Literature DB >> 31705273

Thermal performance responses in free-ranging elasmobranchs depend on habitat use and body size.

Karissa O Lear1,2, Nicholas M Whitney3, David L Morgan4, Lauran R Brewster4,5, Jeff M Whitty4, Gregg R Poulakis6, Rachel M Scharer6, Tristan L Guttridge5,7, Adrian C Gleiss4,8.   

Abstract

Temperature is one of the most influential drivers of physiological performance and behaviour in ectotherms, determining how these animals relate to their ecosystems and their ability to succeed in particular habitats. Here, we analysed the largest set of acceleration data compiled to date for elasmobranchs to examine the relationship between volitional activity and temperature in 252 individuals from 8 species. We calculated activation energies for the thermal performance response in each species and estimated optimum temperatures using an Arrhenius breakpoint analysis, subsequently fitting thermal performance curves to the activity data. Juveniles living in confined nursery habitats not only spent substantially more time above their optimum temperature and at the upper limits of their performance breadths compared to larger, less site-restricted animals, but also showed lower activation energies and broader performance curves. Species or life stages occupying confined habitats featured more generalist behavioural responses to temperature change, whereas wider ranging elasmobranchs were characterised by more specialist behavioural responses. The relationships between the estimated performance regimes and environmental temperature limits suggest that animals in confined habitats, including many juvenile elasmobranchs within nursery habitats, are likely to experience a reduction of performance under a warming climate, although their flatter thermal response will likely dampen this impact. The effect of warming on less site-restricted species is difficult to forecast since three of four species studied here did not reach their optimum temperature in the wild, although their specialist performance characteristics may indicate a more rapid decline should optimum temperatures be exceeded.

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Biologging; Climate change; Optimum temperature; Performance breadth; Performance curve

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31705273     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04547-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  47 in total

1.  The pace of shifting climate in marine and terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Michael T Burrows; David S Schoeman; Lauren B Buckley; Pippa Moore; Elvira S Poloczanska; Keith M Brander; Chris Brown; John F Bruno; Carlos M Duarte; Benjamin S Halpern; Johnna Holding; Carrie V Kappel; Wolfgang Kiessling; Mary I O'Connor; John M Pandolfi; Camille Parmesan; Franklin B Schwing; William J Sydeman; Anthony J Richardson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Biophysics, physiological ecology, and climate change: does mechanism matter?

Authors:  Brian Helmuth; Joel G Kingsolver; Emily Carrington
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 19.318

3.  Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude.

Authors:  Curtis A Deutsch; Joshua J Tewksbury; Raymond B Huey; Kimberly S Sheldon; Cameron K Ghalambor; David C Haak; Paul R Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The well-temperatured biologist. (American Society of Naturalists Presidential Address).

Authors:  Joel G Kingsolver
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Systematic variation in the temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits.

Authors:  Anthony I Dell; Samraat Pawar; Van M Savage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Thermal variation, thermal extremes and the physiological performance of individuals.

Authors:  W Wesley Dowd; Felicia A King; Mark W Denny
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Ontogeny influences sensitivity to climate change stressors in an endangered fish.

Authors:  L M Komoroske; R E Connon; J Lindberg; B S Cheng; G Castillo; M Hasenbein; N A Fangue
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.079

8.  Accelerometry to Estimate Energy Expenditure during Activity: Best Practice with Data Loggers.

Authors:  L G Halsey; J A Green; R P Wilson; P B Frappell
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.247

9.  Development and application of a machine learning algorithm for classification of elasmobranch behaviour from accelerometry data.

Authors:  L R Brewster; J J Dale; T L Guttridge; S H Gruber; A C Hansell; M Elliott; I G Cowx; N M Whitney; A C Gleiss
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.573

10.  From global change to a butterfly flapping: biophysics and behaviour affect tropical climate change impacts.

Authors:  Timothy C Bonebrake; Carol L Boggs; Jeannie A Stamberger; Curtis A Deutsch; Paul R Ehrlich
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  5 in total

1.  Forecasting intraspecific changes in distribution of a wide-ranging marine predator under climate change.

Authors:  Yuri Niella; Paul Butcher; Bonnie Holmes; Adam Barnett; Robert Harcourt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The distribution of manta rays in the western North Atlantic Ocean off the eastern United States.

Authors:  Nicholas A Farmer; Lance P Garrison; Calusa Horn; Margaret Miller; Timothy Gowan; Robert D Kenney; Michelle Vukovich; Julia Robinson Willmott; Jessica Pate; D Harry Webb; Timothy J Mullican; Joshua D Stewart; Kim Bassos-Hull; Christian Jones; Delaney Adams; Nicole A Pelletier; Jordan Waldron; Stephen Kajiura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Ocean warming alters the distributional range, migratory timing, and spatial protections of an apex predator, the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier).

Authors:  Neil Hammerschlag; Laura H McDonnell; Mitchell J Rider; Garrett M Street; Elliott L Hazen; Lisa J Natanson; Camilla T McCandless; Melanie R Boudreau; Austin J Gallagher; Malin L Pinsky; Ben Kirtman
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 13.211

4.  Temporal niche partitioning as a novel mechanism promoting co-existence of sympatric predators in marine systems.

Authors:  Karissa O Lear; Nicholas M Whitney; John J Morris; Adrian C Gleiss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The power struggle: assessing interacting global change stressors via experimental studies on sharks.

Authors:  Ian A Bouyoucos; Sue-Ann Watson; Serge Planes; Colin A Simpfendorfer; Gail D Schwieterman; Nicholas M Whitney; Jodie L Rummer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.