Literature DB >> 31707071

Cooking without thinking: How understanding cooking as a practice can shed new light on inequalities in healthy eating.

Rosa van Kesteren1, Adrian Evans2.   

Abstract

In the UK the way we eat has become the biggest cause of preventable illness and death, placing a huge burden on our health system. Studies have found this is particularly true for those in more deprived areas. In the context of cheap ultra-processed foods, public health interventions to reduce this healthy eating gap often promote cooking 'from scratch' as a means of making increased fruit and vegetable consumption affordable on a tight budget. However the effectiveness of such healthy cooking interventions is debated. This research sought to address this problem by using practice theory to highlight previously overlooked non-cognitive factors involved in everyday cooking performances and consider how they might affect inequalities in healthy eating. Our findings are based on in-depth qualitative research with 25 mothers (including interviews and cooking observations) and a quantitative survey of 310 respondents. In the first section we build the case that cooking is better understood as a practice by outlining the different non-cognitive elements involved in mundane performances of cooking at home (focusing on materials, meanings and competencies). In the second section we focus on the complex relationships between social deprivation, diet and cooking practices, exploring the underexamined links between macro-scale social inequalities and the more micro-scale repeated performances of everyday activities. More specifically we show how social deprivation can impact upon the materials, meanings and competencies of cooking practices in ways that severely limit the capacity for those in more deprived areas to frequently cook with healthier unprocessed ingredients. Finally, we contend that by viewing cooking as a practice and by designing interventions based on this foundation it would be possible to achieve significant benefits to public health.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31707071     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  2 in total

1.  "Even We Are Confused": A Thematic Analysis of Professionals' Perceptions of Processed Foods and Challenges for Communication.

Authors:  Christina R Sadler; Terri Grassby; Kathryn Hart; Monique M Raats; Milka Sokolović; Lada Timotijevic
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 2.  Definitions and Assessment Methods of 'Home Cooking' in Studies with Dietary Variables: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Yuan; Aya Fujiwara; Mai Matsumoto; Ryoko Tajima; Chisa Shinsugi; Emiko Koshida; Hidemi Takimoto
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.706

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.