Literature DB >> 31708877

Non-genomic Effects of Estrogen on Cell Homeostasis and Remodeling With Special Focus on Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.

Rossella Puglisi1, Gianfranco Mattia1, Alessandra Carè1, Giuseppe Marano1, Walter Malorni1,2, Paola Matarrese1.   

Abstract

This review takes into consideration the main mechanisms involved in cellular remodeling following an ischemic injury, with special focus on the possible role played by non-genomic estrogen effects. Sex differences have also been considered. In fact, cardiac ischemic events induce damage to different cellular components of the heart, such as cardiomyocytes, vascular cells, endothelial cells, and cardiac fibroblasts. The ability of the cardiovascular system to counteract an ischemic insult is orchestrated by these cell types and is carried out thanks to a number of complex molecular pathways, including genomic (slow) or non-genomic (fast) effects of estrogen. These pathways are probably responsible for differences observed between the two sexes. Literature suggests that male and female hearts, and, more in general, cardiovascular system cells, show significant differences in many parameters under both physiological and pathological conditions. In particular, many experimental studies dealing with sex differences in the cardiovascular system suggest a higher ability of females to respond to environmental insults in comparison with males. For instance, as cells from females are more effective in counteracting the ischemia/reperfusion injury if compared with males, a role for estrogen in this sex disparity has been hypothesized. However, the possible involvement of estrogen-dependent non-genomic effects on the cardiovascular system is still under debate. Further experimental studies, including sex-specific studies, are needed in order to shed further light on this matter.
Copyright © 2019 Puglisi, Mattia, Carè, Marano, Malorni and Matarrese.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyocytes; estrogen; gender; ischemia/reperfusion; myocardial infarction; non-nuclear estrogen receptors; sex; vascular cells

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708877      PMCID: PMC6823206          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including acute myocardial infarction (MI), represent leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide in both sexes. However, in past years, the risk of CVD was underestimated in women due to the mistaken belief that women could somehow be protected (1, 2). Although it was observed that women develop coronary artery disease about 10 years later than men, they show a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors at the same times of their lifespan (3). Even currently CVD continue to be perceived as predominantly male pathologies, leaving women vulnerable to CVD due to an inadequate prevention. However, even if women in their reproductive age have a lower risk of cardiovascular events, their advantage decreases after menopause, so that CVD are the leading cause of death in women older than 65 years (4). In fact, in Europe, CVD cause a greater proportion of deaths among women than men (5, 6), also representing a critical economic burden (7). The mechanisms leading to MI are due to a blocked blood flow resulting in various biochemical and metabolic alterations within the myocardium, i.e., in its main cell components: the cardiomyocytes (CMs). These cells undergo a series of well-characterized alterations, including mitochondrial dysfunction and, if prolonged, the death of cardiomyocytes (CMs). Obviously, ischemic events also induce damage in vascular cells and cardiac fibroblasts (CFs). The ability of cardiac tissue to recover after these events is carried out through a complex process of remodeling, orchestrated by CFs, inflammatory cells and cardiomyocytes (8). A number of complex cellular and molecular pathways, including antioxidant pathways and hormones, have been demonstrated to be able to counteract the damage. Imbalance or failure of these pathways leads to adverse remodeling of the heart and poor prognosis. However, the precise mechanisms of cardiomyocytes molecular injury after MI are still to be elucidated in detail (9). Some of these determinants are of interest of this work and are listed here below. Following a MI, the left ventricle undergoes a remodeling that involves the removal of the necrotic tissue that is replaced by extracellular matrix proteins. The removal of necrotic tissue is carried out by the immune cells that polarize and release enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (10). It was observed that infiltrating leukocytes release cytokines and growth factors such as pro-inflammatory interleukin IL-1β and reparative transforming growth factor β (11) that contribute to microenvironment alteration. This inflammatory state has been shown to be different in males and females either in animal models or in humans. In particular, females have a more moderate response to inflammatory stimuli; for example, in sepsis and atherosclerosis they have lower pro-inflammatory leukocyte-mediated inflammation and a faster resolution of inflammation compared with males (12, 13). Although it is known that XX cells have a more pronounced antioxidant capability (14–17), this matter should be better investigated in post-ischemic MI-associated damage. It has been observed that early restoration of coronary blood flow after MI plays an important role in minimizing myocardial tissue injury through various types of therapy, such as thrombolytic therapy, coronary artery bypass grafting or primary percutaneous intervention (18). However, reperfusion may further contribute to newer myocardial damage defined as myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, in which oxidative stress plays a critical role igniting ROS generation eventually leading to necrotic, apoptotic or autophagic cell death (19). Accordingly, current anti-apoptotic agents have generally been reported to safeguard the heart from I/R injury (20–22). However, increasing evidence also indicates that modulation of autophagy, that can be considered as a cytoprotective mechanism that leads to cell death only once all the energy supply derived by intracellular materials are exhausted, is now considered as a novel therapeutic strategy in myocardial I/R injury (23). Although sex steroid hormones, particularly estrogens, appear to be involved through genomic and non-genomic effects in cell remodeling, molecular mechanisms remain still unknown (24, 25). Females undergo more efficient cardiac remodeling after ischemia/reperfusion injury most likely due to the cytoprotective effects of estrogen via an unknown mechanism. The regulatory effects of estrogen in cardiac sensitivity to I/R injury could have in fact many potential therapeutic implications, e.g., influencing strategies in acute coronary syndrome management. Tamargo and co-workers shed some light on this matter discussing in detail the efficacy and safety of several drugs of common use in cardiovascular diseases taking into account both sexes (6).

Estrogen and Estrogen Receptors

Several estrogens, including estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), and estriol (E3) are present in the adult bloodstream, where E2 is the most represented and exerts many effects in both physiological and pathological conditions including cancer (26). In addition to its production in the ovaries of fertile women, E2 can be produced in other tissues as a product of enzymatic conversion of testosterone by aromatase (27). This enzyme is expressed in different extragonadic tissues, such as fat, bone and brain (28). Furthermore, increasing lines of evidence also demonstrate the local production of aromatase by heart and blood vessels of both sexes (29, 30). E2 biological activities pass through its interaction with the estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ. Moreover, several polymorphisms that could be of relevance in CVD have been reported for these receptors (31–33). Initially identified into cytosol and nucleus, ERα and ERβ have more recently been described also at the level of the different intracellular compartments like endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi and mitochondria, other than plasma membrane (34, 35). Indeed, the different intracellular localization of these receptors impacts their specific signaling cascades and their ability to control cell growth, differentiation, survival or death (36–38). Besides ERα and β, an additional E2 binding responsive receptor, named G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) has been identified (39). GPER is a member of the family of 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and, besides plasma membrane, it has been localized in various intracellular organelles where it mediates several E2 effects (40).

Signaling Pathways of Estrogen Receptors in Brief

Estrogen receptors transmit hormonal signals through three different pathways. The first one, known as “classic” or genomic, regulates the expression of target genes by DNA binding at specific response elements (EREs). Upon E2 binding, ERs dissociate from the complex formed with some heat shock proteins (like HSP70 and HSP90) in the cytosol, change their conformation and migrate as homo- or hetero-dimers into the nucleus (41). The second signaling is controlled by an indirect ER binding to DNA, mediated by different co-factors (like SP-1, AP-1, and NF-κB) that exert their transcription regulation by physical interaction with DNA (42). Finally, in the non nuclear pathway, E2 induces very rapid cellular effects, acting through receptors localized at the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and mitochondria. Soon after binding E2, the membrane receptors interact with the Gα and Gβγ proteins to stimulate rapid signals (cAMP and cGMP) and trigger the activation of several transduction pathways (43, 44). The activation of kinases phosphorylates ER or other transcription factors resulting in gene expression regulation (45). As far as GPER is concerned, after E2 binding, it mediates a rapid membrane response involving the activation of kinases, ion channels and second messengers (46). In particular, in the endoplasmic reticulum, GPER activation induces calcium release and PI3K-Akt pathway activation, thus inducing cell proliferation (39, 40). Moreover, although still debated, it seems now clear that GPER does not physically associate with the mitochondria but, instead, its ability to regulate intracellular calcium levels indirectly affects mitochondrial function, including the so-called mitochondrial-induced cell death (47). Earliest studies on GPER also suggest how this receptor, although indirectly, regulates gene expression via an importin-dependent mechanism (48, 49). A schematic picture of possible estrogen action by genomic and plasma membrane ER/GPER signaling pathways is reported in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Schematic picture of estrogen action by genomic and plasma membrane ER/GPER signaling pathways.

Schematic picture of estrogen action by genomic and plasma membrane ER/GPER signaling pathways.

Expression of Estrogen Receptors in the Cardiac Tissue

First evidence of ERα and ERβ expression in the cardiac tissue comes from a study performed in both female and male rat cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts (50). Subsequently, both the ERs were described in the human heart tissue (51) Later, ERα was localized in the nucleus and in the sarcolemma and intercalated discs of human cardiomyocytes (52). Additional data obtained from female and male mice hearts showed that ERα was mainly localized to the sarcolemma whereas ERβ to the nucleus and cytosol of the ventricular and atrial cells (53). ERβ was also described in human cardiac mitochondria (54). More recently, isolated mouse cardiomyocytes showed the presence of all the three ERα isoforms (ERα66, ERα46, and ERα36) in the nucleus (55). However, conflicting evidence also exists as concerns ERβ expression and localization in cardiomyocytes. Of course, the use of antibodies of doubtful specificity (56) as well as the wide variability of animal models and samples analyzed (e.g., whole heart or isolated cardiomyocyte lysates) caused the production of mutually contradictory data. For example, the presence of ERβ in human cardiac mitochondria (54) is still debated (57) and some reports have documented the total absence of ERβ in isolated cardiomyocytes (55). More recently, in a study exclusively conducted at mRNA level in rat cardiovascular tissues, high expression levels of ERα were detected, followed by GPER in terms of abundance, whereas ERβ appeared as nearly undetectable (58). Finally, in line with these results, the implication of ERβ in heart functional recovery after treatment with specific agonists in different animal models of heart failure also appears as still unclear (59–61). As regards vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), ERα was found to localize to the nuclei and to the plasma membrane in combination with caveolin-1, whereas ERβ was predominantly nuclear (62, 63). Both estrogen receptors have been described also in human adult aortic VSMCs (64). In these cells ERα and ERβ appear as localized at the level of caveolae where a direct binding to striatin is essential for their membrane localization (65). Also GPER was detected in numerous cardiac compartments of the human heart (66) and in coronary artery VSMCs (67). During myocardial hypoxia due to infarction, GPER seems to be upregulated in cardiomyocytes (68). The question whether the beneficial actions offered by estrogen are due to ERα or to ERβ stimulated a large number of in vivo studies (69, 70). These studies were conducted in genetically modified mice and the use of selective agonists or antagonists of these receptors. However, which ER could play a major protective role against I/R injury is still under debate. In fact, a role either for ERα (71–74) or for ERβ (61, 75–77) has been hypothesized. This discrepancy could be due to different models of I/R and/or to different doses and timing of treatments taken into consideration.

Estrogen Receptors: Genetically Modified Mice

As mentioned above, experimental studies involving animal models contributed to delineate the mechanisms involved in sex-related differences in cardiac tolerance to ischemia. In particular, most information derives from the study of genetically modified animals (see Table 1). Unfortunately, several studies have been performed almost exclusively on male animals, without taking into account the differences in hormonal fluctuations between sexes (127). In particular, studies based on different ERα gene targeting in murine models have defined the role specifically played by this receptor with particular reference to the different functional domains that compose the protein. As a matter of fact both estrogen receptors are composed by six functionally distinct protein regions like a DNA binding domain (DBD), a ligand-binding domain (LBD), a central region containing a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) and two regions acting as transcriptional activators (AF1 and AF-2), respectively located at the carboxy- and amino-terminal ends (128). The protein region responsible for the activity of E2 in the vascular system and in the metabolic function was identified in the AF2 domain (96), while the AF1 domain seems to be mainly involved in the reproductive function (98). In the same way, it was demonstrated that the localization at the plasma membrane of the receptor was closely dependent on its palmitoylation, which in turn favors its association with caveolin-1 in the lipid rafts (99, 100). Indeed, any mutation blocking one of these events effectively abrogates the migration of the receptor to the cell membrane and the stimulation of the membrane specific signaling pathway (129). The importance of striatin in mediating ERs correct localization at plasma membrane was also demonstrated since disruption of ER-striatin interactions abrogated E2-mediated protection against vascular injury (101). More recently, the central role of estrogen-mediated plasma membrane signaling in EC proliferation and migration was further demonstrated by the generation of a mutant version of ERα (KRR ERα), specifically defective in this rapid signaling pathway (103).
Table 1

Roles played by estrogen receptors in cardiac function in response to hormonal stimuli: studies in genetically modified animals.

Mouse modelGenetic featureVascular phenotype and estrogen response
ERα-Neo-KOInsertion of neomycin resistance cassette into ESR1 exon 1 resulting in an ERα mutant form lacking the functional AF-1 (78).Protection of carotid arterial from injury (79). Preserved endothelial NO production (80). Heart functional recovery after I/R in ERαKO female hearts similar to that in WT (75). More severe cardiac damage following I/R injury in male mice (73). Cardiac growth unresponsive to E2 treatment (74).
ERα −/−Insertion of neomycin resistance cassette into ESR1 exon 2 resulting in complete deletion of ERα (81).Loss of re-endothelialization process (82). Inhibition of NO production in aorta (83). No protection in vascular injury (84). Reduced coronary capillary density associated to decreased VEGF expression and signaling (85).
ER1KOTargeted mutation of ERα (71)Decreased heart functional recovery in female ER1KO in comparison to female WT (71).
NERKI +/− or ERα−/A (KI)Mutated allele in DBD (E207A/G208A, or AA) introduced onto the ERα−/− background (86, 87).Not determined
ENERKIMutation in LBD domain of ERα (G525L) (88).Not determined
KIKOGenerated by crossing NERKI+/− with ERα +/− mouse model (89).Not determined
ERα(EAAE/EAAE) transgenic (KI)Mutation of four amino acid in the DNA recognition helix (Y201E, K210A, K214A, R215E) (90, 91).Not determined
H2NES ERα mutantInsertion of some point mutations in the NLS combined with a nuclear export signal (NES) in the D-domain (92, 93).Not determined
ERαAF-10Deletion of AF1 domain (amino acids 2-148) (94).Preserved endothelial NO production and re-endothelialization process and prevention of atheroma (94). Inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia protection in VSMC ERα AF-1 (95).
RαAF-20Deletion of AF2 domain (aa 543–549) (96).Preserved endothelial repair but failed atheroprotective action (96). Unresponsive to estrogens for beneficial arteriolar effects (97).
MOERExpression of the ERα E domain (LBD-AF2) containing multiple palmitoylation sites in an ERα−/− background (98).Not determined
NOER or C451A-ERαMutation of palmitoylation site of ERα.Absence of eNOS phosphorylation, vasorelaxation, acceleration of endothelial healing (99, 100). Fully responsive to prevent atheroma and Ang II–induced hypertension (97).
DPMOverexpression of the Disrupting Peptide Mouse (DPM) (aa 176–253) to inhibit ERα interaction with striatin (101).Inability to stimulate EC migration and to inhibit VSMC growth in vitro. Loss of protection against vascular injury in vivo (101).
(KRRki/ki)Mutated ERα (KRR) introduced onto the ERα−/− background under the control of the endogenous ERα promoter (102).Not determined (102). EC (KRR ERα) inability to proliferate and migrate (103).
csERα-OEConditioned cardiomyocyte-specific overexpressing ERα (csERα-OE).Increased LV mass, LV volume and cardiomyocytes length in both sexes. Attenuated fibrosis and increased angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in female ERα-OE after MI (104).
csERα−/−Cardiomyocyte-specific ERαKO (csERα−/−).Sex-differences in multiple structural parameters of the heart, with minimal functional differences. Identification of different gene networks potentially involved in cardiac biology (105).
ERβKOInsertion of neomycin resistance cassette into exon 3 of ESR2 (81, 106). Expression of several transcript variants lacking exon 3.Conserved inhibition of VSMC proliferation and increase in vascular medial area (106, 107). Vasoconstriction and VSMC abnormalities (106, 108). Defects in heart morphology and increased hypertension with aging (106, 109). More severe heart failure with increased mortality after MI in female KO mice (106, 110). Less heart functional recovery after I/R in ERβKO female hearts compared to WT (75, 106). Loss of inhibition of Ang II-induced hypertrophy (106, 111). Conserved accelerated re-endothelialization in female mice (81, 82). Absence of atherosclerosis protection (112).
ERβKODeletion of exon 3 by Cre/LoxP-mediated excision (113, 114). Residual deleted ERβ protein in the prostate tissue (114).No abnormalities of heart morphology, morphometry, and ultrastructure in 16-month-old males (113). No vascular phenotype determined (114). No cardioprotective effects of E2 on LV hypertrophy (115).
csERβ-OEConditioned cardiomyocyte-specific overexpressing ERβ (csERβ-OE).No differences in heart structure and function compared with WT mice. Improved survival and cardiac function in both sexes compared to the WT counterparts after MI. Attenuated cardiac fibrosis in males csERβ-OE mice (116).
GPER KO1-4Deletion of GPER30 open reading frame to generate KO1 (117) KO2 (118) and KO3 (119). Insertion of full-length lacZ transcript insertion, retaining the C-term portion of the protein in KO4 (120).Absence of beneficial effects on vascular tone and blood pressure (117, 121). Increased atherosclerosis progression (117, 122). Abrogated vasodilator response (117, 123).Increased blood pressure and vascular resistance with aging (118). Loss of cardioprotection against I/R injury in male mice (118, 124). Impaired LV cardiac function in male KO mice (119, 125). No evident blood pressure problems in younger mice (120).
csGPER-KOCardiomyocyte-specific GPER KO.Alterations of cardiac structure and functional impairment. LV dimension more affected in male KO mice compared to female ones. Differential gene expression profiles affecting multiple transcriptional sex-related networks (126).
Roles played by estrogen receptors in cardiac function in response to hormonal stimuli: studies in genetically modified animals. Furthermore, some mouse models have been created in order to dissect the different pathways triggered by the nuclear and the non-nuclear ER signaling. The MOER mouse model (98), expressing only the membrane domain (LDB-AF2 domain), showed a phenotype that was very similar to that of ERα−/−. However, these mice were still able to regulate some metabolic pathways in response to estrogen treatment (130). On the other hand, in murine models expressing only ERα nuclear mutant (e.g., NOER) the beneficial vascular effects of estrogen were lost (99). More recently, further studies on a different ERα knockout (KO) mouse model have allowed to better define the role played by the nuclear (ERαC451A) and non-nuclear (ERαAF2°) estrogen signaling in arterial protection (97). ERβ KO mouse models have also been proposed in order to better define the metabolic and vascular activity of ERβ receptors (81, 106). Although showing a less severe phenotype compared with ERα KO, these mice were characterized by abnormalities of heart morphology (109), increased severity of heart failure (HF) after MI as well as less functional recovery after I/R, especially in female mice (75, 110). However, other studies failed to reveal a specific protective role of ERβ in atherosclerosis (112) or in vascular injury (107). Since these two murine models displayed alternative splicing transcripts, additional KO models were also generated (113, 114). Indeed, in these mice the expression of a portion of ERβ in the prostate was observed, suggesting the presence of some still active minor transcripts (114). However, despite being sterile, these KO mice showed a correct development of the main organs and a normal homeostasis of the different body systems. In particular, Antal and coworkers reported the absence of heart abnormalities in 16-month-old male mice (113). As regards GPER KO, four different mouse models were generated. However, no evident phenotype changes in terms of viability or reproductive function were observed. Three of them (117–119) did not express GPER, whereas the fourth mouse model synthesized a lacZ reporter fused with the C-terminal portion of GPER, leaving open the question whether this truncated protein could play a functional role (120). Several vascular problems, in terms of increased blood pressure and atherosclerosis, were shown in the first two models of GPER KO (117, 118, 121–124). In order to avoid systemic influence on ERs protective effects on the heart, different mouse models were generated characterized by genetically modified cardiomyocytes. Therefore, CMs overexpressing ERα (104) or with defective expression of ERα (105) were established. They demonstrated an important role of ERα in cardiac mass development in both sexes. In particular, ERα gain of function showed a more efficient cardiac repair in female mice in comparison with male mice after ischemic injury (104). As concerns ERβ, mice overexpressing this receptor in the cardiomyocytes (116) showed an improved survival after a MI in both sexes, compared with the wild type counterparts. In addition, a more recent mouse model carrying cardiomyocyte-specific GPER-KO showed structural and functional cardiac alterations in both sexes with LV defect more pronounced in the male mice characterized by an inadequate heart remodeling (126). As extensively discussed in a very recent review (131), ER cardioprotective potential should be investigated in more detail in order to more precisely define the role played by each receptor in the heart integrity and function.

Estrogen Regulatory Role on the Heart

Cardiovascular repair and regeneration is reached by a series of mechanisms that include, on one hand, the reduction of inflammation and the formation of new vessels, on the other the survival and protection of cardiomyocytes (CMs), the activation of a cardiomyogenic process and a sort of cellular anti-aging program, i.e., an antioxidant activity. In this regard, E2 exerts many pleiotropic effects, some of which have a beneficial role on vascular endothelial cells as well as on smooth muscle and cardiac cells. The role played by estrogens in cardioprotection against I/R injury pass through nitric oxide (NO) production (132). NO seems to play several potential beneficial roles in the cardiovascular system. Estrogen increases NO bioavailability in the vascular system through both the signaling pathways (genomic and non-genomic). Through the non-genomic signaling, E2 binding to ERα lead to endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation and activation. Upon estrogen binding, caveolae membrane-associated ERα activates Src family tyrosine kinases, PI3K/AKT kinase, and ERK1,2 to stimulate eNOS in NO production (133, 134). In line with these in vitro studies, an increase of eNOS activity together with a decreased number of leukocytes normally accumulating on the vascular wall after I/R injury has been observed in mice treated with estrogen. Accordingly, treatment with inhibitors of PI3K or eNOS abolished estrogen vascular protective effect (135). It has also been reported that, in human EC, calcium ions, of great importance in the regulation of nitric oxide synthase activity, increase rapidly at physiological estrogen concentrations (136). This modulation of Ca2+ homeostasis is ERα-dependent as demonstrated by using ERα KO cells (137). More recently, an estrogen-dendrimer conjugate (EDC) was reported to selectively activate extra-nuclear ER, in both EC and CMs. However, it seems able to attenuate infarct size in mice lacking ERα expression in CMs but not in mice lacking ERα expression in EC (138). This suggests that a different mechanism may be responsible for cardioprotection in CMs and EC. As far as VSMC was concerned, it was observed that their proliferation was strictly controlled by kinase-mediated signal transduction. This kinase activity was in turn regulated by a balance between phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events. Indeed, the estrogen-mediated phosphatase activation determines the inhibition of several kinases leading to cell proliferation and migration block. In particular, VSMC proliferation was inhibited by phosphatase 2A, whose activation was mediated by interaction with ERα (139). More recently, in a mouse model with the selective blockade of the membrane-initiated ER signaling (KRRki/ki) the central action of PP2A in metabolic homeostasis has been reported (102). Non-genomic signaling pathways seem to have a key role in mediating the regulatory action of estrogens in all the cellular components of the cardiovascular system. As a matter of fact, the blockade of the non-genomic signaling impaired the transcriptional response of genes involved in the vascular function, indicating that the rapid estrogen signaling may contribute to physiological vascular gene regulatory activity (101, 103). Nonetheless, a strong cross talk between the genomic and non-genomic estrogen pathways has been hypothesized. As concerns GPER, its vasodilatory effect was analyzed by using GPER agonists in vitro (140) or in KO mouse models, as discussed above (117, 118, 121). Furthermore, accumulating literature indicates that GPER vasorelaxation in vivo could be mediated by both endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent mechanisms. In the former case, as in the arteries' relaxation, estrogen binds to GPER and leads to the production of nitric oxide in coronary EC by eNOS activation (140). In the endothelium-independent way, the E2-GPER effect on smooth muscle cells relaxation is mediated by the stimulatory activity of calcium- and voltage-activated potassium channels (67). The observed antiproliferative effect of GPER on EC (141) may provide an optimal balance for the opposite effects exerted by ERs on these cells. For example, in rat aortic EC, E2 elicits opposite effects depending on whether the signal depends on ERα or GPER (142). In fact, as for VSMC, GPER seems to act in concert with ERs in inhibiting proliferation and stimulating the differentiation rate of these cells (121, 143, 144). A GPER-mediated paradoxical effect of estrogen in vascular function (relaxation vs. contraction) was also described in porcine coronary arteries, involving the signaling pathway that passes through the transactivation of EGFR (145). Several studies have shown that estrogen prevents cardiac hypertrophy, in particular through ERβ signaling (146). Firstly, it has been shown how ERs stimulate the production of the myocyte-enriched calcineurin-interacting protein (MCIP1), an inhibitor of calcineurin activity via PI3K. In this way, ERβ signaling blocks the angiotensin II (Ang II)- or endothelin-1 (ET-1)- mediated stimulation of key hypertrophy and ventricular remodeling genes in CMs (146). Thereafter, E2 inability to prevent Ang II-induced hypertrophy and fibrosis in ERβ KO mice was also demonstrated, underscoring the relevance of ERβ in counteracting cardiac hypertrophy (111, 147). Accordingly, the same authors demonstrated that E2 exerted regulatory effects on the synthesis, localization and function of histone deacetylase (HDA) class I (pro-hypertrophic) and class II (anti-hypertrophic), important modulators of cardiac hypertrophy. In this context, ERβ activation suppressed Ang II-induced HDAC2 (class I) production and de-repressed the opposite effects of Ang II on HDAC4 and HDAC5 (class II) (148). The key role of ERβ on hypertrophy was confirmed in vivo in hearts derived from ERβ KO mice (111, 147, 148). It is well-known that Ang II stimulates cardiac hypertrophy, in part by inhibiting KLF15 expression. In turn, E2 binding to ERβ appears able to reverse Ang II action, allowing KLF15 transcriptional regulation activity on cardiac hypertrophic gene expression (149). Furthermore, ERβ plays an anti-fibrotic role influencing cardiac fibroblast homeostasis down-modulating TGFβ expression and signaling, otherwise stimulated by Ang-II (150). As regards cardiac fibroblasts, it has very recently been hypothesized that E2, either via ERα or ERβ signaling, could exert opposite effects on the synthesis and secretion of key components of the extracellular matrix, i.e., collagen I and III, by these cells (151). Regarding the debated question dealing with the possibility that GPER could or not activate an autonomous signal, it has been observed that estradiol treatment of infarcted rats improved ventricular remodeling triggering both GPER and ERα activity. Indeed, both receptors activate their membrane-specific signaling that converged into the common PI3K/AKT/eNOS pathway (152). As regards CMs, GPER was suggested to activate signaling of PI3-kinase contributing to cardioprotection in females (153). Interestingly, the PI3K pathway seems to be strictly related to autophagic processes involved in cardioprotection (154), and it has been very recently reported that GPER could counteract CM hypertrophy by up-regulating the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway, therefore modulating autophagy (155). A further mechanism of estrogen-induced cardioprotection involving GPER was investigated using its agonist (called G1) in a mouse model of I/R injury. Both G1 and E2 exerted a cardioprotective activity by inhibiting mitochondria permeability transition pore opening that normally leads to apoptotic cell death of CMs after I/R injury (47, 156). A further study demonstrated that post-ischemic GPER activation, preserving mitochondrial structural integrity, decreased ROS production and mitophagy, resulting in reduced myocardial infarct size in both sexes (157). As discussed before, specific GPER KO cardiomyocytes exhibited left ventricular dysfunction and adverse remodeling more pronounced in male KO mice than in female. Furthermore, DNA microarray analysis revealed gene expression differences between sexes, with particular reference to the mitochondrial and inflammatory pathways (126). Finally, the pivotal role of GPER and the involvement of Notch1 pathway in mediating physiopathology of female rat hearts were hypothesized (158). The effects of E2 on myocyte regeneration have also been investigated. Several studies focused on cardiomyogenesis have established that the genesis of new cardiomyocytes from the preexisting cardiomyocyte pool occurs at a low rate (159, 160). The presence of multipotent cardiac stem cells (CSCs), normally residing within the cardiac niche, has extensively been studied (161, 162) as well as CSC induction to proliferate, migrate, and undergo lineage commitment in response to infarction injury (163). Accordingly, it has been demonstrated that CSCs isolated from adult rodent hearts express stem cell surface markers (c-Kit/Sca-1) and display several stem cell functions (161, 164, 165). Indeed, c-Kit+ precursor cells, which accumulate in the infarcted area, showed increased ERα expression, suggesting a direct effect of E2 on cardiac progenitor cells in situ (166). Estrogen-replacement therapy and acute myocardial infarction were evaluated in a rat experimental model. It has been observed that estrogen-replacement therapy increases the homing of bone marrow stem cells into myocardium and stimulate angiogenesis enhancing ERα and ERβ expression (167). The possibility of ERα-mediated paracrine cardioprotective function has been proposed as one of the major mechanism used by post-infarct cardiac c-kit+ cells (i.e., inducing CM survival). Accordingly, infusion of E2 treated-CSCs into the isolated mouse hearts after acute I/R gave rises to a powerful protective effect probably due to a major production of CSC-derived protective factors (168).

Mitochondria as Subcellular Targets of Estrogen

Mitochondria drive different cellular processes by providing chemical energy and they are particularly important in heart muscle cells where mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with important pathological changes leading to impaired cardiac function (169). In fact, dysfunctional mitochondria would ultimately lead to myocardial cell apoptosis and death during I/R injuries. On the other hand, autophagy, characterized by the formation of autophagosomal vesicles containing degenerating cytoplasmic contents, is considered primarily as a cytoprotective process. Particularly, mitophagy, a selective form of autophagy, represents a protective mechanism that contributes to eliminate damaged mitochondria thus reducing mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and necrosis in the myocardium (170). Accordingly, it has been suggested that autophagy counteracts mitochondrial dysfunction by autophagosome formation, possible embedding of damaged mitochondria in autophagolysosomes and their digestion. This allows the cells to remove injured mitochondria that often represent a source of ROS. During I/R, mitochondria suffer a deficiency to supply the CMs with chemical energy also contributing to oxidative stress and to the cytosolic ionic alterations, especially of Ca2+ (171). Interestingly, it has been hypothesized that different types of cardiomyocyte calcium channels could exhibit a marked sexual dimorphism and that their function could be regulated by ERα, ERβ, and GPER, i.e., by non-nuclear estrogen receptor signals (131). Sex plays a pivotal role in the cardiac tolerance to I/R injury, and it has been reported that male myocardium is more sensitive than the female one. Recent studies have suggested that mitochondria are a major target of cardioprotective signaling (31, 172). Furthermore, numerous studies have suggested that in females mitochondria could be modified and less sensitive to I/R injury. In addition, it was reported that mitochondria from females undergo several posttranslational modifications of enzymes involved in the redox metabolism generating less ROS during the reoxygenation phase following ischemia (173–176). In particular, Colom and co-authors (174) demonstrated a significant sex difference in the function of cardiac mitochondria. Female rats showed minor cardiac mitochondria content and produced less H2O2 than male rats. On the other hand, male myocytes, thanks to the higher density of β-adrenergic receptors, are more responsive to β-adrenergic stimulation than females. This induces an increase in the influx of Ca2+ in cardiac cells. Male myocytes are thus particularly prone to calcium overload (177). According with this, it was observed an improved survival of CMs overexpressing ERβ isolated from mice of both sexes, together with a significant reduction of the maladaptive remodeling and the recovery of cardiac function after MI in comparison with wild type CMs. These effects seem to be associated to a better maintenance of Ca2+ homeostasis and to less cardiac fibrosis following MI (116). Mitochondria isolated from hearts of adult male and female rats differ in the sensitivity of the permeability transition pore (MPTP) to the calcium load. In particular, mitochondria isolated from female animals appear more resistant to swelling induced by high Ca2+ concentration. It can be hypothesized that the higher ischemic tolerance of female myocardium may be related to the lower sensitivity of MPTP to the calcium induced swelling. Accordingly, it has been observed that a specific ERβ agonist reduced mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and contribute to the preservation of mitochondrial integrity after I/R injury (178). Bcl2 protein, located at mitochondrial membranes, provides protection against pro-apoptotic stimuli (179), and its expression level is associated with improved recovery of cardiac function after I/R, and reduced infarction area due to a reduced apoptotic cell death (180). Moreover, Bcl2 prevents permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane (181) after I/R thus preventing the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria and subsequent apoptosis. To note, the expression of Bcl2 was found controlled by ERβ (182). It was also reported that the cardioprotection observed in female sex may be related to a greater protein expression of the sarcolemmal and mitochondrial K(ATP) channels. According with this, the blockade of K(ATP) channels significantly increased the damage in the female heart after I/R (183, 184). Mitochondrial dynamics (i.e., fission/fusion processes) is critical for a correct mitochondrial function, and alterations of mitochondrial dynamics have been associated with neuropathies, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progression, type 2 diabetes, and CVD (185–187). Very recently, an uncontrolled balance of mitochondrial dynamics was shown to contribute to cardiac dysfunction during I/R injury (188). Several proteins are involved in mitochondrial dynamics: for instance, mitofusins (MFN) and optic atrophy protein 1 (OPA1) participate to mitochondrial fusion process, while mitochondrial fission is manly orchestrated by dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) and fission protein 1 (FIS1) (185). Alterations in this mitochondrial dynamics produce altered mitochondria in their shape and size: a prevalence of fusogenic mechanisms favors the formation of a large mitochondrial network; on the contrary, if fission mechanisms prevail a mitochondrial fragmentation occurs (189). In different in vivo and in vitro models of ischemia or I/R, it was observed that the inhibition of DRP1 selectively blocks DRP1-dependent mitophagy, which is triggered to eliminate mitochondria damaged during the early phase of ischemia in the brain (190). After the inhibition of DRP1, CMs were found to show a significant decrease of oxygen consumption with a negligible alteration of ATP production after I/R (191). Accordingly, in I/R-induced alterations of CMs, mdivi-1, a chemical inhibitor of the mitochondrial fission protein DRP1 that induces mitochondria elongation (192), preserved the mitochondrial structure and significantly reduced the myocardial infarction area (193, 194). Current studies thus indicate that several chemical compounds prevent the alterations of mitochondrial dynamics. However, further toxicological and pharmacokinetic studies are needed before their clinical use. A very interesting role of sex hormones was reported in mitochondrial biogenesis occurring in the right ventricle after the heart failure associated with pulmonary hypertension. In particular, Liu and co-workers, by studying ovariectomized female rats, found that estrogen therapy counteracted the loss mitochondrial mass and maintain the cardiac oxidative metabolism. They therefore hypothesized that estrogen could prevent maladaptive remodeling of the right ventricle that often lead to the severe dysfunction frequently associated with pulmonary hypertension (195). Furthermore, it has also been suggested that E2 induces mitochondriogenesis in H9c2 cultured cardiomyocytes through the increase of PGC-1α expression. This effect seems to be mediated by GPER, since specific agonists of this receptor mimic the activity of estrogen (196). However, it should be underlined that other authors (197), in a study in a murine model of hemorrhagic trauma, reported that the effect exerted by estrogen on mitochondrial biogenesis and function at the cardiac level is mediated by both ERα and ERβ. Although a direct or indirect influence of estrogens on mitochondrial dynamics has not yet been observed in cardiac models, it was found that I/R injury increased ROS production, mitochondrial fission, and increased levels of DRP1 in cardiomyocytes (198). Moreover, in a DRP1 KO mouse model, a cardiac-specific impairment of left ventricular functions has also been observed. These mice died within 13 weeks through the suppression of autophagic flux, thus underlining the pivotal role of autophagy or mitophagy in CM homeostasis (e.g., maintaining the ionic equilibrium) (199). A schematic picture suggesting the possible sequence of events at mitochondrial level after I/R injury in response to activation of the putative non-nuclear ER pathway is reported in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Schematic picture suggesting the possible sequence of events at mitochondrial level after I/R injury in response to activation of the putative non-nuclear ER pathway.

Schematic picture suggesting the possible sequence of events at mitochondrial level after I/R injury in response to activation of the putative non-nuclear ER pathway.

Estrogen Regulated miRNAs and Their Effect on Myocardium and Cardiac Vascular System

Estrogens/estrogen receptor interaction regulates cardiovascular function through either gene expression or epigenetic mechanisms. This last mechanism of action is also dependent on miRNA action (200). miRNAs are highly conserved short non-coding RNAs (19-25 nucleotides) that control many developmental and cellular processes in eukaryotic organisms by post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs by binding to their 3' untranslated regions, thus triggering their translational inhibition with or without RNA degradation. miRNA expression is strongly regulated at different levels, e.g., during development and for tissue specific functions (201). Of relevance is, in fact, the role of miRNAs in regulating vascular cell aging, which in women after menopause appears similar to that detected in men (202). This obviously supports the knowledge of a regulatory role of estrogen in fertile woman. Notably, this different regulation might also rely on sex-linked miRNAs. Actually, about 120 miRNAs have been identified on human X chromosome, whereas only 4 on the Y chromosome. This appears as an intriguing result per se. In addition, although random X-inactivation should equilibrate female and male expression levels, a number of unbalancing mechanisms have emerged so far. In fact, genes escaping X chromosome inactivation could play a critical a role. Moreover, the number of these genes increases with age and it has been suggested that this could lead to an increased susceptibility of women to inflammatory and autoimmune disease (203). In this field, the interesting study of Florijn and co-workers remarked the harmful effects of the X-linked miRNAs in cardiovascular disease suggesting that the sex-biased miRNA network could play a key role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction observed in women (202). This hypothesis is only partially in accord with the suggested protective effects of estrogen regulated miRNAs reported elsewhere. Furthermore, estrogens modulate miRNA profiles also during their maturation pathway (204). Numerous lines of evidence underline the importance of estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women to restore the correct level of miRNA expression among many other aging-related physio-pathological aspects. Estrogen protective action on cardiac vascular system has prevalently been associated with the ERα signaling that is responsible of vasodilation, inhibition of inflammation and regulation of the oxidative stress also blocking apoptosis. All these processes play a role in preserving the correct function of endothelial cells, modulating vasoconstriction and inhibiting proliferation of VSMC. Specific miRNA signatures have been associated with cardiac and vascular aging under estrogen control (202). Some estrogen regulated miRNAs and their effect on cardiac and vascular cells are reported in Table 2.
Table 2

Some estrogen regulated miRNAs and their effect on myocardium and cardiac vascular system cells.

miRNAVascular cellsFunctionsTargetsReferences
miR-126-3pEndothelial cellsMigration AngiogenesisSpred1(205)
miR-221&-222Endothelial cellsInflammationETS-1(206)
miR-106bEndothelial cells VSMCApoptosisPTEN(207)
miR-143/-145VSMCProliferation ContractionACE(208)
miR-30Endothelial cells VSMCAngiogenesis Apoptosis InflammationAng2(209)
miR-203VSMCProliferationSRC, ERK(210)
miR-144Endothelial cells VSMCInflammation MetabolismCOX2 Rac1 ABCA1(211) (212) (213)
miR-146aEndothelial cellsInflammation SenescenceTRAF6, IRAK1 NOX4(214) (215)
miR-21VSMC FibroblastInflammation ProliferationPPARα, Spry1 NF1B,CDC25A(216) (217) (218)
miR-125Endothelial cellsAngiogenesisRTEF-1, VEGF(219)
miR-34Endothelial cellsSenescence InflammationSIRT-1(220, 221)
Some estrogen regulated miRNAs and their effect on myocardium and cardiac vascular system cells. MI is consequent to a protracted ischemic injury of vasculature and hypoxic conditions that are characterized by continuous deficit of cardiomyocyte oxygenation and inflammation in the infarcted area. This picture is amplified by increased oxidative stress, i.e., ROS production, and cardiac muscle cell death (222). In the attempt to reduce tissue damage, the infarcted heart undergoes a cardiac self-remodeling that frequently results in increased fibrosis, dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure (HF) (223). In this context, miRNA roles have broadly been investigated using both cardiac cell cultures and mouse models of cardiac infarction. It is now clear that miRNAs are implicated in cardiac proper functions as well as in pathogenesis of cardiac cell injury, leading to HF. For instance, some miRNAs have directly been associated with estrogen cardioprotective action against oxidative stress. The cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE), the enzyme involved in cardioprotective H2S generation (224), is indirectly regulated by miR-22 levels as miR-22 specifically down-regulates the Sp1 transcription factor, involved in CSE transcription. Indeed, 17β-estradiol treatment determines down-modulation of this miRNA by ERα action, thus reconstituting Sp1 levels both in cultured cardiomyocytes and in ovariectomized rat hearts (225). An independent risk factor for HF, and consequently for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, is cardiac hypertrophy, either concentric or eccentric. The former consists of an increase in ventricular wall thickness without chamber enlargement. The latter promotes chamber dilation with no increase or even decrease of left ventricular wall thickness (226). This remodeling is characterized by age-specific relative changes in LV mass, volumes, and chamber performance during diastolic and systolic function. Differences of this remodeling between pre- and post-menopausal women suggest a key role for estrogen. Indeed, E2 deficiency in the heart of ovariectomized mice increases the age-related ventricular concentric remodeling that, at sub-cellular level, is underlined by the functional impairment of mitochondria. The molecular mechanisms associated with this ventricular dysfunction have also been correlated to miR-23a levels. In absence of estrogens, miR-23a high level in cardiomyocytes directly targets peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ co-activator 1-α (PGC-1α) down-regulating its expression. This protein is a modulator of mitochondrial function and its heart-specific deletion has recently been associated to cardiac dilation with LV thinning (227). However, as indicated by Sun and colleagues, the E2 deficiency might mediate a possible role of PGC-1α also in concentric remodeling through the miR-23a dependent reduction (228). A rat model of myocardial ischemia showed that mortality was increased when accompanied with estrogen deprivation (due to ovariectomy). This elevated mortality was associated with miR-151-5p down-regulation. This miRNA binds to the 3′UTR of FXYD1, the gene codifying for phospholemman protein (PLM, an important regulator of ion transport and a substrate for protein kinases A and C), inhibiting its expression. PLM is known to alter cardiac membrane excitability. Thus, in the ovariectomized myocardial ischemic group of animals, the absence of estrogen, reducing miR-151-5p levels favored PML increase, with Ca2+ accumulation in cardiomyocytes eventually exacerbating cardiac malfunction (229). Finally, a recent miRNA specific microarray study on cardiomyocytes treated or not with estrogen showed an increased expression of a further miR: the miR-494. The authors correlated the expression of this miRNA with estrogen dependent cardioprotection and identified in the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) repressing factor (NKRF) the specific target of this miR in cardiomyocytes. In brief, miR-494 overexpression could mimic the estrogen specific cardioprotection reducing the oxidative stress-induced injury (230).

Conclusions

In this paper we summarized some molecular mechanisms that lead to favorable or unfavorable evolution of remodeling of the heart after injury, e.g., in I/R, and how these mechanisms may depend on the effect of sex hormones, of estrogen non-genomic effects in particular. On the basis of the results described above, it appears well-documented that all cell components of the cardiovascular system (such as cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, as well as endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells) of males and females, also in virtue of their hormonal differences, differently counteract exogenous or endogenous insults. In this context, the emerging role of non-genomic effects of estrogen on cardiovascular cell homeostasis and remodeling could represent a formidable, novel challenge for this field of investigation. The idea that a prompt, very rapid, i.e., in seconds, response could be played out in order to counteract an injury appears fascinating as well as conceivable: the “classical” genomic activity of hormones appears, in our mind, as too slow in order to face damage and to survive. However, apart from the possible role of this mechanism in the evolution of the species (which should merit a specific discussion), the influence of the estrogen hormone and its pathways in determining cardiovascular cell homeostasis appears as pivotal and should merit more targeted analyses. A last point deals with sex-specific studies. Although many experimental studies dealing with the analysis of sex differences in the cardiovascular system, either in physiological or in pathological conditions, have been published in the recent years, the molecular mechanisms whereby sex specificities may influence the remodeling and the adaptive response to injury are still to be defined in detail. As a general rule, these studies suggested resilience as a milestone of the female sex, including cellular and tissue responses to environmental insults. Experimental studies, e.g., in freshly isolated cells from males and females are, however, quite complicated. The use of “typical” cultured cells is in fact useless in this field since the great majority of cell lines derive from cancer cells or from established highly proliferating cell lines and we know that these models do not adequately apply to the study of vascular or cardiac cells. Hence, the main bias in the study of the different response of XX and XY cells is the availability of strong and effective cell models. Thus, the influence of hormones, sex hormones in particular, on cardiovascular cell system homeostasis in males and females represents a complex challenge that should properly be investigated in the next years by using cell pathology approaches in parallel with in vivo analyses. One further important issue should be referred to hormone variations in the lifespan of men and women that, due to its peculiarities, can be fully investigated neither in vitro nor in vivo. Consequently, translation of the results obtained in these experimental studies into clinical practice cannot be performed or it should be performed, when appropriate, very carefully. Notwithstanding this, experimental studies appear indispensable: clinical data are often descriptive rising questions to which mechanistic studies could try to answer. To do this, preclinical studies that incorporate both sexes will be crucial to allow the translation of information from basic research to clinical practice.

Author Contributions

RP expert in the field of experimental model studies, i.e., animal studies. GMat looked at the aspects referred as to the role of micro RNA. PM followed the aspects dealing with the role of mitochondria in cellular remodeling. GMar contributed for the clinical aspects of cardiovascular disease. WM and AC conceived the work and supervised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  227 in total

1.  Immunolocalisation of oestrogen receptor beta in human tissues.

Authors:  A H Taylor; F Al-Azzawi
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.098

2.  Cell-surface estrogen receptors mediate calcium-dependent nitric oxide release in human endothelia.

Authors:  G B Stefano; V Prevot; J C Beauvillain; P Cadet; C Fimiani; I Welters; G L Fricchione; C Breton; P Lassalle; M Salzet; T V Bilfinger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Cdk1, PKCδ and calcineurin-mediated Drp1 pathway contributes to mitochondrial fission-induced cardiomyocyte death.

Authors:  Ivan Zaja; Xiaowen Bai; Yanan Liu; Chika Kikuchi; Svjetlana Dosenovic; Yasheng Yan; Scott G Canfield; Zeljko J Bosnjak
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 4.  Mitochondrial Bioenergetics During Ischemia and Reperfusion.

Authors:  Alicia E Consolini; María I Ragone; Patricia Bonazzola; Germán A Colareda
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Non-nuclear estrogen receptor alpha activation in endothelium reduces cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice.

Authors:  Sara Menazza; Junhui Sun; Swathi Appachi; Ken L Chambliss; Sung Hoon Kim; Angel Aponte; Sohaib Khan; John A Katzenellenbogen; Benita S Katzenellenbogen; Philip W Shaul; Elizabeth Murphy
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.000

6.  Sex differences in the phosphorylation of mitochondrial proteins result in reduced production of reactive oxygen species and cardioprotection in females.

Authors:  Claudia J Lagranha; Anne Deschamps; Angel Aponte; Charles Steenbergen; Elizabeth Murphy
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  An estrogen receptor-alpha knock-in mutation provides evidence of ligand-independent signaling and allows modulation of ligand-induced pathways in vivo.

Authors:  Kerstin W Sinkevicius; Joanna E Burdette; Karolina Woloszyn; Sylvia C Hewitt; Katherine Hamilton; Sonia L Sugg; Karla A Temple; Fredric E Wondisford; Kenneth S Korach; Teresa K Woodruff; Geoffrey L Greene
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.736

8.  Aromatase inhibition attenuates desflurane-induced preconditioning against acute myocardial infarction in male mouse heart in vivo.

Authors:  Virginija Jazbutyte; Jan Stumpner; Andreas Redel; Johan M Lorenzen; Norbert Roewer; Thomas Thum; Franz Kehl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and robustly myogenic: c-kit expression is necessary but not sufficient for their identification.

Authors:  Carla Vicinanza; Iolanda Aquila; Mariangela Scalise; Francesca Cristiano; Fabiola Marino; Eleonora Cianflone; Teresa Mancuso; Pina Marotta; Walter Sacco; Fiona C Lewis; Liam Couch; Victoria Shone; Giulia Gritti; Annalaura Torella; Andrew J Smith; Cesare Mn Terracciano; Domenico Britti; Pierangelo Veltri; Ciro Indolfi; Bernardo Nadal-Ginard; Georgina M Ellison-Hughes; Daniele Torella
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  Mammalian heart renewal by pre-existing cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Samuel E Senyo; Matthew L Steinhauser; Christie L Pizzimenti; Vicky K Yang; Lei Cai; Mei Wang; Ting-Di Wu; Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern; Claude P Lechene; Richard T Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  The Effect of Sex Differences on Endothelial Function and Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Hypertriglyceridemia.

Authors:  Zi Ren; Jiayi Guo; Xingxing Xiao; Jiana Huang; Manchao Li; Ruibin Cai; Haitao Zeng
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 2.  Nexus between PI3K/AKT and Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Aditi S Khatpe; Adedeji K Adebayo; Christopher A Herodotou; Brijesh Kumar; Harikrishna Nakshatri
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Sex differences in the blood-brain barrier and neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Callie M Weber; Alisa Morss Clyne
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 4.  Molecular Mechanisms of Endocrine Resistance in Estrogen-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Esmael Besufikad Belachew; Dareskedar Tsehay Sewasew
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 5.  Sex-Gender Disparities in Cardiovascular Diseases: The Effects of Estrogen on eNOS, Lipid Profile, and NFATs During Catecholamine Stress.

Authors:  Marie Louise Ndzie Noah; Gabriel Komla Adzika; Richard Mprah; Adebayo Oluwafemi Adekunle; Joseph Adu-Amankwaah; Hong Sun
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 6.  Role of Biological Sex in the Cardiovascular-Gut Microbiome Axis.

Authors:  Shuangyue Li; Georgios Kararigas
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 7.  Oestrogenic Regulation of Mitochondrial Dynamics.

Authors:  Siavash Beikoghli Kalkhoran; Georgios Kararigas
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Chronic GPER1 Activation Protects Against Oxidative Stress-Induced Cardiomyoblast Death via Preservation of Mitochondrial Integrity and Deactivation of Mammalian Sterile-20-Like Kinase/Yes-Associated Protein Pathway.

Authors:  Abdulhafiz Imam Aliagan; Ngonidzashe B Madungwe; Nathalie Tombo; Yansheng Feng; Jean C Bopassa
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Cardiac GRK2 Protein Levels Show Sexual Dimorphism during Aging and Are Regulated by Ovarian Hormones.

Authors:  Alba C Arcones; Melanie Raquel Martínez-Cignoni; Rocío Vila-Bedmar; Claudia Yáñez; Isabel Lladó; Ana M Proenza; Federico Mayor; Cristina Murga
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 10.  Sex-Related Effects on Cardiac Development and Disease.

Authors:  Georgios Siokatas; Ioanna Papatheodorou; Angeliki Daiou; Antigone Lazou; Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Georgios Kararigas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.