| Literature DB >> 31708667 |
M Levkut1,3, V Revajová1, M Levkutová1, E Selecká2, Z Ševčíková1, V Karaffová1, M Levkut1,3.
Abstract
The study examined subpopulations of lymphocytes in peripheral blood, spleen, and jejunum including morphology of that segment in broiler chicken farm after treatment with flubendazole (Flimabend) and natural extract from chestnut wood (Farmatan). A total of 24 forty-day-old Kalimero-Super Master hybrid chickens were divided into 4 groups (n=6): the Fli group received Flimabend per os, 100 mg/g suspension in 1.43 mg of active substance/kg body weight during 7 day of experiment, Far group received Farmatan per os at 0.2 % concentration for 6 hours per day during 5 day (experimental days - from 3 to 7); the Far+Fli group received a combination of doses administered in the same way as for the first two groups; and control -C group with no active substance administration. The results demonstrated mild increase of leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, leucocyte common antigen CD45, IgM+ and IgA+ cells in peripheral blood after administration of Flimabend. Similarly, subpopulations of followed lymphocytes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, IgM+) were increased in the jejunum after application of that drug. On the other hand, administration of Farmatan revealed opposite effect on determined immunocompetent cells what proves anti-inflammatory effect. Morphology of villi was also negatively influenced by administration of Flimabend. Administration of Farmatan suggests also its preventive administration in chickens. This tanin-containing drug as plant natural product may be used due to its antibacterial activity and as promising alternative to conventional drug with possible antihelminthic effect.Entities:
Keywords: Farmatan; Flubendazol; chicken; immunity; intestine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31708667 PMCID: PMC6818629 DOI: 10.2478/helm-2019-0029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Helminthologia ISSN: 0440-6605 Impact factor: 1.184
Absolute count of white blood cells (WBC; G.L–1= 109. L–1) in the peripheral blood of chickens (mean ± SD).
| WBC | C | Far | Fli | Far+Fli |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leukocytes | 13.72 ± 2.71 | 8.85 ± 2.92a | 14.58 ± 3.02b | 14.40 ± 3.46b |
| Lymphocytes | 6.68 ± 0.35 | 5.44 ± 1.57a | 8.63 ± 1.53d | 8.37 ± 0.72d |
| Heterophiles | 6.23 ± 2.44 | 2.65 ± 1.41 | 4.91 ± 2.39 | 4.63 ± 3.18 |
| Eosinophiles | 0.53 ± 0.23 | 0.47 ± 0.19 | 0.61 ± 0.34 | 0.88 ± 0.34 |
| Monocytes | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.07a | 0.44 ± 0.14 | 0.46 ± 0.12b |
Specific superscripts in row indicate significant differences – abP<0.05; adP<0.001
Subpopulations of lymphocytes in the peripheral blood (total counts = G.L–1) and spleen (relative percentage)(mean ± SD).
| Peripheral blood | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Subpopulations of lymphocytes (mean ± SD) | |||||
| CD3 | CD4 | CD8 | IgM | IgA | CD45 | |
| C | 2.33 ± 0.79 | 1.32 ± 0.44 | 0.80 ± 0.20 | 0.85 ± 0.24 | 0.29 ± 0.26 | 4.32 ± 0.62 |
| Far | 2.37 ± 1.08 | 1.45 ± 0.63 | 0.72 ± 0.37 | 0.58 ± 0.23a | 0.13 ± 0.11c | 2.89 ± 1.01a |
| Fli | 3.12 ± 0.90 | 1.82 ± 0.71 | 0.84 ± 0.19 | 1.20 ± 0.32c | 0.70 ± 0.39a | 5.42 ± 1.05d |
| Far+Fli | 3.05 ± 0.73 | 1.99 ± 0.69 | 0.75 ± 0.18 | 0.95 ± 0.22 | 0.26 ± 0.12c | 5.18 ± 0.84d |
Specific superscripts in columns indicate significant differences – abP<0.05; acP<0.01; adP<0.001
Subpopulations of lymphocytes in jejunal mucosa (mm2).
| Subpopulations | C | Far | Fli | Far+Fli |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3 | 598.90 ± 204.20d | 312.00 ± 105.10a | 680.10 ± 186.80d | 672.30 ± 252.00d |
| CD4 | 614.40 ± 187.00d | 282.00 ± 94.69a | 641.70 ± 185.40da | 547.10 ± 151.70dc |
| CD8 | 770.10 ± 213.40d | 388.60 ± 159.50a | 794.20 ± 257.30d | 743.20 ± 220.20d |
| IgM | 203.90 ± 122.30a | 146.70 ± 91.80c | 216.00 ± 88.14a | 149.60 ± 73.22bc |
| IgA | 331.10 ± 162.40 | 250.80 ± 180.40 | 294.10 ± 200.20 | 274.60 ± 160.40 |
Specific superscripts in row indicate significant differences – abP<0.05; acP<0.01; adP<0.001
Fig. 1Height of duodenal villi (mean±SD, adP>0.001).
Fig. 5Histological pictures from duodenum of different chicken’ groups (HE stain).
Fig. 2Cutting surface of duodenal villi (mean±SD, abP>0.05, adP>0.001).
Fig. 3Height of jejunal villi (mean±SD, abP<0.05,*adP<0.001).
Fig. 6Histological pictures from jejunum of different chicken’ groups (HE stain).
Fig. 4Cutting surface of jejunal villi (mean±SD, *abP<0.05, adP<0.001).