Literature DB >> 31704389

Outcomes of late endovascular recanalization for symptomatic non-acute atherosclerotic intracranial large artery occlusion.

Yin-Dan Yao1, Ao-Fei Liu2, Han-Cheng Qiu2, Ji Zhou2, Chen Li2, Qi Wang2, Jin Lv3, Wei-Jian Jiang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment of symptomatic non-acute atherosclerotic intracranial large artery occlusion (ILAO) beyond 24 h from onset remains uncertain. We investigate the outcomes of late endovascular recanalization for symptomatic non-acute atherosclerotic ILAO. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2013 to July 2018, with safety as the first principle, late endovascular recanalization for symptomatic non-acute atherosclerotic ILAO beyond 24 h from onset was attempted in 32 consecutive patients. Primary safety outcome was any stroke or death within 30 days. Primary efficacy outcome were functional independence at 90 days.
RESULTS: The median time from imaging-documented occlusion to treatment was 25.5 days (interquartile range: 10.5-36.5) for all patients. Technical success in recanalization was achieved in 17 patients (53.1%, 17/32). The 30-day rate of any stroke or death was 5.9% (1/17) in the recanalized group versus 6.7% (1/15) in the failure group (P = 0.927). The rate of functional independence at 90 days (70.5%, 12/17) was increased significantly as compared with that before operation (23.5%, 4/17) in the recanalized group (P = 0.015). The rate of functional independence at 90 days (66.7%, 10/15) was not different from that before operation (66.7%,10/15) in the failure group (P = 1.00). The median score reduction in mRS from baseline at 90 days was 1.0 (interquartile range: 1.0-2.0) in the recanalized group versus 0 (interquartile range: 0.0-0.0) in the failure group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: For carefully selected patients with symptomatic non-acute atherosclerotic ILAO beyond 24 h from onset, late endovascular recanalization is technically feasible. The periprocedural safety of late endovascular recanalization is acceptable. Successful recanalization may effectively improve the degree of disability in such patients. However, it should be emphasized that revascularization of non-acute ILAO is a high risk procedure, which should only be performed by experienced operators with safety as the first principle.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerotic disease; Endovascular recanalization; Intracranial large artery occlusion; Non-acute

Year:  2019        PMID: 31704389     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  3 in total

1.  Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Nonacute Symptomatic Intracranial Carotid Artery Terminus Occlusion: Initial Experience and Follow-Up Outcome.

Authors:  Hao Yin; Jinping Zhang; Wei Zhao; Meimei Zheng; Yun Song; Lili Sun; Jun Zhang; Ju Han
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  Endovascular Recanalization of Symptomatic Nonacute Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Proposal of a New Angiographic Classification.

Authors:  F Gao; X Sun; X Guo; D Li; G D Xu; Z R Miao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Delayed Recanalization-How Late Is Not Too Late?

Authors:  Ruiqing Kang; Marcin Gamdzyk; Hong Tang; Yujie Luo; Cameron Lenahan; John H Zhang
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.800

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.