Literature DB >> 31709284

Dataset on infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction patterns of Mg-Al layered double hydroxides by the electrocoagulation technique.

Marena Molano-Mendoza1, Dayana Donneys-Victoria1, Nilson Marriaga-Cabrales1, Miguel Angel Mueses2, Gianluca Li Puma3, Fiderman Machuca-Martínez1.   

Abstract

The XRD profiles and FTIR analysis of sludge aggregates, Mg-Al layered double hydroxides, produced during electrocoagulation processes are presented. The data describes the composition of materials (LDH) produced at different operations conditions (atmospheric conditions and Mg2+/Al3+ ratio). The data show the diffraction peaks of (003), (006), (018) and (110) crystal planes for hydrotalcite structure.
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Al and AZ31 magnesium alloy electrodes; Electrochemical synthesis; Electrocoagulation; Layered double hydroxides

Year:  2019        PMID: 31709284      PMCID: PMC6833444          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table The data set shows the methodology to obtain Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs) through electrocoagulation (EC) method varying atmospheric conditions and M2+/M3+ ratio. X-ray characterization discloses a “classical” 2H-polytype (Magnesite) of LDHs as well as common LDHs impurities. FTIR analysis indicates some interesting stretching and bending bonds that can have an effect on the type of material. The EC method can guide other researchers toward designing multifunctional LDHs by using other metal electrodes (Zn, Fe, Co) for environmental applications such as water/ground remediation, solar energy storage or conversion and catalysis support.

Data

The electrochemical method for the synthesis of Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs) by electrocoagulation is used as an alternative procedure [1]. The LDHs are a class of anionic clays which have observed increasing attention due to their applications in many research areas [2]. Therefore, physicochemical properties of HDL materials, mainly explored from X-ray diffraction and FTIR analysis, disclose their more specific applications. The dataset presents LDH characteristics prepared by electrocoagulation varying atmospheric conditions and Mg2+/Al3+ ratio. Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 show the diffraction peaks of (003), (006), (018) and (110) crystal planes for hydrotalcite structure. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 describe information on the phases and hkl -diffraction planes. Table 7 shows the band positions in the FTIR spectra. Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12 displays the functional groups and bonding information. Table 8 exhibits the LDH-material specifications.
Fig. 1

XRD pattern of the AZ31-AZ31-1 material.

Fig. 2

XRD pattern of the AZ31-Al-N2-1 material.

Fig. 3

XRD pattern of the AZ31-Al-N2-3 material.

Fig. 4

XRD pattern of the HTX3-1 material.

Fig. 5

XRD pattern of the MgHP-1 material.

Fig. 6

XRD pattern of the MgHP-2 material.

Table 1

X-ray diffraction planes related to the AZ31-AZ31_(1)_MMH material.

Magnesium Aluminium Hydroxide Carbonate Hydrate (0.5%)
Hydrotalcite (0.5%)
Carbon (97.6%)
Magnesite (1.2%)
Doyleite (0.2%)
JCPDS: 98-004-0937Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-000-6183Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-003-1976Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-006-6643Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-004-9607Lattice parameters (Å):
a3.0810a3.054a14.26a4.314a4.983
b3.0810b3.054b14.26b4.314b5.000
c
23.784
c
22.81
c
14.26
c
12.775
c
5.168
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
11.1540 0 311.6300 0 310.7371 1 137.001 0 418.5600 0 1
22.4090 0 623.3820 0 617.5780 2 247.1921 1 320.7311 -1 0
34.4190 1 234.0981 0 120.6431 1 361.1051 1 621.2631 0 0
36.8921 0 434.7920 1 221.5702 2 263.2760 1 821.7230 1 0
38.6570 1 535.3900 0 935.5830 4 422.9260 1 -1
45.6510 1 837.4551 0 437.2731 3 523.7791 0 -1
45.7380 0 1239.3430 1 537.8250 0 635.5261 1 -1
61.2431 1 346.8110 1 839.9560 2 636.0020 1 -2
61.3931 0 1360.5931 1 045.3821 1 737.1141 -2 1
60.8680 0 1545.8500 4 637.6370 0 2
61.9331 1 347.6872 4 638.7662 -1 -1
63.5961 0 1360.8934 6 646.0311 -2 2
62.0331 3 946.2421 -2 -1
63.9104 4 860.1632 -2 -2
61.9202 0 -3
63.8651 -1 -3
Table 2

X-ray diffraction planes related to the Al-AZ31_N2 material.

Carbon dioxide (0.2%)
Hydrotalcite (0.3%)
Nitrogen oxide (0.2%)
Magnesium zinc (98.3%)
Sodium carbide (0.3%)
Magnesite (0.7%)
JCPDS: 98-000-4494Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-004-0936Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-000-7431Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-007-4545Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-005-6296Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-006-6646Lattice parameters (Å):
a5.624a3.046a5.67A14.025A6.756a4.278
b5.624b3.046b5.67B14.083B6.756b4.278
c
5.624
c
22.77
c
5.67
C
14.486
C
6.756
c
12.546
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
27.4471 1 111.6460 0 327.2201 1 112.2100 0 222.7771 1 127.9470 1 2
35.6680 2 123.4210 0 631.5310 0 212.5620 2 037.6260 2 237.5401 0 4
39.2061 1 234.1941 0 135.3680 2 112.6112 0 061.3120 2 447.7161 1 3
48.5251 2 234.8820 1 238.8751 1 221.6742 2 262.0151 1 6
61.6571 2 335.4470 0 948.1051 2 223.2011 2 364.4690 1 8
37.5461 0 461.1051 2 323.2232 1 3
39.4460 1 523.4371 3 2
46.9220 1 823.6353 2 1
47.8990 0 1226.8933 3 0
60.7681 1 027.6750 2 4
60.9800 0 1528.1580 4 2
62.1091 1 329.4092 3 3
71.6080 2 134.0411 2 5
72.0202 0 235.6114 0 4
72.3601 1 936.4100 3 5
37.2393 5 0
38.7033 2 5
39.4230 2 6
39.5446 1 1
45.4810 7 1
45.7037 1 0
46.1482 1 7
46.7752 5 5
48.3596 4 2
Table 3

X-ray diffraction planes related to the AZ31-Al-N23 material.

Hydrotalcite (20.4%)
Carbon dioxide (15.0%)
Brucite (1.1%)
Sodium Carbonate (15.4%)
Magnesite (48.1%)
JCPDS:98-000-6183Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-001-3442Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-004-4736Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-003-6631Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-006-6646Lattice parameters (Å):
a3.054a5.63a3.148a5.208a4.278
b3.054b5.63b3.148b5.208b4.278
c
22.810
c
5.63
c
4.779
c
6.454
c
12.546
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
11.6300 0 327.4141 1 118.5490 0 127.6190 0 227.9470 1 2
23.3820 0 635.6280 2 137.6140 0 234.1370 1 237.5401 0 4
34.0981 0 139.1601 1 237.9670 1 134.4131 1 047.7161 1 3
35.39000 0 961.5881 2 362.0271 1 139.9450 2 062.0151 1 6
46.8110 1 846.7460 1 364.4690 1 8
60.5931 1 049.2520 2 2
60.8680 0 1560.9360 1 4
61.9331 1 361.4681 2 2
61.6440 3 0
Table 4

X-ray diffraction planes related to the HTX3_1 material.

Hydrotalcite (12.7%)
Halite (12.5%)
Brucite (0.7%)
Gibbsite (74.1%)
JCPDS: 98-000-6183Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-011-6223Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-003-4961Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-008-2783Lattice parameters (Å):
a3.054a5.653a3.148a5.052
b3.054b5.653b3.148b9.495
c
22.81
c
5.653
c
4.772
c
8.686
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
11.6300 0 327.3031 1 118.5770 0 118.6750 2 0
23.3820 0 631.6320 0 237.6710 0 222.3931 1 1
34.7920 1 245.3410 2 237.9790 1 127.0541 0 2
35.3900 0 962.0401 1 127.7361 2 1
37.4551 0 427.8190 2 2
39.3430 1 528.6691 1 2
46.8110 1 834.9841 3 1
47.8100 0 1235.5092 0 0
60.5931 1 036.9891 1 3
60.8680 0 1537.8710 4 0
61.9331 1 338.2692 1 1
39.3150 4 1
60.5801 4 4
62.0152 5 1
62.4932 4 3
Table 5

X-ray diffraction planes related to the MgHP-1 material.

Zinc Aluminium Hydroxide Chloride Hydrate (7.6%)
Magnesite (12.3%)
Diamond (2.3%)
Sodium carbide (40.0%)
Hydrotalcite (5.2%)
Gibbsite (32.4%)
JCPDS: 98-005-8141Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-006-6646Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-005-4252Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-005-6291Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-000-6183Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-011-2963Lattice parameters (Å):
a3.083a4.278a4.591a6.778a3.054a8.675
b3.083b4.278b4.591b6.778b3.054b5.069
c
23.47
c
12.546
c
4.591
c
12.74
c
22.81
c
12.508
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
11.30 0 327.9470 1 239.21200223.2061 1 211.6300 0 318.2870 0 2
22.7110 0 637.5401 0 448.53611227.9910 0 423.3820 0 620.2931 1 -1
34.3630 0 947.7161 1 336.3871 2 334.7920 1 222.6181 1 -2
38.7720 1 562.0151 1 637.5012 2 035.3900 0 927.9971 1 -3
45.9200 1 864.4690 1 838.7660 2 437.4551 0 428.0912 1 -1
58.9830 0 1546.7581 1 639.3430 1 528.6861 0 2
62.0021 0 1347.4392 2 446.8110 1 828.7142 0 -4
48.9392 3 147.8100 0 1231.6493 0 2
50.6970 2 660.5931 1 035.1591 1 4
61.0932 4 060.8680 0 1535.3850 2 0
61.2242 3 561.9331 1 335.8093 1 3
61.4121 3 663.5861 0 1338.3271 2 -2
61.9830 4 440.1170 2 2
64.6100 2 840.2492 1 -5
45.4400 2 -3
47.1751 0 4
47.2874 1 -5
50.5123 1 1
58.6122 3 -2
60.4684 2 -6
64.6166 0 -6
72.2371 1 -8
Table 6

X-ray diffraction planes related to the MgHP_Al_2 material.

Magnesium Zinc (98.5%)
Magnesium Aluminium Hydroxide Carbonate Hydrate (0.3%)
Hydrotalcite (0.3%)
Sodium Carbonate (0.9%)
JCPDS: 98-007-4545Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-004-0937Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-00-61-83Lattice parameters (Å):JCPDS: 98-003-6621Lattice parameters (Å):
a14.025a3.045a3.054a9.015
b14.083b3.045b3.054b5.209
c
14.48
c
22.701
c
22.81
c
6.405
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
2 Theta degree
Hkl
12.2100 0 211.6840 0 311.6300 0 323.4152 0 -1
12.5620 2 023.4920 0 623.3820 0 623.7621 1 -1
17.8352 2 034.2051 0 134.0981 0 127.8970 0 2
23.2011 2 337.5801 0 434.7920 1 234.4080 2 0
23.2232 1 339.4860 1 535.3900 0 935.4642 0 2
23.4923 1 248.0580 0 1237.4551 0 436.5573 1 -1
27.6750 2 460.7861 1 039.3430 1 538.0703 1 1
28.4134 2 061.1930 0 1547.8100 0 1247.8934 0 -2
34.7411 5 262.1401 1 360.5931 1 050.2442 2 2
40.6336 2 072.0532 0 260.8680 0 1555.6920 2 -3
45.3354 5 361.9331 1 358.62 2 -3
46.5234 6 072.1601 1 960.7302 2 3
47.3101 7 271.2031 3 3
48.3596 4 2
50.2385 1 6
Table 7

Positions of the bands (in cm-1) in the IR spectra (Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12) [4,5].

Vibration/AssignmentMaterial
AZ31-AZ31-1AZ31-Al-N2AZ31AlN2-3HTX3-1MgHP-1MgHP-2
Water and hydroxyl groupsOH stretching3694.943693.01
Bending3459.673443.283443.283450.993216.683465.46
Adsorbed water1641.131639.21639.21641.131646.911642.09
NitrogenN–H stretching2095.282095.282098.172100.12101.06
CarbonatesC = O1475.281501.311501.311508.06
v3asymmetric stretching1364.391363.431363.21364.391360.531365.35
1267
675.93
V1symmetrical stretching1032.691069.331069.331073.191087.661075.12
OthersAl–O and Mg–O deformation1188.91175.4
Mg–O639.2
557.33598.80589.15544.79
Mg–O447.40452.22452.22412.692
Mg–O378.94367.37
Fig. 7

IR Spectrum of the AZ31-AZ31-1 material.

Fig. 8

IR Spectrum of the AZ31-AL-N2-1 material.

Fig. 9

IR Spectrum of the AZ31-AL-N2-3 material.

Fig. 10

IR Spectrum of the HTX3-1 material.

Fig. 11

IR Spectrum of the MgHP-1 material.

Fig. 12

IR Spectrum of the MgHP-2 material.

Table 8

Sample specifications.

SampleElectrodesCurrent (A)Temperature (°C)Sodium Chloride (ppm)Nitrogen gasMg2+/Al3+ ratio
AZ31-AZ31-1AZ31-AZ310.515050002/1
AZ31-Al-N2-1AZ31-AZ310.51505000X2/1
AZ31-Al-N2-3AZ31-Al0.51505000X3/1
HTX3-1AZ31-Al0.51505000
MgAl-1Mg–Al0.515050002/1
MgAl-2Mg–Al0.515050002/1
XRD pattern of the AZ31-AZ31-1 material. XRD pattern of the AZ31-Al-N2-1 material. XRD pattern of the AZ31-Al-N2-3 material. XRD pattern of the HTX3-1 material. XRD pattern of the MgHP-1 material. XRD pattern of the MgHP-2 material. X-ray diffraction planes related to the AZ31-AZ31_(1)_MMH material. X-ray diffraction planes related to the Al-AZ31_N2 material. X-ray diffraction planes related to the AZ31-Al-N23 material. X-ray diffraction planes related to the HTX3_1 material. X-ray diffraction planes related to the MgHP-1 material. X-ray diffraction planes related to the MgHP_Al_2 material. Positions of the bands (in cm-1) in the IR spectra (Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12) [4,5]. IR Spectrum of the AZ31-AZ31-1 material. IR Spectrum of the AZ31-AL-N2-1 material. IR Spectrum of the AZ31-AL-N2-3 material. IR Spectrum of the HTX3-1 material. IR Spectrum of the MgHP-1 material. IR Spectrum of the MgHP-2 material. Sample specifications.

X-ray diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the materials were measured using an X'pert PRO-PANalytical diffractometer with CuKα radiation (λ = 0.1542nm). The data were collected in the 2ʘ range of 4–90°. Determination of the phases and diffraction planes were determined using X'pert PRO-PANalytical software [3]. In every case, hydrotalcite composite was showed. Some XRD and FTIR patterns of the composites were similar to those reported in the literature for hydrotalcite materials [4].

Infrared spectroscopy

The FTIR analysis was carried out in the spectral range (500–4000) cm−1 by a Jasco FTIR-4100 spectrometer with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The Fig. 7, Fig. 8, Fig. 9, Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 12 represent the FTIR spectrum of composites and different vibrations attribution of the composites are represented in Table 7.

Experimental design, materials and methods

The experimental procedure is described details by Molano-Mendoza [1]. Here the protocol is provided for nitrogen experiments, giving details that were omitted from previous research article. Electrocoagulation experiments were conducted in a batch mode, using synthetic chloride solutions as supporting electrolyte. A 5.000 mg L-1 of Sodium Chloride solution was prepared by the dissolution of Sodium Chloride (AR grade) in deionized water giving an overall final conductivity of 8.4 μsˑcm−1. This solution was left to dissolve for 10 min. For nitrogen experiments, the beaker was covered and stirred with a speed of 100-rpm for 3.15 h. The sample was dried in a conventional oven for 2 h at 110 °C. The dried samples were then crushed into a fine powder using a ceramic mortar/bowl. The electrocoagulation unit consisted on two plates that worked as anodes and cathodes, AZ31 magnesium alloy, Mg or aluminum, with an immersed area of 46.6 cm2 each. The distance between electrodes was 5 mm, and the solution was mixing at 100 rpm using a hot magnetic plate mixer machine. Electrodes were connected to a DC power supply and the appropriate amount of the trivalent and divalent cations were carefully added to the beaker by a manual polarity inverter unit at an applied current of 0.36 and 0.15 mA. The Mg2+/Al3+ ratio and the operating time were calculated based on Faraday's law, assuming that electro-dissolution only occurs at the anode. Before testing, electrodes were subjected to dry abrasion with emery paper No. 600 and then with abrasive paper No. 1000. Afterwards, the electrodes were rinsed with distilled water for approximately 5 min to remove traces (Table 8 describes the experimental conditions). The following units were obtained beforehand and thoroughly cleaned: Digital scale Glass beaker (size: 1000 ml) Magnetic hotplate stirrer Spatula Al, Mg and AZ31 alloy electrode plates Sodium Chloride, AR grade Nitrogen (N2) gas pipeline DI water Ceramic mortar/bowl Emery paper No. 600 and abrasive paper No. 1000

Specifications Table

Subject areaChemical Engineering
More specific subject areaLamellar materials
Type of dataTable, image, graph, figure
How data was acquiredX-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded using a X'pert PRO – PANalytical diffractometer under the following conditions: 45 kV, 40 mA, monochromatic CuKα radiation (λ = 0.1542 nm) over a in the 2θ range from of 4° to -90°. The FTIR spectra was recorded with a JASCO FT/IR-4100 over a frequency in a range of 500-4000 cm-1. The samples were prepared by mixing the powdered solids with KBr.
Data formatRaw data are tabulated and analyzed
Experimental factorsThe XRD and FTIR analysis were performed according to the LDHs typical characterization
Experimental featuresThe LDH materials were prepared by electrocoagulation method with varying operations conditions and M2+/M3+ratio
Data source locationUniversidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
Data accessibilityThe data are presented in this article
Related research articleM. Molano-Mendoza, D. Donneys-Victoria, N. Marriaga-Cabrales, M. A. Mueses, G. Li Puma and F. Machuca-Martínez, Synthesis of Mg–Al layered double hydroxides by electrocoagulation, MethodsX, Volume 5, pp. 915–923, 2018.
Value of the Data

The data set shows the methodology to obtain Layered Double Hydroxides (LDHs) through electrocoagulation (EC) method varying atmospheric conditions and M2+/M3+ ratio.

X-ray characterization discloses a “classical” 2H-polytype (Magnesite) of LDHs as well as common LDHs impurities. FTIR analysis indicates some interesting stretching and bending bonds that can have an effect on the type of material.

The EC method can guide other researchers toward designing multifunctional LDHs by using other metal electrodes (Zn, Fe, Co) for environmental applications such as water/ground remediation, solar energy storage or conversion and catalysis support.

  1 in total

1.  Synthesis of Mg-Al layered double hydroxides by electrocoagulation.

Authors:  Marena Molano-Mendoza; Dayana Donneys-Victoria; Nilson Marriaga-Cabrales; Miguel Angel Mueses; Gianluca Li Puma; Fiderman Machuca-Martínez
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2018-08-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.