| Literature DB >> 31703626 |
Jyotirmoy Halder1, Jinfeng Zhang1, Shaukat Ali1, Jagdeep S Sidhu1, Harsimardeep S Gill1, Shyamal K Talukder2, Jonathan Kleinjan1, Brent Turnipseed1, Sunish K Sehgal3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the late 1920s, A. E. Watkins collected about 7000 landrace cultivars (LCs) of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from 32 different countries around the world. Among which 826 LCs remain viable and could be a valuable source of superior/favorable alleles to enhance disease resistance in wheat. In the present study, a core set of 121 LCs, which captures the majority of the genetic diversity of Watkins collection, was evaluated for identifying novel sources of resistance against tan spot, Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB), and Fusarium Head Blight (FHB).Entities:
Keywords: Biotic stress; Disease resistance; Fusarium head blight; Genome-wide association study; QTL; Stagonospora nodorum blotch; Tan spot; Watkins landrace cultivars
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31703626 PMCID: PMC6839225 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-2093-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Watkins LCs found resistant/moderately resistant to leaf spot diseases and FHB
| Accession No. | Country of origin | Tan spot | Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB) | Fusarium head blight (FHB) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ptr race 1 | Ptr race 5 | |||||||||
| Reaction typea (Lesion type) | Ptr ToxA reaction | Reaction typea (Lesion type) | Ptr ToxB reaction | Reaction typea (Lesion type) | Accession No. | Country of origin | Reaction typeb (Disease Index) | Percent spikelet severity (PSS) | ||
| 1190007 | Australia | MR (2.28) | Insensitive | MR (1.56) | Insensitive | R (1.5) | 1190032 | India | MR (22.8) | 10.2 |
| 1190042 | France | MR (1.56) | Sensitive | R (1.22) | Insensitive | MR (1.67) | 1190308 | Iran | MR (23.0) | 8.6 |
| 1190103 | Italy | R (1.44) | Sensitive | R (1.0) | Insensitive | MR (2.61) | 1190551 | Spain | MR (23.75) | 9.6 |
| 1190126 | India | MR (2.28) | Insensitive | R (1.0) | Insensitive | MR (2.5) | 1190662 | Romania | MR (25.18) | 9.6 |
| 1190160 | Spain | MR (1.78) | Sensitive | R (1.44) | Insensitive | MR (1.56) | 1190788 | Turkestan | MR (25.35) | 9.2 |
| 1190273 | Spain | MR (2.0) | Insensitive | R (1.0) | Insensitive | MR (2.44) | – | – | – | – |
| 1190292 | Cyprus | MR (1.89) | Sensitive | R (1.11) | Insensitive | MR (1.72) | – | – | – | – |
| 1190397 | Portugal | MR (1.56) | Insensitive | R (1.17) | Insensitive | MR (2.56) | – | – | – | – |
| 1190398 | Palestine | MR (1.72) | Insensitive | R (1.22) | Insensitive | MR (2.94) | – | – | – | – |
| 1190662 | Romania | MR (2.56) | Insensitive | MR (2.0) | Insensitive | MR (2.0) | – | – | – | – |
| 1190698 | China | MR (1.83) | Insensitive | MR (1.61) | Insensitive | MR (2.17) | – | – | – | – |
| 1190740 | USSR | MR (1.67) | Insensitive | R (1.44) | Insensitive | MR (2.22) | – | – | – | – |
| 1190912 | Hungary | R (1.39) | Sensitive | R (1.33) | Insensitive | R (1.17) | – | – | – | – |
| Salamouni | 1 | 1 | 1 | Lyman | 15.25 | – | ||||
| 6B662 | – | 4.3 | – | Overley | 50 | 34.6 | ||||
| Glenlea | 4.56 | – | 4 | Emerson | – | 9.1 | ||||
| Mean | 3.6 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 34.1 | ||||||
| CV (%)c | 12.7 | 19.4 | 14.3 | 14.7 | ||||||
| LSDd | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 9.9 | ||||||
| Range | 1.3–4.4 | 1.1–4.0 | 1.3–4.0 | 17.4–56.7 | ||||||
aTan spot Ptr race 1 and race 5 and stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB) disease reaction scoring from 1 to 5. bFusarium head blight (FHB) reaction type based on disease index in field experiments. cCV Coefficient of variation dLSD Least significant difference
Fig. 1Bar graph showing the response of Watkins landrace cultivars (LCs) against Fusarium head blight (FHB), Tan spot Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr) race 1 (R1) and race 5 (R5) and Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB) evaluation. The X-axis representing the type of diseases and the Y-axis showing the number of LCs found resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, and susceptible in the evaluation. Values on the bar represent number of LCs
Fig. 2Reaction of Watkins core set of landrace cultivars (LCs) to tan spot (Ptr race 1), Ptr ToxA and Ptr race 5, and Ptr ToxB respectively. R- resistant; S- susceptible; In- insensitive to Ptr ToxA or ToxB; Sen- sensitive to Ptr ToxA or ToxB
Fig. 3Response reaction of Watkins landrace cultivars (LCs) against Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Ptr race 5) and corresponding toxin (Ptr ToxB) at the seeding stage in greenhouse. a Ptr ToxB reaction in 6B662 (susceptible check); b Ptr race 5 reaction in 6B662 (susceptible check); c Insensitive reaction of Acc.1190305 to Ptr ToxB; d Acc.1190305 showing susceptibility to race 5; e Acc.1190352 representing sensitivity to Ptr ToxB; f Acc.1190352 representing resistance to race 5; g Ptr ToxB reaction in Salamouni (resistant check), and h Ptr race 5 reaction in Salamouni (resistant check)
Fig. 4Genome-wide association scan. Mixed linear model (MLM) based Manhattan plots represent–log10 (p-value) for SNPs distributed across all 21 chromosomes of wheat. a Pyrenophora tritici-repentis race 1 (Ptr race 1); b Pyrenophora tritici-repentis race 5 (Ptr race 5); c Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB). Y-axis:–log10 (p-value) and x-axis: wheat chromosomes. The horizontal lines stand as a threshold for significant markers with–log10 (p-value) of > 3 which corresponds to a p-value < 1 × 10− 3. On the right side of each model, Quantile-Quantile (QQ) plots represent the expected null distribution of p-values vs observed p-values
Significant associations between single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and Watkins LCs response to two major leaf spot diseases (tan spot Ptr race 1, race 5, and SNB)
| Trait | QTLs (SNP markers) | Allele | Chr | Genetic position (cMa) | Physical position (Mbp) | R 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTR1 | C/T | 1AL | 182.2 | 536.43 | 0.0004 | 0.16 | |
| C/T | 1AL | 267.2 | 589.02 | 0.0009 | 0.14 | ||
| A/T | 2BS | 3.1 | 6.31 | 0.0001 | 0.18 | ||
| C/T | 3AS | 1.9 | 20.00 | 0.0010 | 0.14 | ||
| G/T | 3BL | 202.7 | 798.55 | 0.0005 | 0.16 | ||
| C/T | 4AL | 107.3 | 543.74 | 0.0008 | 0.15 | ||
| C/G | 4BS | -* | 4.99 | 0.0005 | 0.16 | ||
| A/G | 5AL | 373.0 | 671.39 | 0.0003 | 0.16 | ||
| A/C | 5BS | 15.7 | 13.43 | 0.0005 | 0.16 | ||
| C/T | 5BL | 166.7 | 568.82 | 0.0010 | 0.14 | ||
| PTR5 | C/T | 1BL | 50.4 | 352.39 | 0.0004 | 0.19 | |
| G/T | 2DL | 216.1 | 413.78 | 0.0004 | 0.19 | ||
| A/G | 3AL | 198.2 | 719.76 | 0.0009 | 0.17 | ||
| G/T | 5BL | 55.3 | 314.30 | 0.0002 | 0.20 | ||
| C/G | 6BL | 165.2 | 678.74 | 0.0007 | 0.18 | ||
| SNB | A/G | 2BS | 89.1 | 238.50 | 0.0008 | 0.20 | |
| C/T | 5AL | 116.6 | 472.34 | 0.0004 | 0.21 | ||
| G/T | 5BL | 210.8 | 638.83 | 0.0002 | 0.22 | ||
| C/T | 5BL | 243.0 | 679.13 | 0.0005 | 0.21 | ||
| C/T | 7AS | 29.9 | 53.26 | 0.0002 | 0.23 |
a The cM position is based on individual genetic maps (Allen et al. 2017) * No genetic position is available