Literature DB >> 31707832

Patients with High Genome-Wide Polygenic Risk Scores for Coronary Artery Disease May Receive Greater Clinical Benefit from Alirocumab Treatment in the Odyssey Outcomes Trial.

Amy Damask1, P Gabriel Steg2, Gregory G Schwartz3, Michael Szarek4, Emil Hagström5, Lina Badimon6, M John Chapman7, Catherine Boileau8, Sotirios Tsimikas9, Henry N Ginsberg10, Poulabi Banerjee1, Garen Manvelian1, Robert Pordy1, Sibylle Hess11, John D Overton1, Luca A Lotta1, George D Yancopoulos1, Goncalo R Abecasis1, Aris Baras1, Charles Paulding1.   

Abstract

Background: Alirocumab, an antibody that blocks proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), was associated with reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and death in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. In this study, higher baseline LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels predicted greater benefit from alirocumab treatment. Recent studies indicate high polygenic risk scores (PRS) for coronary artery disease (CAD) identify individuals at higher risk who derive increased benefit from statins. Herein we perform post hoc analyses to determine whether high PRS for CAD identifies higher-risk individuals, independently from baseline LDLC and other known risk factors, who might derive greater benefit from alirocumab treatment.
Methods: ODYSSEY OUTCOMES was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing alirocumab or placebo in 18,924 patients with acute coronary syndrome and elevated atherogenic lipoproteins despite optimized statin treatment. The primary endpoint (MACE) comprised death from CAD, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. A genome-wide PRS for CAD comprising 6,579,025 genetic variants was evaluated in 11,953 patients with available DNA samples. Analysis of MACE risk was performed in placebo treated patients while treatment benefit analysis was performed in all patients.
Results: The incidence of MACE in the placebo group was related to PRS for CAD: 17.0% for high PRS patients (>90th percentile) and 11.4% for lower PRS patients (≤90th percentile) (p<0.001); this PRS relationship was not explained by baseline LDL-C or other established risk factors. Both the absolute and relative reduction of MACE by alirocumab compared to placebo was greater in high versus low PRS patients. There was an absolute reduction by alirocumab in high versus low PRS groups of 6.0% and 1.5%, respectively, and relative risk reduction by alirocumab of 37% in the high PRS group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.86; p = 0.004) versus 13% reduction in the low PRS group (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.98; p=0.022; interaction p = 0.04). Conclusions: A high PRS for CAD is associated with elevated risk for recurrent MACE after ACS, and larger absolute and relative risk reduction with alirocumab treatment, providing an independent tool for risk stratification and precision medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31707832     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  43 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Focus: Highlights from the 2019 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions.

Authors:  Anurag Mehta; Dhruv Mahtta; Martha Gulati; Laurence S Sperling; Roger S Blumenthal; Salim S Virani
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Validation of a Genome-Wide Polygenic Score for Coronary Artery Disease in South Asians.

Authors:  Minxian Wang; Ramesh Menon; Sanghamitra Mishra; Aniruddh P Patel; Mark Chaffin; Deepak Tanneeru; Manjari Deshmukh; Oshin Mathew; Sanika Apte; Christina S Devanboo; Sumathi Sundaram; Praveena Lakshmipathy; Sakthivel Murugan; Krishna Kumar Sharma; Karthikeyan Rajendran; Sam Santhosh; Rajesh Thachathodiyl; Hisham Ahamed; Aniketh Vijay Balegadde; Thomas Alexander; Krishnan Swaminathan; Rajeev Gupta; Ajit S Mullasari; Alben Sigamani; Muralidhar Kanchi; Andrew S Peterson; Adam S Butterworth; John Danesh; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Aliya Naheed; Michael Inouye; Rajiv Chowdhury; Ramprasad L Vedam; Sekar Kathiresan; Ravi Gupta; Amit V Khera
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  [Update on PCSK9 inhibition].

Authors:  Julius L Katzmann; Florian Custodis; Stephan H Schirmer; Ulrich Laufs
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Genome-Wide Polygenic Score, Clinical Risk Factors, and Long-Term Trajectories of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  George Hindy; Krishna G Aragam; Kenney Ng; Mark Chaffin; Luca A Lotta; Aris Baras; Isabel Drake; Marju Orho-Melander; Olle Melander; Sekar Kathiresan; Amit V Khera
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 5.  Polygenic risk score as clinical utility in psychiatry: a clinical viewpoint.

Authors:  Masashi Ikeda; Takeo Saito; Tetsufumi Kanazawa; Nakao Iwata
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 6.  Pharmacogenetics to guide cardiovascular drug therapy.

Authors:  Julio D Duarte; Larisa H Cavallari
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Integrated Polygenic Tool Substantially Enhances Coronary Artery Disease Prediction.

Authors:  Vincent Plagnol; Peter Donnelly; Fernando Riveros-Mckay; Michael E Weale; Rachel Moore; Saskia Selzam; Eva Krapohl; R Michael Sivley; William A Tarran; Peter Sørensen; Alexander S Lachapelle; Jonathan A Griffiths; Ayden Saffari; John Deanfield; Chris C A Spencer; Julia Hippisley-Cox; David J Hunter; Jack W O'Sullivan; Euan A Ashley
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2021-03-02

8.  Genomic Strategies Toward Identification of Novel Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Thorsten Kessler; Heribert Schunkert
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022

Review 9.  How Do We Incorporate Polygenic Risk Scores in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Management?

Authors:  Trevor D Hadley; Ali M Agha; Christie M Ballantyne
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 10.  PCSK9 Biology and Its Role in Atherothrombosis.

Authors:  Cristina Barale; Elena Melchionda; Alessandro Morotti; Isabella Russo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.