| Literature DB >> 31710673 |
Lara S F Konijnenberg1, Peter Damman1, Dirk J Duncker2, Robert A Kloner3,4, Robin Nijveldt1, Robert-Jan M van Geuns1, Colin Berry5,6, Niels P Riksen7, Javier Escaned8, Niels van Royen1.
Abstract
Early mechanical reperfusion of the epicardial coronary artery by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the guideline-recommended treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Successful restoration of epicardial coronary blood flow can be achieved in over 95% of PCI procedures. However, despite angiographically complete epicardial coronary artery patency, in about half of the patients perfusion to the distal coronary microvasculature is not fully restored, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The exact pathophysiological mechanism of post-ischaemic coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is still debated. Therefore, the current review discusses invasive and non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis and quantification of CMD in STEMI in the clinical setting as well as results from experimental in vitro and in vivo models focusing on ischaemic-, reperfusion-, and inflammatory damage to the coronary microvascular endothelial cells. Finally, we discuss future opportunities to prevent or treat CMD in STEMI patients.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary microvascular dysfunction; Coronary microvascular endothelial cells; Intramyocardial haemorrhage; Microvascular reperfusion injury; ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Year: 2020 PMID: 31710673 PMCID: PMC7061278 DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Res ISSN: 0008-6363 Impact factor: 10.787
Recommendations to use terminology of reperfusion injury
| Nomenclature | Definition |
|---|---|
| No-reflow |
|
| MVO |
|
| IMH |
|
| CMD | Umbrella term comprises no-reflow, MVO, IMH, and MVI |
| MVI | General term for microvascular damage after ischaemia–reperfusion |
| Reperfusion injury | General term for tissue damage after ischaemia–reperfusion (i.e. not specific for the coronary microvasculature) |
CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; IMH, intramyocardial haemorrhage; MVI, microvascular injury; MVO, microvascular obstruction.
Clinical studies investigating the association between pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors and the presence and extent of coronary microvascular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction
| Study | Variables | Measure of CMD | Main results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetes |
| Patient interview or medical record, abnormal oral glucose tolerance test, or HbA1c ≥6.5% | MCE | Categorized to MVO: no difference in diabetes and HbA1c |
|
| Known diabetes | LGE-CMR | Categorized to diabetes: no difference in presence and extent of MVO | |
|
| Known diabetes or new diagnosis with HbA1c ≥6.5% or fasting BG ≥7.0 mmol/L | MVO by T1; IMH by T2* maps | Categorized to diabetes: no difference in presence and extent of MVO or IMH | |
|
| Known diabetes or abnormal oral glucose tolerance test | LGE-CMR | Categorized to MVO: no difference in diabetes | |
|
| Known diabetes | LGE-CMR | Categorized to diabetes: no difference in presence and extent of MVO | |
| Blood glucose level (BG) |
| BG on admission; hyperglycaemia [BG ≥160 mg/dL (∼8.9 mmol/L)] | MCE | Categorized to MVO: BG was higher in MVO; BG and hyperglycaemia are independent predictors of MVO (OR 1.02 and RR 12.1) |
|
| BG on admission | LGE-CMR | Graded relationship between BG on admission and MVO | |
|
| BG on admission | LGE-CMR | BG is an independent predictor of MVO (OR 1.014) | |
|
| Hyperglycaemia (BG ≥7.8 mmol/L on admission). Diabetic patients excluded | LGE-CMR | Hyperglycaemia is an independent predictor of the presence and extent of MVO | |
| Hypertension |
| Antihypertensive treatment or ≥3 SBP values >140 mmHg on at least two different days | LGE-CMR | Categorized to hypertension: no difference in presence and extent of MVO |
|
| Antihypertensive treatment or ≥3 SBP values >140 mmHg on at least two different days | LGE-CMR, ST- resolution; IMH by T2* maps, intracoronary measurements | Pre-existing hypertension was dubious associated with IMH (OR 1.81 with CI 0.98–3.34). Blood pressure on admission was not associated with MVO | |
| Hyperchol-esteraemia |
| Previously diagnosed or total cholesterol >220 mg/dL (∼5.7 mmol/L) | MCE | Categorized to hypercholesterolaemia: no difference in incidence of no-reflow Statin pre-treatment was an independent predictor of no-reflow (OR 0.22) |
|
| Blood samples on admission | LGE-CMR | Categorized to MVI: total cholesterol and LDL were higher in MVI Hypercholesterolaemia was associated with MVI (OR 1.02 with CI 1.01–1.02) No association with statin pre-treatment and MVI | |
| Smoking |
| Regularly smoking the past 12 months | LGE-CMR; IMH by T2 | Categorized to smoking: smokers had higher incidence of IMH (31% vs 20%) but comparable MVO; smoking was associated with IMH (OR 2.13–2.17) |
|
| Patient interview | LGE-CMR; IMH is not described | Categorized to smoking: no difference in presence and extent of MVO or IMH | |
|
| ≥100 cigarettes in life and currently routinely smoking | LGE-CMR; IMH by T2* maps | Categorized to smoking: no difference in presence and extent of MVO or IMH Smoking was associated with IMH when corrected for IS (OR 2.76) |
BG, blood glucose; CI, confidence interval; IMH, intramyocardial haemorrhage; IS, infarct size; LGE-CMR, late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; LV, left ventricle; MVI, microvascular injury; MVO, microvascular obstruction; n, number; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk ratio, SBP, systolic blood pressure.