Literature DB >> 31710843

Admission Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stage stratifies post-discharge mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit patients.

Jacob C Jentzer1, David A Baran2, Sean van Diepen3, Gregory W Barsness4, Timothy D Henry5, Srihari S Naidu6, Malcolm R Bell7, David R Holmes8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The five-stage Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) cardiogenic shock classification scheme can stratify hospital mortality risk in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We sought to evaluate the SCAI shock classification for prediction of post-discharge mortality in CICU survivors.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed hospital survivors admitted to a single CICU between 2007 and 2015. SCAI CS stages A through E were classified using CICU admission data using a previously published algorithm. All-cause post-discharge mortality was compared across SCAI stages using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: Among 9096 unique hospital survivors, 43.2% had acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 44.6% had heart failure (HF), and 8.7% had cardiac arrest (CA) on admission. The proportion of patients in each SCAI shock stage was: A, 49.1%; B, 30.6%; C, 15.2; D/E 5.2%. Kaplan-Meier survival at 5 years in each SCAI shock stage was: A, 88.2%; B, 81.6%; C, 76.7%; D/E, 71.7% (P < .001 by log-rank). Each higher SCAI shock stage was associated with increased adjusted post-discharge mortality compared to SCAI shock stage A (all P < .001); results were consistent among patients with ACS or HF. Late hemodynamic deterioration after 24 hours, but not an admission diagnosis of CA, was associated with higher post-discharge mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The SCAI shock classification assessed at the time of CICU admission was predictive of post-discharge mortality risk among hospital survivors, although an admission diagnosis of CA was not. The SCAI shock classification can be used for post-discharge mortality risk stratification.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31710843     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  11 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary Code Shock Team in Cardiogenic Shock: A Canadian Centre Experience.

Authors:  Felicity Lee; Jordan H Hutson; Munir Boodhwani; Bernard McDonald; Derek So; Sophie De Roock; Fraser Rubens; Ellamae Stadnick; Marc Ruel; Michel Le May; Marino Labinaz; Kevin Chien; Habibat A Garuba; Lisa M Mielniczuk; Sharon Chih
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-03-27

2.  Cardiac safety research consortium "shock II" think tank report: Advancing practical approaches to generating evidence for the treatment of cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Marc D Samsky; Mitchell W Krucoff; David A Morrow; William T Abraham; Fernando Aguel; Andrew D Althouse; Eric Chen; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Adam D DeVore; Andrew Farb; Ian C Gilchrist; Timothy D Henry; Judith S Hochman; Navin K Kapur; Valarie Morrow; E Magnus Ohman; William W O'Neill; Ileana L Piña; Alastair G Proudfoot; John S Sapirstein; Jonathan H Seltzer; Fred Senatore; Meir Shinnar; Charles A Simonton; Behnam N Tehrani; Holger Thiele; Alexander G Truesdell; Ron Waksman; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Use of Post-Acute Care Services and Readmissions After Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiac Arrest and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Stephanie R Payne; Jacob C Jentzer; Lindsey R Sangaralingham; Kianoush Kashani; Nilay D Shah; Abhiram Prasad; Shannon M Dunlay
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-02-08

4.  Vasoactive pharmacologic therapy in cardiogenic shock: a critical review.

Authors:  Rasha Kaddoura; Amr Elmoheen; Ehab Badawy; Mahmoud F Eltawagny; Mohamed A Seif; Khalid Bashir; Amar M Salam
Journal:  J Drug Assess       Date:  2021-07-20

5.  Echocardiographic left ventricular stroke work index: An integrated noninvasive measure of shock severity.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Brandon M Wiley; Nandan S Anavekar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Stages of CS: Clinical and Translational Update.

Authors:  David A Baran; Ashleigh Long; Jacob C Jentzer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2020-11-14

7.  Age and shock severity predict mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients with and without heart failure.

Authors:  Mitchell Padkins; Thomas Breen; Nandan Anavekar; Sean van Diepen; Timothy D Henry; David A Baran; Gregory W Barsness; Kianoush Kashani; David R Holmes; Jacob C Jentzer
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-10

8.  Shock Severity Assessment in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jacob C Jentzer; Sean van Diepen; Steven M Hollenberg; Patrick R Lawler; Kianoush B Kashani
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-12-23

9.  Analysis of Cardiovascular Disease Angiography Process Based on Rough Set and Internet of Things.

Authors:  Yuesheng Gui; Jiawei Qiu; Guangming Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.682

10.  Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis.

Authors:  David A Baran; Ashleigh Long; Amit P Badiye; Kelly Stelling
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.