, and emission spectra were measured
over the range of 300–800 nm for an empty integration
sphere and again with the sample. The difference between the integrated
area under the excitation peak in these two measurements is equivalent
to the total number of photons absorbed, while the difference in the
integrated area under the emission peak is equivalent to the number
of photons emitted. By forming the quotient of these areas, the quantum
yield was calculated. The error of the quantum yield measurement was
estimated by multiple measurements of rhodamine 6G over 14 days to
be about absolute 5%. Temperature dependent-fluorescence measurements
were carried out using an Edinburgh FLS 1000 spectrometer equipped
with an Oxford Instruments Optistat-CF cryostat cooled with liquid
helium. For this measurement, the aerogel samples were put inside
of an open quartz cuvette with a 2 mm path length, and the sample
space was flushed with helium. For time-correlated measurements, the
samples were excited by an Edinburgh EPL pulsed laser with a 445.1 nm
wavelength.Electron Microscopy. TEM samples
of nanoparticles
in solution were prepared by drop-casting diluted solutions in chloroform
onto a carbon-coated copper grid (300 mesh) by Quantifoil. For sample
preparation of aerogels, the mentioned grids were pulled along an
aerogel sample, thereby keeping small parts of gel stuck to the grid.
The measurements were carried out in an FEI Tecnai G2 F20 transmission
electron microscope with a field emission gun operated at 200 kV.SEM samples were prepared by dropping fragments of the gel onto
an adhesive carbon film and shaking off loosely attached parts. A
JEOL JSM 6700F field emission scanning electron microscope with a
2 kV acceleration voltage and a secondary electron detector at a working
distance of 8 mm was used to measure the samples.Theoretical
Calculations. The simulations were
done by self-consistently solving the Schrödinger equation
for one electron and one hole on a three-dimensional spatial grid
in a single-band effective mass approximation. The potential was composed
of the external potential formed by the band alignments and the Coulomb
potential generated for the electron by the hole and for the hole
by the electron. Electron and hole wave functions and eigenenergies
were calculated iteratively until convergence was achieved. The band
gaps of CdS and CdSe were set to 2.41 and 1.74 eV, respectively, and
the conduction band offset was set to 150 meV.
Authors: Sara Sánchez-Paradinas; Dirk Dorfs; Sebastian Friebe; Axel Freytag; Andreas Wolf; Nadja C Bigall Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Axel Freytag; Sara Sánchez-Paradinas; Suraj Naskar; Natalja Wendt; Massimo Colombo; Giammarino Pugliese; Jan Poppe; Cansunur Demirci; Imme Kretschmer; Detlef W Bahnemann; Peter Behrens; Nadja C Bigall Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Luigi Carbone; Concetta Nobile; Milena De Giorgi; Fabio Della Sala; Giovanni Morello; Pierpaolo Pompa; Martin Hytch; Etienne Snoeck; Angela Fiore; Isabella R Franchini; Monica Nadasan; Albert F Silvestre; Letizia Chiodo; Stefan Kudera; Roberto Cingolani; Roman Krahne; Liberato Manna Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Vladimir Sayevich; Bin Cai; Albrecht Benad; Danny Haubold; Luisa Sonntag; Nikolai Gaponik; Vladimir Lesnyak; Alexander Eychmüller Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Laura Altenschmidt; Sara Sánchez-Paradinas; Franziska Lübkemann; Dániel Zámbó; Abuelmagd M Abdelmonem; Henrik Bradtmüller; Atif Masood; Irene Morales; Patricia de la Presa; Alexander Knebel; Miguel Angel García García-Tuñón; Beatriz Pelaz; Karen D J Hindricks; Peter Behrens; Wolfgang J Parak; Nadja C Bigall Journal: ACS Appl Nano Mater Date: 2021-07-08