BACKGROUND: Normal healing process becomes severely dysregulated in pathophysiological conditions such as inflammation, infection or underlaying diseases. These scenarios hamper the standard healing pattern and dermal fibrotic tissue develops. OBJECTIVE: In the present study a novel three-dimensional formulation (Endoret-Gel) based on plasma rich in growth factors technology (Endoret-PRGF) has been assessed for atrophic scar management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microstructure analysis, growth factor content, and projection capacity of both formulations (Endoret-Gel and Endoret-PRGF) was assessed. Additionally, a clinical evaluation of Endoret-Gel treatment was also performed in a case of an extense atrophic scar. RESULTS: Endoret-Gel presented high molecular weight plasmatic proteins that formed solid thermal aggregates enclosed by a stable fibrin network. This formulation has a higher cutaneous projection capacity compared with Endoret-PRGF. Both formulations presented a high load of bioactive proteins such as EGF, PDGF-AB, and IGF-I being higher in liquid Endoret-PRGF. Clinical results evidenced that infiltrations of Endoret-Gel derived in an early volumetric disposal that was maintained for several months. The treatment provided and immediate soft tissue augmentation and scar amelioration effect that was translated into a noticeable clinical improvement of the injury. No side effects or adverse events were reported during ten-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that Endoret-Gel may act not only as a temporary volumizer but also as soft tissue stimulator that might be used as a monotherapy for scar management.
BACKGROUND: Normal healing process becomes severely dysregulated in pathophysiological conditions such as inflammation, infection or underlaying diseases. These scenarios hamper the standard healing pattern and dermal fibrotic tissue develops. OBJECTIVE: In the present study a novel three-dimensional formulation (Endoret-Gel) based on plasma rich in growth factors technology (Endoret-PRGF) has been assessed for atrophic scar management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microstructure analysis, growth factor content, and projection capacity of both formulations (Endoret-Gel and Endoret-PRGF) was assessed. Additionally, a clinical evaluation of Endoret-Gel treatment was also performed in a case of an extense atrophic scar. RESULTS: Endoret-Gel presented high molecular weight plasmatic proteins that formed solid thermal aggregates enclosed by a stable fibrin network. This formulation has a higher cutaneous projection capacity compared with Endoret-PRGF. Both formulations presented a high load of bioactive proteins such as EGF, PDGF-AB, and IGF-I being higher in liquid Endoret-PRGF. Clinical results evidenced that infiltrations of Endoret-Gel derived in an early volumetric disposal that was maintained for several months. The treatment provided and immediate soft tissue augmentation and scar amelioration effect that was translated into a noticeable clinical improvement of the injury. No side effects or adverse events were reported during ten-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that Endoret-Gel may act not only as a temporary volumizer but also as soft tissue stimulator that might be used as a monotherapy for scar management.