| Literature DB >> 31703260 |
Peizhen Li1, Lingtao Meng1, Shenghai Wang1, Kunlun Wang1, Qingxuan Sui1, Lingyu Liu1, Yuying Zhang1, Xiaotian Yin1, Qingxia Zhang1, Li Wang1.
Abstract
In previous studies, Ti-based bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) free from Ni and Be were developed as promising biomaterials. Corresponding amorphous coatings might have low elastic modulus, remarkable wear resistance, good corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. However, the amorphous coatings obtained by the common methods (high velocity oxygen fuel, laser cladding, etc.) have cracks, micro-pores, and unfused particles. In this work, a Ti-based Ti47Cu38Zr7.5Fe2.5Sn2Si1Nb2 amorphous coating with a maximum thickness of about 100 μm was obtained by laser surface remelting (LSR). The in-situ formation makes the coating dense and strongly bonded. It exhibited better corrosion resistance than the matrix and its corrosion mechanism was discussed. The effects of LSR on the microstructural evolution of Ti-based prefabricated alloy sheets were investigated. The nano-hardness in the heat affected zone (HAZ) was markedly increased by 51%, meanwhile the elastic modulus of the amorphous coating was decreased by 18%. This demonstrated that LSR could be an effective method to manufacture the high-quality amorphous coating. The in-situ amorphous coating free from Ni and Be had a low modulus, which might be a potential corrosion-resistant biomaterial.Entities:
Keywords: Ti-based alloy; in situ amorphous coating; laser surface remelting
Year: 2019 PMID: 31703260 PMCID: PMC6888445 DOI: 10.3390/ma12223660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) The plate samples disposed by different laser powers; (b) Scheme of the laser surface remelting.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of samples with (a) 2 mm treated under different laser powers; (b) 1.5 mm and 1 mm treated under different powers.
Figure 3Back-scattered scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the (a) cross-section of the 2 mm Ti alloy untreated; (b) the 2 mm sample under 200 W and the Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) corresponding to point 1; (c) Heat affected zone (HAZ); and (d) matrix regions in the sample with 2 mm under 200 W at high magnification and the EDX of point 2; (e) the 1.5 mm sample under 160 W with the inset showing untreated; (f) SEM-EDX mapping of dendritic crystals in sample with 2 mm under 200 W.
Figure 4(a) Load–displacement curve in different regions of the 1.5 mm sample by 200 W; (b) Effective elastic modulus in the different regions near the surface of the 2 mm sample by 200 W.
Nano-hardness and elastic modulus in the different zones of the 1.5 mm sample by 200 W.
| Test Parameters | HAZ | Matrix | AC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum load (Pmax, mN) | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Indenter’s Poisson’s ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Indenter’s elastic modulus (GPa) | 1141 | 1141 | 1141 |
| Contact depth (hc, nm) | 231.93 | 288.88 | 279.59 |
| Contact area (A, nm2) | 1,244,136.48 | 1,878,274.12 | 1,763,841.78 |
| Contact stiffness (S, mN/nm) | 0.1763 | 0.2143 | 0.1753 |
| Nano-hardness (H, GPa) | 12.083 | 7.9951 | 8.5144 |
| Effective Elastic modulus (E*, GPa) | 153.59 | 151.78 | 125.55 |
Figure 5Anodic polarization curves and corrosion current density for the samples with a thickness of 2 mm deposited under different laser powers in a 3.5% NaCl solution.