Literature DB >> 31704567

Affluent countries inflict inequitable mortality and economic loss on Asia via PM2.5 emissions.

Keisuke Nansai1, Susumu Tohno2, Satoru Chatani3, Keiichiro Kanemoto4, Midori Kurogi2, Yuta Fujii2, Shigemi Kagawa5, Yasushi Kondo6, Fumiya Nagashima7, Wataru Takayanagi8, Manfred Lenzen9.   

Abstract

This research sets out to quantify the mortality and economic loss in individual Asian countries caused by the PM2.5 emissions induced by the consumption of the world's five highest-consuming countries (US, China, Japan, Germany, UK). In 2010 alone, the economic impact of these five countries' consumption caused a loss of almost 45 billion US dollars due to the premature deaths of more than 1 million people in Asia, including 15 thousand children younger than 5 years old. The percentage ratio of economic loss to value-added driven by consumers via trade differed greatly among the impacted countries. For the US, the highest percentage loss was 4.1% in Laos, followed by 2.0% in Bangladesh, both markedly higher than the figures for the more developed countries, such as 0.21% for Japan and 0.18% for Korea. This reflects the inequitable value chain existing between consumer countries and impacted countries, and implies that developing countries are obtaining value-added in exchange for unintentionally increased health risks, delaying their development and potentially creating a vicious circle that hinders much-needed improvements in areas like poverty reduction and public health. This inequitable situation needs to be redressed through introduction of clean energy and other types of technological assistance to help achieve United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 7, 10 and 13. Such as move is essential if premature infant deaths are to be curtailed.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumption-based accounting; Foregone labor output; Input–output analysis; International trade; Premature mortality

Year:  2019        PMID: 31704567     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  7 in total

1.  Energy Efficiency and Health Efficiency of Old and New EU Member States.

Authors:  Yongqi Feng; Xinye Yu; Yung-Ho Chiu; Tai-Yu Lin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-06-09

2.  Observations on the particle pollution of the cities in China in the Coronavirus 2019 closure: Characteristics and lessons for environmental management.

Authors:  Hong Yao; Guangyuan Niu; Qingxiang Zhang; Qinyu Jiang; Wei Lu; Huan Liu; Tianhua Ni
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Farhan Ahmed; Imtiaz Ali; Shazia Kousar; Saira Ahmed
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  A Health Impact and Economic Loss Assessment of O3 and PM2.5 Exposure in China From 2015 to 2020.

Authors:  Xiangxue Zhang; Changxiu Cheng; Hui Zhao
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2022-03-01

5.  Critical supply chains for mitigating PM2.5 emission-related mortalities in India.

Authors:  Haruka Mitoma; Fumiya Nagashima; Shigemi Kagawa; Keisuke Nansai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Trends in global dependency on the Indonesian palm oil and resultant environmental impacts.

Authors:  Yosuke Shigetomi; Yuichi Ishimura; Yuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Consumption in the G20 nations causes particulate air pollution resulting in two million premature deaths annually.

Authors:  Keisuke Nansai; Susumu Tohno; Satoru Chatani; Keiichiro Kanemoto; Shigemi Kagawa; Yasushi Kondo; Wataru Takayanagi; Manfred Lenzen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.