Michael Ahmadi1, Inga Laumeier2, Thomas Ihl2, Maureen Steinicke2, Caroline Ferse2, Matthias Endres3, Armin Grau4, Sidsel Hastrup5, Holger Poppert6, Frederick Palm4, Martin Schoene2, Christian L Seifert6, Farid I Kandil7, Joachim E Weber1, Paul von Weitzel-Mudersbach5, Martin L J Wimmer8, Ale Algra9, Pierre Amarenco10, Jacoba P Greving9, Otto Busse11, Friedrich Köhler12, Peter Marx2, Heinrich J Audebert13. 1. Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. 2. Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 3. Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany. 4. Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany. 5. The Danish Stroke Centre, Neurology, University Hospital Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark. 6. Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. 7. Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Institute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 8. Praxis für Neurologie und Psychiatrie am Prinzregentenplatz, Munich, Germany. 9. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery and Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. 10. Department of Neurology and Stroke Centre, Bichat Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. 11. German Stroke Society, Berlin, Germany. 12. Medical Department, Division of Cardiology and Angiology, Campus Charité Mitte, Centre for Cardiovascular Telemedicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 13. Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: Heinrich.audebert@charite.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack are at high risk for a further vascular event, possibly leading to permanent disability or death. Although evidence-based treatments for secondary prevention are available, many patients do not achieve recommended behavioural modifications and pharmaceutical prevention targets in the long-term. We aimed to investigate whether a support programme for enhanced secondary prevention can reduce the frequency of recurrent vascular events. METHODS:INSPiRE-TMS was an open-label, multicentre, international randomised controlled trial done at seven German hospitals with acute stroke units and a Danish stroke centre. Patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack within 2 weeks from study enrolment and at least one modifiable risk factor (ie, arterial hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, or smoking) were included. Computerised randomisation was used to allocate patients (1:1) either to the support programme in addition to conventional care or to conventional care alone. The support programme used feedback and motivational interviewing strategies with eight outpatient visits over 2 years aiming to improve adherence to secondary prevention targets. The primary outcome was the composite of major vascular events consisting of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and vascular death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who underwent randomisation, did not withdraw study participation, and had at least one follow-up). Outcomes were assessed at annual follow-ups using time-to-first-event analysis. All-cause death was monitored as a safety outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01586702. FINDINGS:From Aug 22, 2011, to Oct 30, 2017, we enrolled 2098 patients. Of those, 1048 (50·0%) were randomly assigned to the support programme group and 1050 (50·0%) patients were assigned to the conventional care group. 1030 (98·3%) patients in the support group and 1042 (99·2%) patients in the conventional care group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of analysed participants was 67·4 years and 700 (34%) were women. After a mean follow-up of 3·6 years, the primary outcome of major vascular events had occurred in 163 (15·8%) of 1030 patients of the support programme group and in 175 (16·8%) of 1042 patients of the conventional care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·75-1·14). Total major vascular event numbers were 209 for the support programme group and 225 for the conventional care group (incidence rate ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·77-1·12; p=0·46) and all-cause death occurred in 73 (7·1%) patients in the support programme group and 85 (8·2%) patients in the conventional care group (HR 0·85, 0·62-1·17). More patients in the support programme group achieved secondary prevention targets (eg, in 1-year-follow-up 52% vs 42% [p<0·0001] for blood pressure, 62% vs 54% [p=0·0010] for LDL, 33% vs 19% [p<0·0001] for physical activity, and 51% vs 34% [p=0·0010] for smoking cessation). INTERPRETATION: Provision of an intensified secondary prevention programme in patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack was associated with improved achievement of secondary prevention targets but did not lead to a significantly lower rate of major vascular events. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of support programmes in selected patients who do not achieve secondary prevention targets soon after discharge. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Pfizer, and German Stroke Foundation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack are at high risk for a further vascular event, possibly leading to permanent disability or death. Although evidence-based treatments for secondary prevention are available, many patients do not achieve recommended behavioural modifications and pharmaceutical prevention targets in the long-term. We aimed to investigate whether a support programme for enhanced secondary prevention can reduce the frequency of recurrent vascular events. METHODS: INSPiRE-TMS was an open-label, multicentre, international randomised controlled trial done at seven German hospitals with acute stroke units and a Danish stroke centre. Patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack within 2 weeks from study enrolment and at least one modifiable risk factor (ie, arterial hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, or smoking) were included. Computerised randomisation was used to allocate patients (1:1) either to the support programme in addition to conventional care or to conventional care alone. The support programme used feedback and motivational interviewing strategies with eight outpatient visits over 2 years aiming to improve adherence to secondary prevention targets. The primary outcome was the composite of major vascular events consisting of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and vascular death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who underwent randomisation, did not withdraw study participation, and had at least one follow-up). Outcomes were assessed at annual follow-ups using time-to-first-event analysis. All-cause death was monitored as a safety outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01586702. FINDINGS: From Aug 22, 2011, to Oct 30, 2017, we enrolled 2098 patients. Of those, 1048 (50·0%) were randomly assigned to the support programme group and 1050 (50·0%) patients were assigned to the conventional care group. 1030 (98·3%) patients in the support group and 1042 (99·2%) patients in the conventional care group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of analysed participants was 67·4 years and 700 (34%) were women. After a mean follow-up of 3·6 years, the primary outcome of major vascular events had occurred in 163 (15·8%) of 1030 patients of the support programme group and in 175 (16·8%) of 1042 patients of the conventional care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·75-1·14). Total major vascular event numbers were 209 for the support programme group and 225 for the conventional care group (incidence rate ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·77-1·12; p=0·46) and all-cause death occurred in 73 (7·1%) patients in the support programme group and 85 (8·2%) patients in the conventional care group (HR 0·85, 0·62-1·17). More patients in the support programme group achieved secondary prevention targets (eg, in 1-year-follow-up 52% vs 42% [p<0·0001] for blood pressure, 62% vs 54% [p=0·0010] for LDL, 33% vs 19% [p<0·0001] for physical activity, and 51% vs 34% [p=0·0010] for smoking cessation). INTERPRETATION: Provision of an intensified secondary prevention programme in patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack was associated with improved achievement of secondary prevention targets but did not lead to a significantly lower rate of major vascular events. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of support programmes in selected patients who do not achieve secondary prevention targets soon after discharge. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Pfizer, and German Stroke Foundation.
Authors: Felizitas A Eichner; Christopher J Schwarzbach; Moritz Keller; Karl Georg Haeusler; Gerhard F Hamann; Dirk Sander; Heinrich J Audebert; Klaus Gröschel; Dieter Geis; Stephan von Bandemer; Viktoria Rücker; Martha Schutzmeier; Peter Ulrich Heuschmann; Armin Grau Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2020-03-12
Authors: Peter Willeit; Thomas Toell; Christian Boehme; Stefan Krebs; Lukas Mayer; Clemens Lang; Lisa Seekircher; Lena Tschiderer; Karin Willeit; Gerhard Rumpold; Gudrun Schoenherr; Andrea Griesmacher; Julia Ferrari; Michael Knoflach; Wilfried Lang; Stefan Kiechl; Johann Willeit Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-07-28
Authors: Gregory Y H Lip; Deirdre A Lane; Radosław Lenarczyk; Giuseppe Boriani; Wolfram Doehner; Laura A Benjamin; Marc Fisher; Deborah Lowe; Ralph L Sacco; Renate Schnabel; Caroline Watkins; George Ntaios; Tatjana Potpara Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 35.855
Authors: Stephen Barrett; Stephen Begg; Paul O'Halloran; Owen Howlett; Jack Lawrence; Michael Kingsley Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Neil Heron; Sean R O'Connor; Frank Kee; Jonathan Mant; Margaret E Cupples; Michael Donnelly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Neil Heron; Seán R O'Connor; Frank Kee; David R Thompson; Neil Anderson; David Cutting; Margaret E Cupples; Michael Donnelly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah K Schäfer; Robert Fleischmann; Bettina von Sarnowski; Dominic Bläsing; Agnes Flöel; Susanne Wurm Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.692