Literature DB >> 31710915

Comprehensive comparison of chemically enhanced primary treatment and high-rate activated sludge in novel wastewater treatment plant configurations.

Anton Taboada-Santos1, Enrique Rivadulla2, Lidia Paredes3, Marta Carballa4, Jesús Romalde5, Juan M Lema6.   

Abstract

Novel wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are designed to be more energy efficient than conventional plants. One approach to becoming more energy efficient is the pre-concentration of organic carbon through chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) or high-rate activated sludge (HRAS). This study compares these approaches in terms of energy demand, operational costs, organic micropollutants (OMP), and virus removal efficiency. A CEPT pilot-scale plant was operated at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 30 min, and a lab-scale HRAS reactor was operated at an HRT of 2 h and a solid retention time (SRT) of 1 d in continuous mode. A minimum dose of 150 mg/L ferric chloride (FeCl3) was required to achieve a threshold chemical oxygen demand (COD)-to-ammonium ratio below 2 g COD to 1 g of NH4+ -N (fulfilling the requirement for a partial nitritation-anammox reactor), reaching high phosphate (PO43-)-removal efficiency (>99%). A slightly lower COD recovery was attained in the HRAS reactor, due to the partial oxidation of the influent COD (15%). The lower PO43- removal efficiency achieved in the HRAS configuration (13%) was enhanced to a comparable value of that achieved in CEPT by the addition of 30 mg/L FeCl3 at the clarifier. The CEPT configuration was less energy-intensive (0.07 vs 0.13 kWh/m3 of wastewater) but had significantly higher operational costs than the HRAS-based configuration (6.0 vs 3.8 c€/m3 of wastewater). For OMPs with kbiol > 10 L/gVSS·d, considerably higher removal efficiencies were achieved in HRAS (80-90%) than in CEPT (4-55%). For the remaining OMPs, the biotransformation efficiencies were generally higher in HRAS than in CEPT but were below 55% in both configurations. Finally, CEPT was less efficient than HRAS for virus removal. HRAS followed by FeCl3 post-treatment appeared to be a more effective alternative than CEPT for COD pre-concentration in novel WWTPs.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemically enhanced primary treatment; Energy demand; High-rate activated sludge; Operational costs; Organic micropollutants; Virus removal

Year:  2019        PMID: 31710915     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparative effectiveness of membrane technologies and disinfection methods for virus elimination in water: A review.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Lihui Guo; Yu Yang; Kumiko Oguma; Li-An Hou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  The fate of SARS-COV-2 in WWTPS points out the sludge line as a suitable spot for detection of COVID-19.

Authors:  Sabela Balboa; Miguel Mauricio-Iglesias; Santiago Rodriguez; Lucía Martínez-Lamas; Francisco J Vasallo; Benito Regueiro; Juan M Lema
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Fate of Emerging Contaminants in High-Rate Activated Sludge Systems.

Authors:  Elena Koumaki; Constantinos Noutsopoulos; Daniel Mamais; Gerasimos Fragkiskatos; Andreas Andreadakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2 in sewerage and their removal: Step by step in wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Paola Foladori; Francesca Cutrupi; Maria Cadonna; Serena Manara
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Successful year-round mainstream partial nitritation anammox: Assessment of effluent quality, performance and N2O emissions.

Authors:  D Hausherr; R Niederdorfer; H Bürgmann; M F Lehmann; P Magyar; J Mohn; E Morgenroth; A Joss
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Ammonia oxidation by novel "Candidatus Nitrosacidococcus urinae" is sensitive to process disturbances at low pH and to iron limitation at neutral pH.

Authors:  Valentin Faust; Theo A van Alen; Huub J M Op den Camp; Siegfried E Vlaeminck; Ramon Ganigué; Nico Boon; Kai M Udert
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2022-10-04

7.  The novel SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Possible environmental transmission, detection, persistence and fate during wastewater and water treatment.

Authors:  Sanjeeb Mohapatra; N Gayathri Menon; Gayatree Mohapatra; Lakshmi Pisharody; Aryamav Pattnaik; N Gowri Menon; Prudhvi Lal Bhukya; Manjita Srivastava; Meenakshi Singh; Muneesh Kumar Barman; Karina Yew-Hoong Gin; Suparna Mukherji
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.