Literature DB >> 31708296

Updated Results of PURE-01 with Preliminary Activity of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Carcinoma with Variant Histologies.

Andrea Necchi1, Daniele Raggi2, Andrea Gallina3, Russell Madison4, Maurizio Colecchia2, Roberta Lucianò3, Rodolfo Montironi5, Patrizia Giannatempo2, Elena Farè2, Filippo Pederzoli3, Marco Bandini3, Marco Bianchi3, Renzo Colombo3, Giorgio Gandaglia3, Nicola Fossati3, Laura Marandino2, Umberto Capitanio3, Federico Dehò3, Siraj M Ali4, Jon H Chung4, Jeffrey S Ross6, Andrea Salonia7, Alberto Briganti7, Francesco Montorsi7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with predominant variant histology (VH) of bladder tumors, defined as involving >50 % of the tumor specimens, are typically excluded from clinical trials, and for these patients, the efficacy of standard chemotherapy is limited.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activity of preoperative pembrolizumab in patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC) and VH, enrolled in PURE-01 study (NCT02736266). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In the open-label, single-arm, phase 2 PURE-01 study, three courses of 200 mg pembrolizumab preceding radical cystectomy (RC) were administered in T2-4aN0M0 MIBC patients. The amended study design included patients with predominant VH. INTERVENTION: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and RC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Pathological complete response (pT0) in intention-to-treat population was the primary endpoint. Biomarker analyses included programmed cell-death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression using the combined positive score (CPS; Dako 22C3 antibody) and comprehensive genomic profiling (FoundationOne assay). Multivariable logistic regression analyses (MVAs) evaluated the histological category (predominant VH vs nonpredominant VH vs pure urothelial carcinoma), tumor mutational burden (TMB) and CPS in association with the pathological response. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From February 2017 to June 2019, 114 patients were enrolled; 34 (30%) of them presented with VH, including 19 (17%) with predominant VH. In total, the pT0 rate was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28-46) and the pT ≤ 1 rate was 55% (95% CI: 46-65). The majority of predominant VH patients presented with squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC; N = 7), and six of seven (86%) had downstaging to pT ≤ 1, with one pT0; two of three lymphoepithelioma-like (LEL) variants had a pT0 response. None of the remaining nine predominant VHs had a response. On MVA, TMB and CPS were associated with both the pT0 and the pT ≤ 1 response, regardless of tumor histology.
CONCLUSIONS: The updated PURE-01 results confirm the activity of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in MIBC. Patients with SCC and LEL features may be suitable for neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. CPS and TMB are the key response predictors irrespective of the histological subtypes. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In the PURE-01 study, we have preliminarily evaluated the activity of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with predominant variant histology (VH). Of these patients, those harboring squamous-cell carcinoma or a lymphoepithelioma-like variant feature had major, although preliminary, pathological responses compared with those with other predominant VHs. Expression of programmed cell-death ligand-1 and tumor mutational burden may predict the pathological response to pembrolizumab, and provide a rationale for selecting patients according to these features instead of the histological bladder cancer subtypes.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Muscle-invasive bladder cancer; Neoadjuvant immunotherapy; Pembrolizumab; Variant histologies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708296     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  50 in total

Review 1.  Coming of Age of Immunotherapy of Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  Enrique Grande; Javier Molina-Cerrillo; Andrea Necchi
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 2.  Defining cisplatin eligibility in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Di Maria Jiang; Shilpa Gupta; Abhijat Kitchlu; Alejandro Meraz-Munoz; Scott A North; Nimira S Alimohamed; Normand Blais; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Intratumoral T cell depletion following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer is associated with poor clinical outcome.

Authors:  Shabaz Sultan; Mark A J Gorris; I Jolanda M de Vries; Niven Mehra; Sandra van Wilpe; Diederik M Somford; Heidi V N Kusters-Vandevelde; Rutger H T Koornstra; Winald R Gerritsen; Michiel Simons; Antoine G van der Heijden
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  The impact of histological variants on outcomes after open radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: results from a single tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Richard Naspro; Marco Finati; Marco Roscigno; Federico Pellucchi; Giovanni La Croce; Mario Sodano; Michele Manica; Daniela Chinaglia; Luigi F Da Pozzo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Positive Ki-67 and PD-L1 expression in post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy muscle-invasive bladder cancer is associated with shorter overall survival: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Selene Rubino; Youngchul Kim; Junmin Zhou; Jasreman Dhilon; Roger Li; Philippe Spiess; Michael Poch; Brandon J Manley; Julio Pow-Sang; Scott Gilbert; Wade Sexton; Jingsong Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  PD-L1 testing in urothelial bladder cancer: essentials of clinical practice.

Authors:  Julien Adam; Yves Allory; Mathieu Rouanne; Camélia Radulescu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  [Systemic treatment of bladder cancer].

Authors:  Alexander Tamalunas; Gerald B Schulz; Severin Rodler; Maria Apfelbeck; Christian G Stief; Jozefina Casuscelli
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Predicting the Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Bandini; Jeffrey S Ross; Daniele Raggi; Andrea Gallina; Maurizio Colecchia; Roberta Lucianò; Patrizia Giannatempo; Elena Farè; Filippo Pederzoli; Marco Bianchi; Renzo Colombo; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Laura Marandino; Umberto Capitanio; Federico Deho'; Siraj M Ali; Russell Madison; Jon H Chung; Andrea Salonia; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Necchi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Treatments Outcomes in Histological Variants and Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Nicolas Epaillard; Pauline Parent; Yohann Loriot; Pernelle Lavaud; E-B Vera-Cea; Nieves Martinez-Chanza; Alejo Rodriguez-Vida; Clement Dumont; Rebeca Lozano; Casilda Llácer; Raffaele Ratta; Stephane Oudard; Constance Thibault; Edouard Auclin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Galsky; Arjun V Balar; Peter C Black; Matthew T Campbell; Gail S Dykstra; Petros Grivas; Shilpa Gupta; Christoper J Hoimes; Lidia P Lopez; Joshua J Meeks; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Neal Shore; Gary D Steinberg; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 13.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.