Literature DB >> 31703239

Grayscale Ultrasound Radiomic Features and Shear-Wave Elastography Radiomic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.

Ji Hyun Youk1, Jin Young Kwak1, Eunjung Lee2, Eun Ju Son1, Jeong-Ah Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify and compare diagnostic performance of radiomic features between grayscale ultrasound (US) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) in breast masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected 328 pathologically confirmed breast masses in 296 women who underwent grayscale US and SWE before biopsy or surgery. A representative SWE image of the mass displayed with a grayscale image in split-screen mode was selected. An ROI was delineated around the mass boundary on the grayscale image and copied and pasted to the SWE image by a dedicated breast radiologist for lesion segmentation. A total of 730 candidate radiomic features including first-order statistics and textural and wavelet features were extracted from each image. LASSO regression was used for data dimension reduction and feature selection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent radiomic features, differentiating between benign and malignant masses with calculation of the AUC.
RESULTS: Of 328 breast masses, 205 (62.5 %) were benign and 123 (37.5 %) were malignant. Following radiomic feature selection, 22 features from grayscale and 6 features from SWE remained. On univariate analysis, all 6 SWE radiomic features (P < 0.0001) and 21 of 22 grayscale radiomic features (P < 0.03) were significantly different between benign and malignant masses. After multivariate analysis, three grayscale radiomic features and two SWE radiomic features were independently associated with malignant breast masses. The AUC was 0.929 for grayscale US and 0.992 for SWE (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: US radiomic features may have the potential to improve diagnostic performance for breast masses, but further investigation of independent and larger datasets is needed. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31703239     DOI: 10.1055/a-0917-6825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Analysis for Preoperatively Predicting Different Histopathological Subtypes of Primary Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Yuting Peng; Peng Lin; Linyong Wu; Da Wan; Yujia Zhao; Li Liang; Xiaoyu Ma; Hui Qin; Yichen Liu; Xin Li; Xinrong Wang; Yun He; Hong Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Analysis for Predicting Disease-Free Survival of Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lang Xiong; Haolin Chen; Xiaofeng Tang; Biyun Chen; Xinhua Jiang; Lizhi Liu; Yanqiu Feng; Longzhong Liu; Li Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Shear Wave Elastography-Assisted Ultrasound Breast Image Analysis and Identification of Abnormal Data.

Authors:  Caoxin Yan; Zhiyan Luo; Zimei Lin; Huilin He; Yunkai Luo; Jian Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  RGB Three-Channel SWE-Based Ultrasomics Model: Improving the Efficiency in Differentiating Focal Liver Lesions.

Authors:  Mei-Qing Cheng; Meng-Fei Xian; Wen-Shuo Tian; Ming-De Li; Hang-Tong Hu; Wei Li; Jian-Chao Zhang; Yang Huang; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Ming Kuang; Wei Wang; Si-Min Ruan; Li-Da Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Combination of shear wave elastography and BI-RADS in identification of solid breast masses.

Authors:  Xue Zheng; Fei Li; Zhi-Dong Xuan; Yu Wang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Ultrasound-based radiomics for predicting different pathological subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer before surgery.

Authors:  Zhi-Ping Tang; Zhen Ma; Yan Ma; Hong Yang; Yun He; Ruo-Chuan Liu; Bin-Bin Jin; Dong-Yue Wen; Rong Wen; Hai-Hui Yin; Cheng-Cheng Qiu; Rui-Zhi Gao
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.795

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.