Literature DB >> 31704900

Signal-specific amplitude adjustment to noise in common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Ida M Kragh1, Katherine McHugh2, Randall S Wells2, Laela S Sayigh3,4, Vincent M Janik5, Peter L Tyack5, Frants H Jensen6,7.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic underwater noise has increased over the past century, raising concern about the impact on cetaceans that rely on sound for communication, navigation and locating prey and predators. Many terrestrial animals increase the amplitude of their acoustic signals to partially compensate for the masking effect of noise (the Lombard response), but it has been suggested that cetaceans almost fully compensate with amplitude adjustments for increasing noise levels. Here, we used sound-recording DTAGs on pairs of free-ranging common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) to test (i) whether dolphins increase signal amplitude to compensate for increasing ambient noise and (ii) whether adjustments are identical for different signal types. We present evidence of a Lombard response in the range 0.1-0.3 dB per 1 dB increase in ambient noise, which is similar to that of terrestrial animals, but much lower than the response reported for other cetaceans. We found that signature whistles tended to be louder and with a lower degree of amplitude adjustment to noise compared with non-signature whistles, suggesting that signature whistles may be selected for higher output levels and may have a smaller scope for amplitude adjustment to noise. The consequence of the limited degree of vocal amplitude compensation is a loss of active space during periods of increased noise, with potential consequences for group cohesion, conspecific encounter rates and mate attraction.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic noise; Cetacean; Communication; Lombard response; Masking; Signature whistle

Year:  2019        PMID: 31704900     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.216606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  3 in total

1.  Acoustically advertising male harbour seals in southeast Alaska do not make biologically relevant acoustic adjustments in the presence of vessel noise.

Authors:  Leanna P Matthews; Michelle E H Fournet; Christine Gabriele; Holger Klinck; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Pile driving repeatedly impacts the giant scallop (Placopecten magellanicus).

Authors:  Youenn Jézéquel; Seth Cones; Frants H Jensen; Hannah Brewer; John Collins; T Aran Mooney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Changes in whistle parameters of two common bottlenose dolphin ecotypes as a result of the physical presence of the research vessel.

Authors:  Simone Antichi; Jorge Urbán R; Sergio Martínez-Aguilar; Lorena Viloria-Gómora
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.061

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.