Literature DB >> 31708239

Upper body kinematic differences between maximum front crawl and backstroke swimming.

Tomohiro Gonjo1, Ricardo J Fernandes2, João Paulo Vilas-Boas2, Ross Sanders3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate why front crawl is faster than backstroke from a kinematic perspective. Three-dimensional kinematics were obtained from one upper-limb cycle of ten male competitive swimmers performing 50 m front crawl and backstroke trials at maximum speed. Swimmers achieved faster centre of mass velocity in front crawl than backstroke (1.70 ± 0.04 vs 1.54 ± 0.06 m·s-1; p < 0.01) with no difference in stroke length (2.00 ± 0.25 vs 2.07 ± 0.17 m·cycle-1), while stroke frequency in front crawl was higher than that in backstroke (51.67 ± 6.38 vs 44.81 ± 4.68 cycles·min-1; p < 0.01). Maximum shoulder roll angle in front crawl was larger than that in backstroke (52.88 ± 4.89 vs 49.73 ± 5.73°; p < 0.05), while swimmers had smaller maximum hip roll in front crawl than backstroke (33.79 ± 6.07 vs 39.83 ± 7.25°; p < 0.05). Absolute duration of the release phase (from the last backward movement to the exit from the water of the wrist) and relative duration of the recovery phase were shorter in front crawl than backstroke (0.07 ± 0.03 vs 0.26 ± 0.08 s; p < 0.01, and 28.69 ± 2.50 vs 33.21 ± 1.43%; p < 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, front crawl is faster than backstroke because of its higher stroke frequency due to the shorter absolute release phase and relative recovery phase durations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternating strokes; Aquatic locomotion; Motion analysis; Performance; Stroke frequency; Stroke length

Year:  2019        PMID: 31708239     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  Body roll amplitude and timing in backstroke swimming and their differences from front crawl at the same swimming intensities.

Authors:  Tomohiro Gonjo; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ross Sanders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Are the 50 m Race Segments Changed From Heats to Finals at the 2021 European Swimming Championships?

Authors:  Raúl Arellano; Jesús J Ruiz-Navarro; Tiago M Barbosa; Gracia López-Contreras; Esther Morales-Ortíz; Ana Gay; Óscar López-Belmonte; Ángela González-Ponce; Francisco Cuenca-Fernández
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Novel Method for Estimating Propulsive Force Generated by Swimmers' Hands Using Inertial Measurement Units and Pressure Sensors.

Authors:  Tomoya Kadi; Tomohito Wada; Kenzo Narita; Takaaki Tsunokawa; Hirotoshi Mankyu; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Futoshi Ogita
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  A Portable and Flexible Self-Powered Multifunctional Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring in Swimming.

Authors:  Yupeng Mao; Yongsheng Zhu; Tianming Zhao; Changjun Jia; Meiyue Bian; Xinxing Li; Yuanguo Liu; Baodan Liu
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.