Over the past few decades, organosulfonate and organocarboxylate anions have become popular building blocks for metal-organic framework (MOF) structures (Dey et al., 2014 ▸; Shimizu et al., 2009 ▸; Cai, 2004 ▸). Having previously investigated some structures of the bifunctional 4-sulfobenzoic acid anion (Gunderman & Squattrito, 1994 ▸), we recently decided to examine its interactions with some softer (and therefore sulfophilic) late transition metals. Reactions with Cu2+ and Ag+ were carried out that resulted in four new structures that are described herein.
Structural commentary
The aqueous reaction of copper(II) carbonate, potassium 4-sulfobenzoic acid, and hydrochloric acid produced two copper-containing products. Blue parallelepiped-shaped crystals were found to have the formula [Cu(H2O)4(O3SC6H4CO2H)2]·2H2O, (I). The structure finds the Cu2+ ions on centers of inversion with four closely bound water molecules [Cu—O distances of 1.9520 (7) and 1.9743 (7) Å] in a square plane [O6—Cu1—O7 angle of 90.38 (3)°] (Fig. 1 ▸). Two sulfonate O atoms at 2.3934 (8) Å occupy the apical positions to complete a classic Jahn–Teller-distorted octahedral coordination of the copper ion. This type of bis(sulfanato)copper(II) complex with the sulfonate ligands in the more distant apical position has been reported by Cai et al. (2001 ▸) with Cu—O distances ca 0.1–0.4 Å longer than the Cu1—O4 distance in (I). A comparable Cu—O sulfonate distance of 2.420 (2) Å is seen in bis(4-aminobenzenesulfonato)diaquacopper(II) (Gunderman et al., 1996 ▸). The second product of the reaction, blue needles, was determined to be [Cu(H2O)6](O3SC6H4CO2H)2, (II), a structural isomer of (I). The copper ions in (II) are also centrosymmetric and Jahn–Teller distorted with four close [Cu—O distances of 1.941 (3) and 1.953 (3) Å] and two more distant [Cu—O = 2.515 (3) Å] water molecules in an otherwise very regular octahedral geometry (Fig. 2 ▸). As in (I), the carboxylate group is protonated and does not have any direct metal–oxygen interactions. The lack of metal–sulfonate bonding is more typical of the behavior of other 3d-block divalent transition metals (Leonard et al., 1999 ▸).
Figure 1
The molecular structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level and hydrogen atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Symmetry-equivalent water molecules and the sulfonate O4 atom are included to show the complete coordination environment of the cation. The longer Jahn–Teller distorted Cu1—O4 distances are shown as hollow bonds. [Symmetry code: (#) 1 − x, 1 − y, −z.]
Figure 2
The molecular structure of (II), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level and hydrogen atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Only one of the disordered orientations of the arene ring (atoms C2A—C6A at 50% occupancy) is shown. Symmetry-equivalent water molecules are included to show the complete coordination environment of the cation. The longer Jahn–Teller-distorted Cu1—O8 distances are shown as hollow bonds. [Symmetry code: (#) 1 − x, 2 − y, −z.]
The reaction of silver nitrate and potassium 4-sulfobenzoic acid yielded two silver-containing crystalline products reported here. Colorless needle-shaped crystals were identified as Ag0.69K0.31(O3SC6H4CO2H), (III), an anhydrous mixed silver/potassium salt of 4-sulfobenzoic acid. The asymmetric unit (Fig. 3 ▸) contains two independent cation sites, both on twofold symmetry special positions of the space group C2/c. One site (Ag1) was judged to be fully occupied by Ag+ cations, while the other site consists of split positions ca 0.2 Å apart. This site was modeled as two positions (Ag2 and K2) with partial occupancies fixed at 38% and 62%, respectively. The overall composition of the data crystal is 69% Ag and 31% K, which was corroborated by energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Ag1 is coordinated by six sulfonate O atoms at distances ranging from 2.4919 (11) to 2.5061 (10) Å in a moderately distorted octahedral geometry. Ag2 and K2 are also in a distorted octahedral environment formed from four sulfonate and two carboxylate O atoms at distances of 2.470 (3)–2.751 (3) Å (Ag2) and 2.584 (6)–2.653 (2) Å (K2). The Ag—O distances are consistent with those seen in other silverarenesulfonates (Côté & Shimizu, 2004 ▸), while the K—O distances are slightly shorter than those seen in three polymorphs of potassium 4-sulfobenzoic acid (Kariuki & Jones, 1995 ▸), which are mostly between ca 2.65 and 2.95 Å. The extensive metal–sulfonate bonding is as expected given the softer nature of Ag+ and K+ relative to divalent 3d transition metal ions (Parr & Pearson, 1983 ▸). As in (I) and (II), the carboxylate group remains protonated with the acidic H atom unambiguously located on O1.
Figure 3
The molecular structure of (III), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level and hydrogen atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Symmetry-equivalent oxygen atoms are included to show the complete coordination environments of the cations. Atoms Ag2 and K2 are present at 38% and 62% occupancies. The K2—O interactions are shown as hollow bonds for clarity. [Symmetry codes: ($) 1 − x, y, − z; (&&) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (@) 1 − x, 1 − y, 2 − z; (#) x, 1 − y, z − ; (&) x, 1 − y, z + ; (@@) 1 − x, 1 − y, 2 − z; ($$) x + , y + , z; (##) − x, y + , − z.]
The second product of the silver reaction crystallizes as colorless hexagonal plates determined to be Ag0.20K0.80(O3SC6H4CO2H)·2H2O, (IV). This compound is isostructural with K(O3SC6H4CO2H)·2H2O, one of the polymorphs of the starting material potassium 4-sulfobenzoic acid whose structure has been reported (Gunderman & Squattrito, 1994 ▸; Kariuki & Jones, 1995 ▸). The unique cation site was modeled as disordered with Ag+ and K+ present at occupancies fixed at 20% and 80%, respectively. This composition is supported by EDX analysis of the data crystal. The cation is surrounded by eight O atoms, including three water molecules and five sulfonate O atoms (Fig. 4 ▸). Although Shannon (1976 ▸) assigns Ag+ a smaller radius than K+, they are within 15–20% of each other for coordination number 8 so occupancy of the same site seems reasonable. The K1/Ag1-Owater distances [2.6233 (12), 2.7045 (13) and 2.8017 (11) Å] are ca 0.09 Å shorter than those reported for the site fully occupied by K+, however, both determinations of the latter used room temperature data so the difference cannot be directly attributed to the smaller radius of the Ag+ ion. The tendency of potassium and silver to occupy the same or similar sites in the arene sulfonate/carboxylate structures observed in this study is not the rule. For example, in silver potassium 5-sulfosalicylic acid, the Ag+and K+ ions occupy separate sites in the structure with very different coordination environments and no indication of mixed-occupancy (Li et al., 2006 ▸).
Figure 4
The molecular structure of (IV), showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 70% probability level and hydrogen atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Symmetry-equivalent water molecules and sulfonate oxygen atoms are included to show the complete coordination environment of the cation. The minor disordered component of the sulfonate group (atoms O3B, O4B, and O5B) has been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: ($) x, − y, z − ; (&) 1 + x, y, z; (@) 1 + x, −y + , z + ; (#) 1 − x, y − , − z.]
Supramolecular features
The complexes in (I) pack so as to create distinct layers of copper ions in the ab plane that alternate with layers of 4-sulfobenzoic acid anions stacking in the c-axis direction (Fig. 5 ▸). This two-dimensional alternating inorganic–organic motif is typical of metal arenesulfonates reported by us (Gunderman et al., 1996 ▸; Leonard et al., 1999 ▸) and others (Cai, 2004 ▸). The carboxylate group remains protonated with the H atom clearly located on atom O1 and the CO2H moieties are situated within the organic layer with no direct interaction with the cations. An extensive network of strong, nearly linear O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) involving the carboxylic H atom, coordinated water molecules, unprotonated sulfonate and carboxylate O atoms, and a non-coordinated water molecule reinforce the packing. A portion of this network is shown in more detail in Fig. 6 ▸.
Figure 5
Packing diagram of (I) with the outline of the unit cell. View is onto the (010) plane. O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds connecting the layers of copper complexes are shown as dashed bonds. H atoms bonded to C atoms have been omitted. The longer Jahn–Teller-distorted Cu1—O4 distances are shown as hollow bonds. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 70% probability level.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)
D—H⋯A
D—H
H⋯A
D⋯A
D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O8i
0.78
1.94
2.6979 (12)
164
O6—H6B⋯O5ii
0.81 (1)
1.97 (1)
2.7738 (11)
172 (2)
O6—H6A⋯O8iii
0.81 (1)
1.88 (1)
2.6872 (11)
172 (2)
O7—H7A⋯O2iv
0.83 (1)
1.86 (1)
2.6845 (11)
171 (2)
O7—H7B⋯O3v
0.84 (1)
1.84 (1)
2.6672 (11)
169 (2)
O8—H8B⋯O7
0.82 (1)
2.17 (1)
2.9255 (11)
153 (2)
O8—H8A⋯O5ii
0.83 (1)
1.99 (1)
2.7984 (11)
165 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .
Figure 6
Partial packing diagram of (I) showing a portion of the hydrogen-bonding scheme involving coordinated water molecules O6 and O7, non-coordinated water molecule O8, and the carboxylic acid group. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed bonds. The longer Jahn–Teller-distorted Cu1—O4 distances are shown as hollow bonds. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 70% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (#) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (&) x − 1, y, z.]
The packing pattern in (II) is very similar to that in (I) with layers of hexaaquacopper(II) cations in the ab plane alternating with layers of 4-sulfobenzoic acid anions along the c-axis direction (Fig. 7 ▸). The anions are positioned with the sulfonate groups on the exterior of the layer and the carboxylic acid groups somewhat more to the interior. All of the oxygen-bound H atoms participate in strong approximately linear O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to the unprotonated sulfonate and carboxylate O atoms or in the case of the carboxylic H atom to a coordinated water O atom (Table 2 ▸).
Figure 7
Packing diagram of (II) with the outline of the unit cell. View is onto the (010) plane. Only one of the disordered orientations of the arene rings (at 50% occupancy) is shown. O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds connecting the layers of hexaaquacopper complexes and 4-sulfobenzoic acid anions are shown as dashed bonds. H atoms bonded to C atoms have been omitted. The longer Jahn–Teller-distorted Cu1—O8 distances are shown as hollow bonds. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 70% probability level.
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)
D—H⋯A
D—H
H⋯A
D⋯A
D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O8
0.86 (7)
1.83 (7)
2.677 (4)
170 (7)
O6—H61⋯O5i
0.84 (2)
1.89 (3)
2.717 (4)
169 (5)
O6—H62⋯O4ii
0.84 (2)
1.93 (3)
2.725 (5)
158 (5)
O7—H71⋯O4iii
0.83 (2)
1.99 (3)
2.784 (5)
160 (5)
O7—H72⋯O2
0.83 (2)
1.84 (3)
2.645 (4)
161 (5)
O8—H81⋯O3iv
0.85 (2)
2.02 (3)
2.851 (5)
167 (5)
O8—H82⋯O5v
0.84 (2)
2.02 (3)
2.854 (5)
175 (5)
Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .
Given the highly acidic conditions of the reaction, it is not surprising that the less acidic carboxylate proton is present in both products, effectively preventing the carboxylate group from bonding directly to the copper ions. This outcome is undesirable from the standpoint of using the difunctional anion as a building block to make more extended metal–organic frameworks. Studies by other workers have shown that the use of hydrothermal conditions at higher pH can be an effective route to novel structures of aromatic sulfonate/carboxylate anions with coordination by both groups (Sun et al., 2004 ▸). Other studies have successfully produced the desired framework structures without the need for hydrothermal methods (Kurc et al., 2012 ▸).The packing in (III) features layers of metal ions in the bc plane alternating with layers of 4-sulfobenzoic acid anions stacking along the a-axis direction (Fig. 8 ▸). Anions in adjacent layers are linked in part by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between neighboring carboxylic acid groups in the classic dimerization of such molecules (Table 3 ▸). Since both functional groups are involved in metal bonding, the anions are positioned with both groups equally exterior with respect to the layer, in contrast to the slipped arrangement in (I) and (II).
Figure 8
Packing diagram of (III) with the outline of the unit cell. View is onto the (001) plane. The layers of 4-sulfobenzoic acid anions are evident with the silver and potassium ions situated in between the layers. O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds connecting the carboxylic H atoms and carboxylate O atoms of adjacent layers are shown as dashed bonds. H atoms bonded to C atoms have been omitted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 70% probability level.
Table 3
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (III)
D—H⋯A
D—H
H⋯A
D⋯A
D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i
0.75
1.94
2.6841 (16)
172
Symmetry code: (i) .
As in the other structures reported here, the carboxylic acid in (IV) is protonated and as in (I) and (II), it is in a more interior position in the anion layer than is the sulfonate group (Fig. 9 ▸). Once again, all of the oxygen-bound H atoms participate in a robust O—H⋯O network of hydrogen bonds detailed in Table 4 ▸.
Figure 9
Packing diagram of (IV) with the outline of the unit cell. View is onto the (010) plane. The layers of 4-sulfobenzoic acid anions are in the center of the cell with the silver and potassium ions (disordered over the same site) situated in between the layers. O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the carboxylic groups and coordinated water molecules are shown as dashed bonds. H atoms bonded to C atoms have been omitted. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 70% probability level.
Table 4
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (IV)
D—H⋯A
D—H
H⋯A
D⋯A
D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O6
0.79
1.85
2.6328 (14)
168
O6—H6A⋯O5Ai
0.85 (1)
2.01 (1)
2.840 (3)
168 (2)
O6—H6A⋯O5Bi
0.85 (1)
2.01 (2)
2.819 (12)
159 (2)
O6—H6B⋯O4Aii
0.84 (1)
1.99 (1)
2.824 (3)
176 (2)
O6—H6B⋯O4Bii
0.84 (1)
1.82 (2)
2.643 (12)
168 (2)
O7—H7A⋯O2
0.84 (1)
1.97 (1)
2.8111 (15)
177 (2)
O7—H7B⋯O3Aiii
0.84 (1)
2.03 (1)
2.838 (3)
162 (2)
O7—H7B⋯O3Biii
0.84 (1)
1.87 (2)
2.650 (12)
155 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .
Synthesis and crystallization
The reaction that produced (I) and (II) was commenced by dissolving 2.085 g (8.68 mmol) of potassium 4-sulfobenzoic acid (Aldrich, 98%) in 60 ml of water with gentle heating and stirring. To this solution was added 1.053 g (8.52 mmol) CuCO3 (Fisher), creating a thick green opaque mixture, followed by 50 drops of 12 M HCl. The solid gradually dissolved over ca 3 h leaving a clear light-blue solution that was then transferred to a porcelain evaporating dish and set out in a fume hood. Five days later, the water had completely evaporated, leaving behind large quantities of three types of crystals: large colorless to slightly yellow plates, light-blue needles, and small blue parallelepipeds. The colorless plates were identified to be potassium 4-sulfobenzoic acid dihydrate, the structure of which has been reported (Gunderman & Squattrito, 1994 ▸; Kariuki & Jones, 1995 ▸). The blue parallelepipeds are (I) and the blue needles are (II).A 2.012 g (8.37 mmol) sample of potassium 4-sulfobenzoic acid (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in 50 ml of water with gentle heat and stirring. To this colorless solution was added a colorless solution of 1.420 g (8.36 mmol) of AgNO3 (Baker) in 25 ml of water. The resulting slightly turbid opalescent mixture was transferred to a porcelain evaporating dish that was set out to evaporate in a fume hood. During the transfer, some white snowy particles were noted in the liquid. After several days, the water had completely evaporated leaving behind colorless crystals of two distinct morphologies, needles and hexagonal plates. The needles were identified as (III) and the plates as (IV) through the single crystal X-ray studies.
Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 5 ▸. For (I), hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon atoms and the carboxylic hydrogen atom were calculated on idealized positions and included in the refinement as riding atoms with C—H = 0.95 Å or O—H = 0.78 Å and their U
iso constrained to be 1.2 (C—H) or 1.5 (O—H) times the U
eq of the bonding atom. Hydrogen atoms bonded to water oxygen atoms were located in difference-Fourier maps and refined, followed by restraining the O—H distance to be 0.84 Å (DFIX) and constraining their U
iso to be 1.5 times the U
eq of the bonding atom. All crystals of (II) under investigation exhibited twinning and the structure was refined as a two-component twin with a 0.523 (2):0.477 (2) ratio. The twinning law was determined to be a 180° rotation around the triclinic b axis. Additionally, the arene rings are statistically disordered over two orientations such that atoms C2, C3, C5, and C6 are split between two positions (designated A and B) each assigned 50% occupancy. These atoms were refined with isotropic displacement parameters. All other non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters and full occupancies. The C—H hydrogen atoms were included as riding atoms with fixed distances of 0.93 Å. The O—H hydrogen atoms were located using difference-Fourier syntheses and were refined with their displacement parameters constrained to those of the bonding atoms (distances in Table 2 ▸). In (III), one of the two cation sites showed split positions separated by ca 0.2 Å. These were modeled as one containing Ag fixed at 38% occupancy and the other containing K fixed at 62% occupancy. With the other cation site modeled as 100% Ag, the overall composition of the data crystal based on the refinement is Ag0.69K0.31(O3SC6H4CO2H). Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) of three locations on the data crystal yielded an average Ag/K atom ratio matching the refinement composition. Hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon atoms were calculated on idealized positions and included in the refinement as riding atoms (C—H 0.95Å) with their U
iso constrained to be 1.2 times the U
eq of the bonding atom. The carboxylic hydrogen atom was placed on an idealized position with consideration given to the maximum of the electron density. It was then refined as a rotating group (around C7—O1) and U
iso was fixed to 1.5 times the U
eq of the bonding atom O1. In (IV), the unique cation site was modeled with a fixed 80% K/20% Ag occupancy constraining fractional coordinates and atomic displacement parameters to be the same for Ag and K. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) of three locations on the data crystal yielded an average K/Ag atom ratio in reasonable agreement with this 4:1 ratio. In addition, the sulfonate group displayed disorder with two sets of O atom positions (designated A and B) separated by an approximate 12° rotation about the C—S bond. The occupancies were assigned as 80% A and 20% B, with the A atoms being refined anisotropically and the B atoms isotropically. All other non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon atoms were calculated on idealized positions and included in the refinement as riding atoms (C—H = 0.95Å) with their U
iso constrained to be 1.2 times the U
eq of the bonding atom. The carboxyl hydrogen atom was placed on an idealized position with consideration given to the maximum of the electron density. It was then refined as a rotating group (around C7—O1) and U
iso was fixed to 1.5 times the U
eq of the bonding atom O1. Water hydrogen atoms were located in difference-Fourier maps and refined, followed by restraining the O—H distance to be 0.84 Å (DFIX) and constraining their U
iso to be 1.5 times the U
eq of the bonding atom.
Table 5
Experimental details
(I)
(II)
(III)
(IV)
Crystal data
Chemical formula
[Cu(C7H5O5S)2(H2O)4]·2H2O
[Cu(H2O)6](C7H5O5S)2
[Ag0.69K0.31](C7H5O5S)
[Ag0.20K0.80](C7H5O5S)·2H2O
Mr
573.97
573.97
287.72
290.06
Crystal system, space group
Triclinic, P
Triclinic, P
Monoclinic, C2/c
Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)
130
130
120
120
a, b, c (Å)
6.1907 (1), 7.2010 (2), 12.4919 (3)
6.4380 (13), 7.2431 (14), 12.088 (2)
19.436 (3), 15.644 (3), 5.3355 (9)
12.8018 (7), 9.9170 (6), 8.4013 (5)
α, β, γ (°)
90.310 (1), 94.587 (1), 111.087 (1)
72.60 (3), 77.20 (3), 82.13 (3)
90, 95.651 (2), 90
90, 94.747 (1), 90
V (Å3)
517.57 (2)
523.0 (2)
1614.4 (5)
1062.93 (11)
Z
1
1
8
4
Radiation type
Mo Kα
Mo Kα
Mo Kα
Mo Kα
μ (mm−1)
1.34
1.33
2.18
0.99
Crystal size (mm)
0.14 × 0.12 × 0.06
0.21 × 0.08 × 0.02
0.16 × 0.06 × 0.03
0.23 × 0.17 × 0.07
Data collection
Diffractometer
Bruker APEXII CCD
Bruker APEXII CCD
Bruker APEXII CCD
Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction
Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015 ▸)
Multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▸)
Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015 ▸)
Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015 ▸)
Tmin, Tmax
0.685, 0.747
0.585, 0.747
0.572, 0.648
0.666, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
13360, 3630, 3460
3738, 3738, 3370
12751, 2435, 2223
16575, 3255, 2831
Rint
0.011
0.045
0.020
0.023
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)
0.767
0.766
0.712
0.716
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S
0.020, 0.057, 1.14
0.059, 0.139, 1.18
0.017, 0.043, 1.08
0.025, 0.063, 1.08
No. of reflections
3630
3738
2435
3255
No. of parameters
171
169
135
171
No. of restraints
6
18
0
4
H-atom treatment
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)
0.51, −0.43
0.84, −1.19
0.51, −0.36
0.44, −0.54
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015 ▸), SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a
▸), SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015b
▸), CrystalMaker (Palmer, 2014 ▸) and CELL_NOW 2008/4 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸).
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, II, III, IV, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019014610/mw2148sup1.cifStructure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019014610/mw2148Isup2.hklStructure factors: contains datablock(s) II. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019014610/mw2148IIsup3.hklStructure factors: contains datablock(s) III. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019014610/mw2148IIIsup4.hklStructure factors: contains datablock(s) IV. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019014610/mw2148IVsup5.hklCCDC references: 1961811, 1961810, 1961809, 1961808, 1961811, 1961810, 1961809, 1961808Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu(C7H5O5S)2(H2O)4]·2H2O
Z = 1
Mr = 573.97
F(000) = 295
Triclinic, P1
Dx = 1.841 Mg m−3
a = 6.1907 (1) Å
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.2010 (2) Å
Cell parameters from 9988 reflections
c = 12.4919 (3) Å
θ = 3.0–32.9°
α = 90.310 (1)°
µ = 1.34 mm−1
β = 94.587 (1)°
T = 130 K
γ = 111.087 (1)°
Parallelpiped, light blue
V = 517.57 (2) Å3
0.14 × 0.12 × 0.06 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer
3460 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tube
Rint = 0.011
φ and ω scans
θmax = 33.0°, θmin = 1.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.685, Tmax = 0.747
k = −10→10
13360 measured reflections
l = −18→18
3630 independent reflections
Refinement on F2
Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.020
Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.057
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.14
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0245P)2 + 0.273P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3630 reflections
(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
171 parameters
Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3
6 restraints
Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken
into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059
Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.139
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.18
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0332P)2 + 2.049P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3738 reflections
(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
169 parameters
Δρmax = 0.84 e Å−3
18 restraints
Δρmin = −1.19 e Å−3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken
into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin. BASF refines to: 0.47690
x
y
z
Uiso*/Ueq
Occ. (<1)
Cu1
0.5000
1.0000
0.0000
0.00922 (14)
S1
0.89992 (13)
0.53760 (18)
0.82865 (7)
0.01095 (17)
O5
1.0191 (5)
0.3517 (5)
0.8217 (3)
0.0173 (6)
O4
0.7159 (4)
0.5122 (5)
0.92630 (19)
0.0115 (4)
O3
1.0340 (5)
0.6825 (4)
0.8291 (3)
0.0162 (7)
O2
0.6930 (5)
0.9432 (6)
0.2844 (3)
0.0241 (7)
O1
0.3772 (5)
0.8181 (7)
0.3778 (3)
0.0256 (7)
H1
0.333 (10)
0.874 (12)
0.313 (6)
0.038*
O6
0.6358 (5)
0.7475 (5)
0.0720 (3)
0.0135 (6)
H61
0.744 (6)
0.733 (8)
0.102 (4)
0.020*
H62
0.639 (8)
0.656 (6)
0.042 (5)
0.020*
O7
0.6741 (5)
1.1291 (5)
0.0619 (3)
0.0145 (6)
H71
0.700 (9)
1.245 (4)
0.035 (4)
0.022*
H72
0.706 (9)
1.082 (7)
0.128 (3)
0.022*
O8
0.2112 (4)
0.9557 (5)
0.1819 (2)
0.0128 (5)
H81
0.124 (7)
1.056 (5)
0.175 (5)
0.019*
H82
0.143 (8)
0.863 (6)
0.186 (5)
0.019*
C4
0.7954 (6)
0.6287 (8)
0.6968 (3)
0.0168 (8)
C3A
0.6064 (13)
0.5844 (14)
0.6900 (7)
0.0106 (13)*
0.5
H3A
0.5218
0.5095
0.7567
0.013*
0.5
C2A
0.5338 (14)
0.6495 (14)
0.5834 (7)
0.0134 (15)*
0.5
H2A
0.4059
0.6102
0.5777
0.016*
0.5
C3B
0.5727 (13)
0.6505 (16)
0.7017 (7)
0.0158 (14)*
0.5
H3B
0.4774
0.6196
0.7735
0.019*
0.5
C2B
0.5006 (14)
0.7198 (15)
0.5951 (7)
0.0173 (16)*
0.5
H2B
0.3551
0.7325
0.5947
0.021*
0.5
C1
0.6503 (6)
0.7712 (6)
0.4869 (3)
0.0155 (8)
C6A
0.8529 (12)
0.8324 (15)
0.4945 (6)
0.0144 (13)*
0.5
H6A
0.9325
0.9140
0.4288
0.017*
0.5
C5A
0.9247 (12)
0.7684 (15)
0.5998 (6)
0.0156 (13)*
0.5
H5A
1.0479
0.8108
0.6093
0.019*
0.5
C6B
0.8561 (12)
0.7127 (16)
0.4865 (7)
0.0174 (13)*
0.5
H6B
0.9507
0.7289
0.4146
0.021*
0.5
C5B
0.9332 (13)
0.6284 (14)
0.5903 (7)
0.0183 (15)*
0.5
H5B
1.0727
0.5734
0.5887
0.022*
0.5
C7
0.5754 (7)
0.8560 (6)
0.3725 (4)
0.0155 (8)
U11
U22
U33
U12
U13
U23
Cu1
0.0126 (3)
0.0084 (3)
0.0077 (2)
−0.0002 (3)
−0.00533 (19)
−0.0016 (3)
S1
0.0104 (4)
0.0135 (4)
0.0097 (3)
0.0005 (4)
−0.0037 (3)
−0.0037 (4)
O5
0.0155 (14)
0.0217 (17)
0.0183 (14)
0.0048 (12)
−0.0086 (11)
−0.0099 (12)
O4
0.0124 (11)
0.0130 (13)
0.0080 (9)
−0.0008 (13)
−0.0021 (8)
−0.0013 (12)
O3
0.0147 (14)
0.0132 (17)
0.0231 (15)
−0.0041 (11)
−0.0030 (11)
−0.0078 (11)
O2
0.0245 (15)
0.0318 (19)
0.0118 (12)
−0.0011 (15)
−0.0060 (11)
0.0017 (14)
O1
0.0266 (15)
0.037 (2)
0.0147 (12)
−0.0015 (18)
−0.0124 (11)
−0.0029 (17)
O6
0.0178 (14)
0.0099 (14)
0.0148 (13)
0.0014 (11)
−0.0073 (11)
−0.0045 (11)
O7
0.0203 (15)
0.0140 (15)
0.0115 (12)
−0.0077 (11)
−0.0087 (11)
−0.0001 (11)
O8
0.0123 (11)
0.0131 (14)
0.0144 (10)
−0.0003 (12)
−0.0044 (9)
−0.0048 (12)
C4
0.0129 (15)
0.029 (2)
0.0088 (13)
0.0015 (18)
−0.0038 (11)
−0.0056 (18)
C1
0.0185 (18)
0.019 (2)
0.0090 (14)
0.0053 (14)
−0.0045 (12)
−0.0051 (13)
C7
0.026 (2)
0.0118 (17)
0.0115 (15)
0.0016 (14)
−0.0075 (14)
−0.0058 (13)
Cu1—O7
1.941 (3)
C4—C5B
1.393 (9)
Cu1—O7i
1.941 (3)
C4—C3B
1.411 (9)
Cu1—O6i
1.953 (3)
C4—C5A
1.476 (9)
Cu1—O6
1.953 (3)
C3A—C2A
1.395 (11)
Cu1—O8
2.515 (3)
C3A—H3A
0.9300
Cu1—O8i
2.515 (3)
C2A—C1
1.370 (9)
S1—O3
1.449 (3)
C2A—H2A
0.9300
S1—O4
1.463 (2)
C3B—C2B
1.394 (11)
S1—O5
1.472 (4)
C3B—H3B
0.9300
S1—C4
1.776 (4)
C2B—C1
1.424 (9)
O2—C7
1.216 (5)
C2B—H2B
0.9300
O1—C7
1.325 (6)
C1—C6B
1.334 (9)
O1—H1
0.86 (7)
C1—C6A
1.464 (9)
O6—H61
0.84 (2)
C1—C7
1.493 (5)
O6—H62
0.84 (2)
C6A—C5A
1.377 (10)
O7—H71
0.83 (2)
C6A—H6A
0.9300
O7—H72
0.83 (2)
C5A—H5A
0.9300
O8—H81
0.85 (2)
C6B—C5B
1.388 (11)
O8—H82
0.84 (2)
C6B—H6B
0.9300
C4—C3A
1.326 (9)
C5B—H5B
0.9300
O7—Cu1—O7i
180.0
C4—C3A—H3A
119.8
O7—Cu1—O6i
89.23 (12)
C2A—C3A—H3A
119.8
O7i—Cu1—O6i
90.77 (12)
C1—C2A—C3A
120.3 (7)
O7—Cu1—O6
90.77 (12)
C1—C2A—H2A
119.9
O7i—Cu1—O6
89.23 (12)
C3A—C2A—H2A
119.9
O6i—Cu1—O6
180.0
C2B—C3B—C4
117.6 (7)
O7—Cu1—O8
92.88 (12)
C2B—C3B—H3B
121.2
O7i—Cu1—O8
87.12 (12)
C4—C3B—H3B
121.2
O8—Cu1—O8i
180.0
C3B—C2B—C1
119.8 (7)
O6—Cu1—O8
89.03 (12)
C3B—C2B—H2B
120.1
O6—Cu1—O8i
90.97 (12)
C1—C2B—H2B
120.1
O3—S1—O4
112.4 (2)
C6B—C1—C2B
118.9 (6)
O3—S1—O5
113.31 (17)
C2A—C1—C6A
120.3 (5)
O4—S1—O5
112.1 (2)
C6B—C1—C7
119.6 (5)
O3—S1—C4
106.3 (2)
C2A—C1—C7
123.0 (5)
O4—S1—C4
106.37 (16)
C2B—C1—C7
120.5 (5)
O5—S1—C4
105.8 (2)
C6A—C1—C7
116.6 (4)
C7—O1—H1
112 (4)
C5A—C6A—C1
119.5 (7)
Cu1—O6—H61
124 (4)
C5A—C6A—H6A
120.2
Cu1—O6—H62
119 (4)
C1—C6A—H6A
120.2
H61—O6—H62
108 (4)
C6A—C5A—C4
116.4 (7)
Cu1—O7—H71
125 (4)
C6A—C5A—H5A
121.8
Cu1—O7—H72
123 (3)
C4—C5A—H5A
121.8
H71—O7—H72
111 (4)
C1—C6B—C5B
122.0 (7)
H81—O8—H82
107 (3)
C1—C6B—H6B
119.0
C5B—C4—C3B
119.5 (5)
C5B—C6B—H6B
119.0
C3A—C4—C5A
122.7 (5)
C6B—C5B—C4
118.0 (7)
C3A—C4—S1
121.7 (4)
C6B—C5B—H5B
121.0
C5B—C4—S1
118.0 (4)
C4—C5B—H5B
121.0
C3B—C4—S1
120.3 (4)
O2—C7—O1
125.5 (4)
C5A—C4—S1
115.4 (4)
O2—C7—C1
121.3 (4)
C4—C3A—C2A
120.3 (7)
O1—C7—C1
113.1 (4)
D—H···A
D—H
H···A
D···A
D—H···A
O1—H1···O8
0.86 (7)
1.83 (7)
2.677 (4)
170 (7)
O6—H61···O5ii
0.84 (2)
1.89 (3)
2.717 (4)
169 (5)
O6—H62···O4iii
0.84 (2)
1.93 (3)
2.725 (5)
158 (5)
O7—H71···O4iv
0.83 (2)
1.99 (3)
2.784 (5)
160 (5)
O7—H72···O2
0.83 (2)
1.84 (3)
2.645 (4)
161 (5)
O8—H81···O3v
0.85 (2)
2.02 (3)
2.851 (5)
167 (5)
O8—H82···O5vi
0.84 (2)
2.02 (3)
2.854 (5)
175 (5)
[Ag0.69K0.31](C7H5O5S)
F(000) = 1130.6
Mr = 287.72
Dx = 2.368 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/c
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 19.436 (3) Å
Cell parameters from 7014 reflections
b = 15.644 (3) Å
θ = 2.6–30.4°
c = 5.3355 (9) Å
µ = 2.17 mm−1
β = 95.651 (2)°
T = 120 K
V = 1614.4 (5) Å3
Needle, colorless
Z = 8
0.16 × 0.06 × 0.03 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer
2435 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube
2223 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Curved graphite crystal monochromator
Rint = 0.020
ω scans
θmax = 30.4°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = −27→27
Tmin = 0.572, Tmax = 0.648
k = −22→22
12751 measured reflections
l = −7→7
Refinement on F2
Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.017
Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.043
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.021P)2 + 1.6847P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2435 reflections
(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
135 parameters
Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3
0 restraints
Δρmin = −0.36 e Å−3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken
into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
x
y
z
Uiso*/Ueq
Occ. (<1)
Ag1
0.500000
0.54234 (2)
0.750000
0.01208 (5)
Ag2
0.500000
0.2558 (3)
0.250000
0.0138 (5)
0.38
K2
0.500000
0.2420 (5)
0.250000
0.0119 (6)
0.62
S1
0.39857 (2)
0.35832 (2)
0.72451 (6)
0.00889 (7)
O1
0.08310 (6)
0.41836 (8)
0.1298 (2)
0.0193 (2)
H1
0.0452 (12)
0.4128 (14)
0.0891 (18)
0.029*
O2
0.05037 (5)
0.38234 (8)
0.5066 (2)
0.0210 (2)
O3
0.43544 (5)
0.35558 (7)
0.4987 (2)
0.0145 (2)
O4
0.41399 (5)
0.43608 (7)
0.8736 (2)
0.0130 (2)
O5
0.40550 (5)
0.28066 (7)
0.8741 (2)
0.0155 (2)
C1
0.17074 (7)
0.38502 (9)
0.4510 (3)
0.0130 (3)
C2
0.22060 (7)
0.41777 (9)
0.3068 (3)
0.0140 (3)
H2
0.206693
0.445860
0.152193
0.017*
C3
0.29056 (7)
0.40970 (9)
0.3872 (3)
0.0127 (3)
H3
0.324600
0.432562
0.289897
0.015*
C4
0.30975 (7)
0.36746 (9)
0.6130 (3)
0.0100 (2)
C5
0.26050 (7)
0.33392 (10)
0.7577 (3)
0.0136 (3)
H5
0.274541
0.304689
0.910281
0.016*
C6
0.19057 (7)
0.34337 (10)
0.6781 (3)
0.0154 (3)
H6
0.156577
0.321642
0.777569
0.018*
C7
0.09604 (7)
0.39454 (10)
0.3672 (3)
0.0159 (3)
U11
U22
U33
U12
U13
U23
Ag1
0.01209 (7)
0.01398 (8)
0.01001 (7)
0.000
0.00026 (5)
0.000
Ag2
0.0148 (4)
0.0146 (12)
0.0123 (4)
0.000
0.0023 (3)
0.000
K2
0.0102 (6)
0.014 (2)
0.0113 (6)
0.000
0.0009 (4)
0.000
S1
0.00656 (13)
0.01002 (15)
0.01008 (15)
−0.00029 (10)
0.00077 (11)
−0.00019 (11)
O1
0.0113 (5)
0.0227 (6)
0.0223 (6)
−0.0008 (4)
−0.0068 (4)
0.0043 (4)
O2
0.0095 (5)
0.0330 (6)
0.0199 (5)
0.0031 (4)
−0.0021 (4)
−0.0051 (5)
O3
0.0110 (5)
0.0195 (5)
0.0140 (5)
0.0004 (4)
0.0053 (4)
−0.0017 (4)
O4
0.0104 (4)
0.0130 (5)
0.0150 (5)
−0.0009 (4)
−0.0016 (4)
−0.0036 (4)
O5
0.0119 (5)
0.0137 (5)
0.0204 (5)
0.0003 (4)
−0.0006 (4)
0.0056 (4)
C1
0.0093 (6)
0.0142 (6)
0.0148 (6)
0.0005 (5)
−0.0029 (5)
−0.0039 (5)
C2
0.0132 (6)
0.0141 (6)
0.0139 (6)
−0.0001 (5)
−0.0028 (5)
0.0011 (5)
C3
0.0118 (6)
0.0136 (6)
0.0125 (6)
−0.0018 (5)
0.0004 (5)
0.0011 (5)
C4
0.0077 (5)
0.0107 (6)
0.0113 (6)
−0.0002 (4)
−0.0003 (5)
−0.0019 (5)
C5
0.0091 (6)
0.0192 (7)
0.0125 (6)
−0.0004 (5)
0.0005 (5)
0.0025 (5)
C6
0.0088 (6)
0.0228 (7)
0.0146 (6)
−0.0018 (5)
0.0009 (5)
0.0004 (5)
C7
0.0115 (6)
0.0151 (7)
0.0200 (7)
0.0015 (5)
−0.0047 (5)
−0.0036 (5)
Ag1—O4
2.4919 (11)
S1—O5
1.4525 (11)
Ag1—O4i
2.4920 (11)
S1—O3
1.4616 (11)
Ag1—O3ii
2.4928 (11)
S1—O4
1.4682 (11)
Ag1—O3iii
2.4928 (11)
S1—C4
1.7756 (14)
Ag1—O4iv
2.5061 (10)
O1—C7
1.3205 (19)
Ag1—O4v
2.5061 (10)
O1—H1
0.75 (2)
Ag1—Ag1iii
2.9785 (4)
O2—C7
1.2282 (19)
Ag1—Ag1iv
2.9785 (4)
C1—C2
1.393 (2)
Ag1—Ag2iii
3.158 (5)
C1—C6
1.396 (2)
Ag1—K2iii
3.373 (8)
C1—C7
1.4840 (19)
Ag2—O3vi
2.470 (3)
C2—C3
1.3906 (19)
Ag2—O3
2.470 (3)
C2—H2
0.9500
K2—O2vii
2.584 (6)
C3—C4
1.3925 (19)
K2—O2viii
2.584 (6)
C3—H3
0.9500
K2—O3vi
2.611 (6)
C4—C5
1.3904 (19)
K2—O3
2.612 (6)
C5—C6
1.3913 (19)
K2—O5i
2.653 (2)
C5—H5
0.9500
K2—O5ix
2.653 (2)
C6—H6
0.9500
O4—Ag1—O4i
96.32 (5)
O3—S1—C4
105.40 (7)
O4—Ag1—O3ii
84.29 (4)
O4—S1—C4
104.75 (6)
O4i—Ag1—O3ii
162.59 (4)
C7—O1—H1
109.5
O4—Ag1—O3iii
162.59 (4)
C7—O2—K2viii
138.90 (15)
O4i—Ag1—O3iii
84.29 (4)
S1—O3—Ag2
141.04 (10)
O3ii—Ag1—O3iii
100.33 (5)
S1—O3—Ag1iii
137.17 (6)
O4—Ag1—O4iv
106.84 (3)
Ag2—O3—Ag1iii
79.04 (9)
O4i—Ag1—O4iv
83.68 (4)
S1—O3—K2
137.55 (14)
O3ii—Ag1—O4iv
79.52 (4)
Ag1iii—O3—K2
82.70 (13)
O3iii—Ag1—O4iv
90.53 (4)
S1—O4—Ag1
121.05 (6)
O4—Ag1—O4v
83.68 (4)
S1—O4—Ag1iv
129.07 (6)
O4i—Ag1—O4v
106.84 (3)
Ag1—O4—Ag1iv
73.16 (3)
O3ii—Ag1—O4v
90.53 (4)
S1—O5—K2x
128.74 (17)
O3iii—Ag1—O4v
79.52 (4)
C2—C1—C6
120.23 (13)
O4iv—Ag1—O4v
164.51 (5)
C2—C1—C7
120.64 (13)
O3vi—Ag2—O3
101.60 (17)
C6—C1—C7
119.14 (13)
O2vii—K2—O2viii
82.3 (2)
C3—C2—C1
120.56 (13)
O2vii—K2—O3vi
91.83 (4)
C3—C2—H2
119.7
O2viii—K2—O3vi
172.8 (2)
C1—C2—H2
119.7
O2vii—K2—O3
172.8 (2)
C2—C3—C4
118.71 (13)
O2viii—K2—O3
91.84 (4)
C2—C3—H3
120.6
O3vi—K2—O3
94.3 (3)
C4—C3—H3
120.6
O2vii—K2—O5i
106.44 (13)
C5—C4—C3
121.28 (13)
O2viii—K2—O5i
93.44 (10)
C5—C4—S1
118.90 (11)
O3vi—K2—O5i
84.13 (15)
C3—C4—S1
119.80 (10)
O3—K2—O5i
78.01 (13)
C4—C5—C6
119.71 (13)
O2vii—K2—O5ix
93.44 (10)
C4—C5—H5
120.1
O2viii—K2—O5ix
106.44 (13)
C6—C5—H5
120.1
O3vi—K2—O5ix
78.01 (13)
C5—C6—C1
119.50 (13)
O3—K2—O5ix
84.13 (15)
C5—C6—H6
120.3
O5i—K2—O5ix
153.7 (3)
C1—C6—H6
120.3
O5—S1—O3
113.70 (6)
O2—C7—O1
122.99 (13)
O5—S1—O4
113.11 (7)
O2—C7—C1
123.07 (14)
O3—S1—O4
112.35 (6)
O1—C7—C1
113.94 (13)
O5—S1—C4
106.62 (6)
D—H···A
D—H
H···A
D···A
D—H···A
O1—H1···O2xi
0.75
1.94
2.6841 (16)
172
[Ag0.20K0.80](C7H5O5S)·2H2O
F(000) = 590.4
Mr = 290.06
Dx = 1.813 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/c
Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 12.8018 (7) Å
Cell parameters from 8713 reflections
b = 9.9170 (6) Å
θ = 2.6–30.6°
c = 8.4013 (5) Å
µ = 0.99 mm−1
β = 94.747 (1)°
T = 120 K
V = 1062.93 (11) Å3
Plate, colorless
Z = 4
0.23 × 0.17 × 0.07 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer
3255 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube
2831 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Curved graphite crystal monochromator
Rint = 0.023
ω scans
θmax = 30.6°, θmin = 1.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = −18→18
Tmin = 0.666, Tmax = 0.746
k = −14→14
16575 measured reflections
l = −12→12
Refinement on F2
Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025
Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.063
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08
w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0273P)2 + 0.5631P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3255 reflections
(Δ/σ)max = 0.003
171 parameters
Δρmax = 0.44 e Å−3
4 restraints
Δρmin = −0.54 e Å−3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken
into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Authors: Reuben T Bettinger; Philip J Squattrito; Darpandeep Aulakh; Christopher G Gianopoulos Journal: Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun Date: 2022-08-31