Steroid-related osteoporosis is a common side effect of steroid therapy.[1] Approximately 30% to 50% of patients experience considerable bone loss under
long-term glucocorticoid (GC) treatment.[2,3] Both the endogenous
overproduction of cortisol and chronic glucocorticoid therapy are associated with
marked bone marrow adiposity and low bone mineral density, which increase the risk
of fracture.[4] Fractures in osteoporotic individuals are associated with increased mortality
compared with that of healthy individuals; thus, steroid-related osteoporosis are
the focus of pharmaceutical therapeutics and regenerative medicine.[5]Marrow fat is reportedly increased in patients with glucocorticoid-related
osteoporosis.[6-8] High
concentrations and long durations of steroid treatment can induce bone marrow
mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to differentiate into a small number of osteoblasts
and a large number of adipocytes.[9,10] When BMSCs differentiate into
adipocytes, they can no longer be induced to differentiate into osteoblasts. The
BMSCs of glucocorticoid-related osteoporoticmice tend to differentiate into
adipocytes, but not osteoblasts.[11,12] Thus, inhibition of bone
marrow adipogenesis presumably could prevent or limit bone loss, based on the close
relationship between adipocyte and osteoblast differentiation.The process of adipocyte differentiation is regulated by many factors. PPARγ, a
master regulator of adipocyte differentiation, is closely involved in the adipocyte
differentiation of BMSCs. Overexpression of PPARγ increases adipocyte
differentiation and decreases osteoblast differentiation, which leads to increased
lipid generation and reduced bone formation.[13,14] Akune et al.[15,16] showed that
PPARγ deletion reduced marrow fat and increased bone mass. Bisphenol A diglycidyl
ether (BADGE), an antagonist of PPARγ, has been reported to inhibit adipogenesis
both in vitro and in vivo.[17,18] In mice with age-related osteoporosis, BADGE treatment resulted
in reduced marrow adipogenesis, concomitant with increasing levels of
osteoblastogenesis and bone formation.[19] Moreover, BADGE treatment improved bone formation, concomitant with reduced
marrow adiposity in rabbits with steroid-related osteonecrosis.[20] However, the effect of BADGE treatment on glucocorticoid-related osteoporosis
is unknown. This study was performed to investigate whether BADGE treatment could
prevent dexamethasone-induced bone deterioration, and to explore the potential
underlying mechanisms of this effect.
Materials and methods
Steroid-induced bone loss in mice
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan
University (no. SY02518072). Thirty-six female C57BL/6J mice (8 weeks old;
weight, 21 ± 2.4 g) were housed in a standard animal research environment with
consistent temperature and humidity; they had free access to drinking water and
food. One week after acclimation to the environment, the mice were randomly
divided into three groups—the model group (n = 12) received intraperitoneal
injections of 50 mg/kg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate (Dex), daily for 4 weeks;[21] the normal group (n = 12) received intraperitoneal injections of
phosphate-buffered saline; and the BADGE group (n = 12) received intraperitoneal
injections of 30 mg/kg of BADGE, combined with Dex, daily for 4 weeks.[22] At the endpoint, animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium and
blood samples were obtained; animals were then euthanized by an overdose of
pentobarbital sodium. Femurs were dissected from the euthanized mice for
analysis in this study.
Micro-computed tomography (µCT) analysis
Left femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and scanned with a SCANCO
MEDICAL μCT 50 (SCANCO, Brüttisellen, Zurich, Switzerland) to quantify
structural parameters. The following parameters were used: X-ray intensity,
100 kVp, 98 μA; slice thickness, 10 μm; rotation between frames, 0.9°; scanning
resolution, 1024 × 1024; exposure time, 300 ms; and scanning regions, 7 to 10 mm
of the distal femurs. Two-dimensional images of the femurs were used for
three-dimensional reconstruction. Measurements were made of the trabecular
thickness (Tb.Th), bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular number (Tb.N), and
bone volume/total volume (BV/TV).
Histopathology
After left femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours, they were
decalcified in 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and then embedded in
paraffin. The blocks of paraffin were then cut into 4-μm sections and stained
with hematoxylin and eosin. The adipocyte number (Ad.N/MV), adipocyte volume
(Ad.V/MV), and adipocyte size (Ad.Size/MV) were calculated as in the study by Ko et al.[23]
PCR analysis
Total RNA from right femurs was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed with the PrimeScript™ RT
reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Biomedical Technology, Beijing, China).
Subsequently, 2 µL cDNA was amplified by using the StepOne™ Real-Time PCR kit
(Life Technologies, Beijing, China), in the TC-XP thermocycler (BIOER
TECHNOLOGY, Hangzhou, China); primers were specific for the following genes:
PPARγ: forward, 5'-TGTCTCACAATGCCATCAGGT-3' and reverse, 5'-TGTGATCTCTTGCACGGCTT-3';
aP2 (FABP4): forward, 5'-TTGGTCACCATCCGGTCAGA-3' and reverse,
5'-CATTCCACCACCAGCTTGTCA-3'; Runx2: forward,
5'-GCGGTGCAAACTTTCTCCAG-3' and reverse, 5'-ACCCAGTCCCTGTTTTAGTTGT-3'; and
osteocalcin (OCN): forward,
5'-CCTTGGGTTCTGACTGGGTG-3' and reverse, 5'-GGCCACTTACCCAAGGTAGC-3'.
β-actin served as the internal standard. Relative gene
expression levels were quantified using the ΔΔCt method.
Western blot
Total protein from right femurs was crushed under liquid nitrogen conditions and
prepared in ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer. Protein extracts were resolved by using
15% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were
blocked with 10% non-fat milk, then incubated with primary antibodies overnight
at 4°C; this was followed by incubation at room temperature with horseradish
peroxidase-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000 dilution in 5% skim milk;
Cat. No. AS1058; Aspen, Wuhan, China). Protein blots were analyzed using an
image analysis system (AlphaEaseFC; Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA,
USA). An anti-β-actin antibody was used as a loading control (ab37168, 1:10,000
dilution in 5% skim milk; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). The primary antibodies
used were anti-PPARγ (ab59256, 1:500 dilution in 5% skim milk), anti-OCN
(ab23981, 1:1000 dilution in 5% skim milk), and anti-RUNX2 (ab93876, 1:500
dilution in 5% skim milk) (Abcam).
ELISA
To evaluate the levels of bone resorption and formation markers in all mice,
serum levels of mouseOCN and C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX-1)
were measured with ELISA kits (Bio-Swamp, Wuhan, China), in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
For comparison, two-tailed t-test or one-way analysis of variance were conducted
using Prism 6.01 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The
Student–Newman–Keuls method was used for multiple comparisons among groups. Data
are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences with P < 0.05
were considered statistically significant.
Results
BADGE treatment ameliorated glucocorticoid-induced bone mass loss
μCT analyses showed that Dex treatment led to significantly reduced trabecular
BV/TV and BMD, as well as reduced Tb.N and Tb.th (Figure 1a,b). Thus, BADGE treatment
improved BMD and trabecular BV/TV, while ameliorating the cortical bone
reduction and bone mass loss, compared with those parameters in the model group
(P < 0.05 for all comparisons, Figure 1a,b).
Figure 1.
BADGE ameliorates glucocorticoid induced bone mass loss. (a)
Representative two-dimensional reconstruction of the femur. (b)
Micro-computed tomography revealed that, compared with the normal group,
dexamethasone treatment reduced Tb.Th, BV/TV, BMD, and Tb.N. Compared
with the model group, BADGE treatment significantly increased trabecular
BV/TV and BMD (n = 10). #P < 0.05 vs. model group and
*P < 0.05 vs. normal group. BADGE, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether;
Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; BV/TV, bone volume/total volume; BMD, bone
mineral density; Tb.N, trabecular number.
BADGE ameliorates glucocorticoid induced bone mass loss. (a)
Representative two-dimensional reconstruction of the femur. (b)
Micro-computed tomography revealed that, compared with the normal group,
dexamethasone treatment reduced Tb.Th, BV/TV, BMD, and Tb.N. Compared
with the model group, BADGE treatment significantly increased trabecular
BV/TV and BMD (n = 10). #P < 0.05 vs. model group and
*P < 0.05 vs. normal group. BADGE, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether;
Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; BV/TV, bone volume/total volume; BMD, bone
mineral density; Tb.N, trabecular number.
BADGE treatment reduced glucocorticoid-induced bone marrow fat
As shown in Figure 2a and
b, more fat cells accumulated in the bone marrow in the
steroid-treated group than in the normal group. Thus, BADGE treatment
ameliorated glucocorticoid-induced marrow adiposity.
Figure 2.
BADGE treatment reduces glucocorticoid-induced bone marrow fat. (a)
Images captured at original magnifications of ×20. In the model group,
many fat cells accumulated in the bone marrow, whereas BADGE treatment
significantly reduced the volume of marrow fat. (b) BADGE treatment
reduced Ad.Size/MV, Ad.V/MV, and Ad.N/MV, which were promoted by
dexamethasone in bone tissue. #P < 0.05 vs. model group
and *P < 0.05 vs. normal group. BADGE, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether;
Ad.Size/MV, adipocyte size; Ad.V/MV, adipocyte volume; Ad.N/MV,
adipocyte number.
BADGE treatment reduces glucocorticoid-induced bone marrow fat. (a)
Images captured at original magnifications of ×20. In the model group,
many fat cells accumulated in the bone marrow, whereas BADGE treatment
significantly reduced the volume of marrow fat. (b) BADGE treatment
reduced Ad.Size/MV, Ad.V/MV, and Ad.N/MV, which were promoted by
dexamethasone in bone tissue. #P < 0.05 vs. model group
and *P < 0.05 vs. normal group. BADGE, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether;
Ad.Size/MV, adipocyte size; Ad.V/MV, adipocyte volume; Ad.N/MV,
adipocyte number.
BADGE treatment increased expression levels of osteogenic markers,
concomitant with reduced expression levels of adipogenic markers
As shown in Figure 3,
compared with the normal group, Dex treatment increased the expression levels of
adipogenic markers PPARγ and aP2, but reduced the expression levels of
osteogenic markers Runx2 and osteocalcin. The BADGE group exhibited increased
expression levels of Runx2 and OCN, as well as reduced expression levels of
PPARγ at both the protein and mRNA levels, compared with the model group
(P < 0.05 for all comparisons). The mRNA expression level of
aP2 was also significantly reduced in the BADGE group,
compared with the model group (P < 0.05).
Figure 3.
BADGE treatment increases the expression levels of osteogenic markers and
reduces the expression levels of adipogenic markers. (a) BADGE treatment
significantly reduced mRNA expression levels of PPARγ and
aP2 (n = 12). (b) BADGE treatment increased mRNA
expression levels of OCN and Runx2
(n = 12). (c, d) Compared with the model group, BADGE treatment reduced
the protein expression level of PPARγ and increased the protein
expression levels of OCN and Runx2. *P < 0.05 vs. normal group and
#P < 0.05 vs. model group. BADGE, bisphenol A
diglycidyl ether; OCN, osteocalcin.
BADGE treatment increases the expression levels of osteogenic markers and
reduces the expression levels of adipogenic markers. (a) BADGE treatment
significantly reduced mRNA expression levels of PPARγ and
aP2 (n = 12). (b) BADGE treatment increased mRNA
expression levels of OCN and Runx2
(n = 12). (c, d) Compared with the model group, BADGE treatment reduced
the protein expression level of PPARγ and increased the protein
expression levels of OCN and Runx2. *P < 0.05 vs. normal group and
#P < 0.05 vs. model group. BADGE, bisphenol Adiglycidyl ether; OCN, osteocalcin.
BADGE treatment reduced the level of bone resorption marker concomitant with
increased level of bone formation marker
We analyzed the effects of BADGE on the serum levels of a total bone resorption
marker, CTX-1, and a bone formation marker, OCN. As shown in Figure 4, compared with
the normal group, Dex treatment increased the serum level of CTX-1 and reduced
the serum level of OCN. BADGE treatment significantly reduced the serum level of
CTX-1 and increased the serum level of OCN, compared with the model group
(P < 0.05). The increased bone mass with BADGE treatment was demonstrated to
partly result from increased bone formation, concomitant with inhibition of bone
resorption.
Figure 4.
BADGE treatment reduces the serum level of CTX-1 while increasing the
serum level of OCN. Compared with the normal group, the serum level of
CTX-1 was higher and the serum level of OCN was lower in the model group
(P < 0.05). BADGE treatment reduced the serum level of CTX-1 and
increased the serum level of OCN, compared with the model group (n = 12
for all analyses). #P < 0.05 vs. model group and
*P < 0.05 vs. normal group. BADGE, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether; OCN,
osteocalcin; CTX-1, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen
BADGE treatment reduces the serum level of CTX-1 while increasing the
serum level of OCN. Compared with the normal group, the serum level of
CTX-1 was higher and the serum level of OCN was lower in the model group
(P < 0.05). BADGE treatment reduced the serum level of CTX-1 and
increased the serum level of OCN, compared with the model group (n = 12
for all analyses). #P < 0.05 vs. model group and
*P < 0.05 vs. normal group. BADGE, bisphenol A diglycidyl ether; OCN,
osteocalcin; CTX-1, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen
Discussion
In the current study, BADGE, a PPARγ inhibitor, was found to ameliorate
steroid-induced osteoporosis in a mouse model. BADGE treatment increased bone mass,
concomitant with reduced infiltration of marrow fat. Expression levels of osteogenic
markers were increased, whereas expression levels of adipogenic markers were
reduced. Moreover, BADGE treatment reduced the serum level of CTX-1 and increased
the serum level of OCN.Zhang et al.[24] demonstrated that BMSCs derived from osteoporoticmice had significantly
lower osteogenesis potential and higher adipogenesis potential, compared with those
parameters in normal BMSCs; moreover, human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC)-derived
osteoblasts co-cultured with hMSC-derived adipocytes expressed typical amounts of
adipogenic genes, but low amounts of osteogenic markers. Martin et al.[25] showed that human MSC-derived adipocytes secrete extracellular vesicles that
can be transferred to osteoblasts; these vesicles contain anti-osteogenic miRNAs and
adipocyte-specific mRNAs.PPARγ stimulates adipogenesis at the expense of osteoblastogenesis.[26] PPARγ deletion induces high bone mass and low marrow fat,[15] while activation of PPARγ can induce bone loss and stimulate bone marrow
adiposity.[27,28] Steroid treatment reportedly increases the gene expression of
PPARγ, both in vivo and in vitro.[10] BADGE treatment inhibits adipogenesis and reduces fatty marrow;[17,18] notably, BADGE
treatment has been shown to increase osteoblastogenesis in mouse bone marrow stromal
cells in vitro. Gustavo et al.[17] indicated that BADGE treatment increased bone mass and osteoblastogenesis in
C57BL/6 mice. However, Li et al.[29] reported that early BADGE treatment could not increase bone formation in
ovariectomized rats, although it could reduce marrow adiposity. Recently, Yuan et al.[20] reported that BADGE treatment improved bone formation, concomitant with
reduced marrow adiposity, in a rabbit model of steroid-related osteonecrosis. In the
current study of mice with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, we found that BADGE
treatment increased bone mass and reduced marrow fat infiltration. Importantly,
BADGE treatment increased the expression levels of Runx2 and OCN, while reducing the
expression levels of PPARγ and aP2.Glucocorticoid treatment increased the serum level of CTX-1 and reduced the level of
OCN, a bone formation marker.[4] Zhu et al.[30] reported that adipocytes differentiated from BMSCs significantly promoted
osteoclast formation. Wan and colleagues reported that PPARγ regulates
osteoclastogenesis in mice, and that PPARγ deletion reduced osteoclast
differentiation. Treatment with antagonists of PPARγ, such as GW9662 and T0070907,
reduced osteoclast gene expression. In contrast, osteoclast differentiation was
increased by treatment with rosiglitazone, an agonist of PPAR-γ.[31] However, Zhao et al.[32] reported that both rosiglitazone and pioglitazone treatment inhibited
osteoclastogenesis in a dose-dependent manner. In the current study, we also
analyzed the effects of BADGE treatment on serum levels of CTX-1 and OCN. We found
that dexamethasone treatment reduced the serum level of OCN and increased the serum
level of CTX-1. Compared with the model group, BADGE treatment reduced the serum
level of CTX-1 and increased the serum level of OCN. However, we could not
distinguish whether BADGE reduced bone resorption markers through effective
suppression of fatty marrow or by directly affecting osteoclast differentiation in
bone. Further studies are needed to identify the direct effects of BADGE treatment
on osteoclast differentiation.A limitation of our study was that it assessed the preventive effect of BADGE
treatment on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, but did not assess its treatment
effect. Further studies are thus needed to determine the treatment effect of BADGE
on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. BADGE may be effective for clinical
prevention or treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in the near
future.Taken together, our data showed that the inhibition of PPARγ by BADGE ameliorated
glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. BADGE treatment increased bone mass,
concomitant with reduced infiltration of marrow fat. Treatment with BADGE increased
the transcription of osteogenic genes and reduced the transcription of adipogenic
genes. Moreover, BADGE administration reduced the serum level of the bone resorption
marker, CTX-1, and increased the serum level of the bone formation marker, OCN,
which may have contributed to the increase in bone mass.
Authors: H M Wright; C B Clish; T Mikami; S Hauser; K Yanagi; R Hiramatsu; C N Serhan; B M Spiegelman Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-01-21 Impact factor: 5.157