Ana C De Roo1, Joceline V Vu2, Scott E Regenbogen3. 1. Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: aderoo@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both enhanced recovery and anesthesia literature recommend multimodal perioperative analgesia to hasten recovery, prevent adverse events, and reduce opioid use after surgery. However, adherence to, and outcomes of, these recommendations are unknown. We sought to characterize use of multimodal analgesia and its association with length of stay after colectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within a statewide, 72-hospital collaborative quality initiative, we evaluated postoperative analgesia regimens among adult patients undergoing elective colectomy between 2012 and 2015. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the use of multimodal analgesia and performed multivariable linear regression to evaluate its association with postoperative length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Among 7265 patients who underwent elective colectomy in the study period, 4660 (64.1%) received multimodal analgesia, 2405 (33.1%) received opioids alone, and 200 (2.8%) received one nonopioid pain medication alone. Multimodal analgesia was independently associated with shorter adjusted postoperative LOS, compared with opioids alone (5.60 d [95% CI 5.38-5.81] versus 5.96 d [5.68-6.24], P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia is associated with shorter LOS, yet one-third of patients statewide received opioids alone after colectomy. As surgeons increasingly focus on our role in the opioid crisis, particularly in postdischarge opioid prescribing, we must also focus on inpatient postoperative pain management to limit opioid exposure. At the hospital level, this may have the added benefit of decreasing LOS and hastening recovery.
BACKGROUND: Both enhanced recovery and anesthesia literature recommend multimodal perioperative analgesia to hasten recovery, prevent adverse events, and reduce opioid use after surgery. However, adherence to, and outcomes of, these recommendations are unknown. We sought to characterize use of multimodal analgesia and its association with length of stay after colectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within a statewide, 72-hospital collaborative quality initiative, we evaluated postoperative analgesia regimens among adult patients undergoing elective colectomy between 2012 and 2015. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the use of multimodal analgesia and performed multivariable linear regression to evaluate its association with postoperative length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Among 7265 patients who underwent elective colectomy in the study period, 4660 (64.1%) received multimodal analgesia, 2405 (33.1%) received opioids alone, and 200 (2.8%) received one nonopioid pain medication alone. Multimodal analgesia was independently associated with shorter adjusted postoperative LOS, compared with opioids alone (5.60 d [95% CI 5.38-5.81] versus 5.96 d [5.68-6.24], P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia is associated with shorter LOS, yet one-third of patients statewide received opioids alone after colectomy. As surgeons increasingly focus on our role in the opioid crisis, particularly in postdischarge opioid prescribing, we must also focus on inpatient postoperative pain management to limit opioid exposure. At the hospital level, this may have the added benefit of decreasing LOS and hastening recovery.
Authors: Sven Muller; Marco P Zalunardo; Martin Hubner; Pierre A Clavien; Nicolas Demartines Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Krishna K Varadhan; Keith R Neal; Cornelius H C Dejong; Kenneth C H Fearon; Olle Ljungqvist; Dileep N Lobo Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Timothy E Miller; Julie K Thacker; William D White; Christopher Mantyh; John Migaly; Juying Jin; Anthony M Roche; Eric L Eisenstein; Rex Edwards; Kevin J Anstrom; Richard E Moon; Tong J Gan Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Roger Chou; Debra B Gordon; Oscar A de Leon-Casasola; Jack M Rosenberg; Stephen Bickler; Tim Brennan; Todd Carter; Carla L Cassidy; Eva Hall Chittenden; Ernest Degenhardt; Scott Griffith; Renee Manworren; Bill McCarberg; Robert Montgomery; Jamie Murphy; Melissa F Perkal; Santhanam Suresh; Kathleen Sluka; Scott Strassels; Richard Thirlby; Eugene Viscusi; Gary A Walco; Lisa Warner; Steven J Weisman; Christopher L Wu Journal: J Pain Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.820