| Literature DB >> 31703474 |
Yongbao Zhang1, Xiang Wu1, Jingqi Gao1, Jianwu Chen2, Xun Xv3.
Abstract
Ergonomics research strives to make workers' labor more efficient, safer, and more comfortable. Therefore, six digital humans and welding torch model were built and evaluated based on the Jack software in order to improve the ergonomics of welders' standing postures. Three sets of standing welding actions were designed: walking, raising arm, and contracting arm. Through the Lower Back Analysis, Ovako Working Posture Analysis, Comfort Assessment, and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment, this paper evaluated the optimum range of the weight of the welding torch, the upper limb posture, and the neck posture of the welder. Firstly, the results show that Chinese welders should not use a welding torch with a weight of more than 6 kg when standing up. Secondly, for adult males in the 5th, 50th, 95th percentile of body size, the best operating distance is 321 mm, 371 mm, and 421 mm, respectively, and the best operating height is 1050 mm, 1100 mm, and 1150 mm, respectively; for females in the same percentiles, the optimal operating distance is 271 mm, 321 mm, and 371 mm, respectively, and the optimal operating height is 1000 mm, 1050 mm, and 1100 mm, respectively. Moreover, the horizontal and vertical rotation angle of the welder's neck should not exceed 15° and 8.7°. The adjustment strategy not only has a positive effect on improving welders' operational posture and preventing fatigue and injury to the welder, but it also develops research ideas for promoting safety from the perspective of ergonomics.Entities:
Keywords: Jack software; adjustment strategy; ergonomics; welders’ standing posture
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31703474 PMCID: PMC6888345 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Chinese localized welder body size parameters.
| Dimension Name | Gender | Average Value | Standard Deviation | 5th | 50th | 95th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height/cm | M | 168.7 | 5.6 | 159.5 | 168.7 | 177.9 |
| F | 156.3 | 4.9 | 148.2 | 156.3 | 164.4 | |
| Weight/kg | M | 67.3 | 8.6 | 53.1 | 67.3 | 81.5 |
| F | 53.8 | 7.1 | 42.0 | 53.8 | 65.5 | |
| Maximum shoulder width/cm | M | 45.4 | 3.4 | 39.7 | 45.4 | 51.0 |
| F | 41.2 | 2.3 | 37.4 | 41.2 | 45.1 | |
| Sitting shoulder height/cm | M | 33.4 | 1.8 | 30.5 | 33.4 | 36.3 |
| F | 30.7 | 1.7 | 28.0 | 30.7 | 33.4 | |
| Sitting elbow height/cm | M | 26.3 | 2.4 | 22.3 | 26.3 | 30.2 |
| F | 25.4 | 2.3 | 21.6 | 25.4 | 29.2 | |
| Sitting deep/cm | M | 42.4 | 2.6 | 38.2 | 42.4 | 46.6 |
| F | 38.4 | 2.3 | 34.5 | 38.4 | 42.2 | |
| Sitting eye height/cm | M | 78.6 | 2.9 | 73.7 | 78.6 | 83.4 |
| F | 73.2 | 2.8 | 68.6 | 73.2 | 77.8 | |
| Sitting knee height/cm | M | 51.6 | 2.7 | 47.2 | 51.6 | 56.0 |
| F | 46.7 | 2.1 | 43.3 | 46.7 | 50.1 |
Figure 1Three-dimensional (3D) model of the welding torch. (a) CAD welding torch model. (b) Jack torch model.
Arm (hand) function radius of rotation range.
| Gender | 5th | 50th | 95th |
|---|---|---|---|
| M | 321–610 mm | 371–660 mm | 421–710 mm |
| F | 271–560 mm | 321–610 mm | 371–660 mm |
Comfort operating area height interval.
| Gender | 5th | 50th | 95th |
|---|---|---|---|
| M | 1050–1400 mm | 1100–1450 mm | 1150–1500 mm |
| F | 1000–1350 mm | 1050–1400 mm | 1100–1450 mm |
Figure 2Emission particle and cone window.
Figure 3Lower back assessment of different welding torch weights.
Right body comfort value results (hand-held 6kg welding torch).
| Body Parts | M5th | M50th | M95th | F5th | F50th | F95th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm right flexion | 0.22 | 0.54 | 1.17 | 0.52 | 0.92 | 1.34 |
| Right elbow | 0.37 | 0.48 | 1.22 | 0.21 | 0.51 | 1.52 |
| Right torso and thigh | 3.14 | 3.14 | 3.46 | 3.07 | 3.24 | 3.18 |
| Right knee | 2.52 | 2.51 | 2.52 | 2.23 | 2.23 | 2.23 |
| Right foot, calf | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 1.33 | 1.14 | 1.08 |
Figure 4Lower back pressure at different operating distances for the standing raising arm action.
Figure 5Lower back pressure at different operating distances for the standing contracting arm action.
Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) scores for different operating distances.
| Operating Distance/mm | Male RULA Score | Female RULA Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th | 50th | 95th | 5th | 50th | 95th | |
| 271.0 | - | - | - | 3 | - | - |
| 328.8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 386.6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 444.4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 502.2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 560.0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 610.0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | - | 4 | 4 |
| 660.0 | - | 4 | 4 | - | - | 4 |
| 710.0 | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
Figure 6Lower back pressure of the welding torch at different heights from the ground.
RULA scores for different heights of welding torch from the ground.
| Height/mm | Male RULA Score | Female RULA Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th | 50th | 95th | 5th | 50th | 95th | |
| 1000 | - | - | - | 3 | - | - |
| 1070 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1140 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1210 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1280 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 1350 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 1400 | 4 | 4 | 4 | - | 4 | 4 |
| 1450 | - | 4 | 4 | - | - | 4 |
| 1500 | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
Figure 7Comfort value changes with the angle of vertical deflection of the neck joint.