| Literature DB >> 31703745 |
Esmée M Bijnens1,2, Catherine Derom3,4, Steven Weyers3, Bram G Janssen5, Evert Thiery6, Tim S Nawrot5,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Developmental processes in the placenta and the fetal brain are shaped by the similar biological signals. Evidence accumulates that adaptive responses of the placenta may influence central nervous system development. We hypothesize that placental mtDNA content at birth is associated with intelligence in childhood. In addition, we investigate if intra-pair differences in mtDNA content are associated with intra-pair differences in intelligence.Entities:
Keywords: Childhood; DOHaD; Intelligence; Mitochondrial DNA content; Placenta; Twins
Year: 2019 PMID: 31703745 PMCID: PMC6839247 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-2105-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Study population characteristics
| Education | |
| Low | 16 (8.0) |
| Middle | 71 (35.3) |
| High | 114 (56.7) |
| Neighbourhood income, euro | 18,483 ± 2474 |
| Smoking during pregnancy | 16 (8.0) |
| Cigarettes/day during pregnancy | 1.5 ± 3.7 |
| Urban environment within 5 km, % | 32 ± 12 |
| Birth weight (g) | 2525 ± 514 |
| Gestational age, weeks | 36.8 ± 2.3 |
| Birth year | 1986 ± 2.5 |
| Sex | |
| Male–male | 143 (38.1) |
| Female–female | 131 (34.9) |
| Male–female | 101 (26.9) |
| Zygosity–chorionicity | |
| Dizygotic-dichorionic | 212 (56.5) |
| Monozygotic-dichorionic | 73 (19.5) |
| Monozygotic-monochorionic | 90 (24.0) |
| Twins in final study | |
| Twin with 1 individual in study | 27 (7.0) |
| Twin with 2 individuals in study | 348 (93.0) |
| Age | 11.5 ± 1.6 |
| Intelligence score (IQ) | |
| Total IQ | 106.0 ± 15.1 |
| Verbal | 106.6 ± 14.6 |
| Performance | 103.9 ± 15.3 |
Data presented are mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage)
Relative placental mtDNA content according to the different zygosity–chorionicity groups
| Relative placental mtDNA content | Mean | Standard deviation | p-value (compared to MZMC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dizygotic-dichorionic | 1.13 | 0.55 | 0.03 |
| Monozygotic-dichorionic | 1.13 | 0.51 | 0.05 |
| Monozygotic-monochorionic | 0.98 | 0.47 | – |
Covariates in association with a change in intelligence quotient
| Covariates | Multi variable model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Change in IQ | 95% CI | ||
| Girls | − 2.57 | − 5.32 to 0.17 | 0.07 |
| Birth weight, + IQR | 1.81 | − 0.36 to 3.98 | 0.10 |
| Gestational age, + IQR | 0.17 | − 1.67 to 2.00 | 0.86 |
| Birth year, + 1 year | − 1.99 | − 3.03 to − 0.96 | 0.0002 |
| Peripheral cord insertion | 1.31 | − 1.39 to 4.00 | 0.34 |
| Age at measurement, + 1 year | − 1.50 | − 3.06 to 0.06 | 0.06 |
| High parental educational level | 6.99 | 4.19 to 9.79 | < 0.0001 |
| Neigbourhood household income, + IQR | − 0.42 | − 2.10 to 1.25 | 0.62 |
| Maternal smoking during pregnancy | − 1.46 | − 6.21 to 3.29 | 0.55 |
| Urban environment, + IQR | 2.40 | − 0.03 to 4.83 | 0.05 |
| Girls | − 3.52 | − 6.24 to − 0.79 | 0.01 |
| Birth weight, + IQR | 1.78 | − 0.37 to 3.94 | 0.11 |
| Gestational age, + IQR | − 0.13 | − 1.88 to 1.62 | 0.88 |
| Birth year, + 1 year | − 2.21 | − 3.15 to − 1.26 | < 0.0001 |
| Peripheral cord insertion | 0.87 | − 1.79 to 3.54 | 0.52 |
| Age at measurement, + 1 year | − 1.83 | − 3.26 to − 0.40 | 0.01 |
| High parental educational level | 6.76 | 4.14 to 9.38 | < 0.0001 |
| Neigbourhood household income, + IQR | − 0.98 | − 2.55 to 0.58 | 0.22 |
| Maternal smoking during pregnancy | − 2.29 | − 6.73 to 2.14 | 0.31 |
| Urban environment, + IQR | 1.54 | − 0.77 to 3.84 | 0.19 |
| Girls | − 1.50 | − 4.48 to 1.47 | 0.32 |
| Birth weight, + IQR | 0.99 | − 1.31 to 3.28 | 0.40 |
| Gestational age, +IQR | 0.51 | − 1.41 to 2.43 | 0.60 |
| Birth year, + 1 year | − 1.18 | − 2.27 to − 0.09 | 0.03 |
| Peripheral cord insertion | 0.56 | − 2.28 to 3.39 | 0.70 |
| Age at measurement, + 1 year | − 0.71 | − 2.35 to 0.93 | 0.40 |
| High parental educational level | 5.57 | 2.65 to 8.49 | 0.0003 |
| Neigbourhood household income, + IQR | 0.14 | − 1.61 to 1.88 | 0.88 |
| Maternal smoking during pregnancy | − 0.09 | − 5.04 to 4.86 | 0.91 |
| Urban environment, + IQR | 2.59 | 0.08 to 5.11 | 0.05 |
CI confidence interval, IQR interquartile range
Estimated change in intelligence quotient (IQ) for a doubling in mitochondrial DNA content
| Intelligence quotient (IQ) | Change in IQ | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1.98 | 0.02 to 3.93 | 0.05 |
| Verbal | 1.42 | − 0.51 to 3.34 | 0.15 |
| Performance | 2.29 | 0.21 to 4.37 | 0.03 |
Adjusted for sex, gestational age, birth weight, birth year, zygosity and chorionicity, cord insertion, age at IQ measurement, indicators of socioeconomic status (parental education and neighbourhood household income), smoking during pregnancy and urban environment
CI confidence interval
Fig. 1Correlation between intra-pair difference in mitochondrial DNA content in placental tissue and intra-pair differences in total, verbal and performance IQ in dizygotic (n = 102), monozygotic-dichorionic (n = 34) and monozygotic-monochorionic twin pairs (n = 38)
Estimated change in behaviour problems (CBCL T score) for a doubling in mitochondrial DNA content
| Behaviour problems | Change in CBCL T score | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Externalizing | 0.07 | − 1.36 to 1.51 | 0.92 |
| Internalizing | − 0.43 | − 1.95 to 1.08 | 0.58 |
| Total | − 0.60 | − 2.02 to 0.81 | 0.40 |
Adjusted for sex, gestational age, birth weight, birth year, zygosity and chorionicity, cord insertion, age at IQ measurement, indicators of socioeconomic status (parental education and neighbourhood household income), smoking during pregnancy and urban environment
CI confidence interval