Literature DB >> 31708717

Prediction of shock arrival times from CME and flare data.

Marlon Núñez1, Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla2,3, Antti Pulkkinen2.   

Abstract

This paper presents the Shock ARrival Model (SARM) for predicting shock arrival times for distances from 0.72 AU to 8.7 AU by using coronal mass ejections (CME) and flare data. SARM is an aerodynamic drag model described by a differential equation that has been calibrated with a dataset of 120 shocks observed from 1997 to 2010 by minimizing the mean absolute error (MAE), normalized to 1 AU. SARM should be used with CME data (radial, earthward or plane-of-sky speeds), and flare data (peak flux, duration, and location). In the case of 1 AU, the MAE and the median of absolute errors were 7.0 h and 5.0 h respectively, using the available CME/flare data. The best results for 1 AU (an MAE of 5.8 h) were obtained using both CME data, either radial or cone-model-estimated speeds, and flare data. For the prediction of shock arrivals at distances from 0.72 AU to 8.7 AU, the normalized MAE and the median were 7.1 h and 5.1 h respectively, using the available CME/flare data. SARM was also calibrated to be used with CME data alone or flare data alone, obtaining normalized MAE errors of 8.9 h and 8.6 h respectively for all shock events. The model verification was carried out with an additional dataset of 20 shocks observed from 2010 to 2012 with radial CME speeds to compare SARM with the empirical ESA model [Gopalswamy et al., 2005a] and the numerical MHD-based ENLIL model [Odstrcil et al., 2004]. The results show that the ENLIL's MAE was lower than the SARM's MAE, which was lower than the ESA's MAE. The SARM's best results were obtained when both flare and true CME speeds were used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Space Weather; modeling; shock arrival time prediction

Year:  2016        PMID: 31708717      PMCID: PMC6839697          DOI: 10.1002/2016SW001361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Space Weather        ISSN: 1542-7390            Impact factor:   4.456


  1 in total

1.  Benchmark studies of the effectiveness of structural and internal materials as radiation shielding for the international space station.

Authors:  J Miller; C Zeitlin; F A Cucinotta; L Heilbronn; D Stephens; J W Wilson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.