Shengli Wang1, Zhigang Cui2, Hang Li3, Juan Li4, Xiaoting Lv5, Zitai Yang6, Min Gao7, Yanhong Bi8, Ziwei Zhang9, Baosen Zhou10, Zhihua Yin11. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: Wangshengli@cmu.edu.cn. 2. School of Nursing, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: zgcui@cmu.edu.cn. 3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: lihangatcmu@126.com. 4. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: lijuan@cmu.edu.cn. 5. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: cmulxt1992@163.com. 6. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: cmuzitaiyang@163.com. 7. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: mgao@cmu.edu.cn. 8. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: cmuyhbi@126.com. 9. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: 1582467076@qq.com. 10. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: bszhou@cmu.edu.cn. 11. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, PR China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Etiology and Intervention, University of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110122, PR China. Electronic address: zhyin@cmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNA Nuclear Paraspeckle Assembly Transcript 1 (NEAT1) is a novel lncRNA localized specifically to nuclear paraspeckles. The study analyses the association between NEAT1 genetic polymorphisms and the susceptibility of lung cancer in a Chinese Northeast Population. METHODS: The NEAT1 rs512715 and rs2239895 genetic polymorphisms were genotyped in 462 lung cancer cases and 559 controls by a Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) with the TaqMan discrimination assay. RESULTS: Our study found that the polymorphisms of two SNPs increased or decreased the risk of lung cancer were not obvious, but statistical significance in non-small cell lung cancer and lung squamous cell carcinoma can be observed. Compared with homozygous CC genotype carriers, the GC genotype of rs2239895 was positively related to the risk of lung squamous cell carcinoma (OR 1.805, 95% CI, 1.168-2.789, P = 0.008). Similarly, associations between rs2239895 and lung squamous cell carcinoma risk were found (CC + GC vs. GG, OR 1.668, 95%CI, 1.093-2.545, P = 0.018) in dominant model. In stratified analysis for age, rs2239895 GC genotype was observed to increase the risk of non-small-cell lung cancer compared with CC genotype (OR 1.562, 95%CI, 1.029-2.371, P = 0.036). However, the study showed that negative correlation the lung cancer risk and rs512715 polymorphisms. There was no remarkable relationship between the both additive and multiplicative model about the two SNPs. CONCLUSIONS: The polymorphisms rs2239895 were associated with the risk of lung squamous cell carcinoma. The interaction between the two SNPs and the cigarette smoking was no notable difference.
BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNA Nuclear Paraspeckle Assembly Transcript 1 (NEAT1) is a novel lncRNA localized specifically to nuclear paraspeckles. The study analyses the association between NEAT1 genetic polymorphisms and the susceptibility of lung cancer in a Chinese Northeast Population. METHODS: The NEAT1rs512715 and rs2239895 genetic polymorphisms were genotyped in 462 lung cancer cases and 559 controls by a Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) with the TaqMan discrimination assay. RESULTS: Our study found that the polymorphisms of two SNPs increased or decreased the risk of lung cancer were not obvious, but statistical significance in non-small cell lung cancer and lung squamous cell carcinoma can be observed. Compared with homozygous CC genotype carriers, the GC genotype of rs2239895 was positively related to the risk of lung squamous cell carcinoma (OR 1.805, 95% CI, 1.168-2.789, P = 0.008). Similarly, associations between rs2239895 and lung squamous cell carcinoma risk were found (CC + GC vs. GG, OR 1.668, 95%CI, 1.093-2.545, P = 0.018) in dominant model. In stratified analysis for age, rs2239895GC genotype was observed to increase the risk of non-small-cell lung cancer compared with CC genotype (OR 1.562, 95%CI, 1.029-2.371, P = 0.036). However, the study showed that negative correlation the lung cancer risk and rs512715 polymorphisms. There was no remarkable relationship between the both additive and multiplicative model about the two SNPs. CONCLUSIONS: The polymorphisms rs2239895 were associated with the risk of lung squamous cell carcinoma. The interaction between the two SNPs and the cigarette smoking was no notable difference.
Authors: Mikhlid H Almutairi; Bader O Almutairi; Turki M Alrubie; Sultan N Alharbi; Narasimha R Parine; Abdulwahed F Alrefaei; Ibrahim Aldeailej; Abdullah Alamri; Abdelhabib Semlali Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240