Charlotte Z Woods-Hill1,2, Danielle W Koontz3, Anne F King3, Annie Voskertchian3, Elizabeth A Colantuoni4, Marlene R Miller5,6,7, James C Fackler8, Christopher P Bonafide9, Aaron M Milstone3, Anping Xie8,10. 1. Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 2. The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 5. Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH. 6. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH. 7. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 8. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 9. Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 10. Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Sending blood cultures in children at low risk of bacteremia can contribute to a cascade of unnecessary antibiotic exposure, adverse effects, and increased costs. We aimed to describe practice variation, clinician beliefs, and attitudes about blood culture testing in critically ill children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Fifteen PICUs enrolled in the Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children collaborative, an investigation of blood culture use in critically ill children in the United States. SUBJECTS: PICU clinicians (bedside nurses, resident physicians, fellow physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and attending physicians). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Survey items explored typical blood culture practices, attitudes and beliefs about cultures, and potential barriers to changing culture use in a PICU setting. Fifteen of 15 sites participated, with 347 total responses, 15-45 responses per site, and an overall median response rate of 57%. We summarized median proportions and interquartile ranges of respondents who reported certain practices or beliefs: 86% (73-91%) report that cultures are ordered reflexively; 71% (61-77%) do not examine patients before ordering cultures; 90% (86-94%) obtain cultures for any new fever in PICU patients; 33% (19-61%) do not obtain peripheral cultures when an indwelling catheter is in place; and 64% (36-81%) sample multiple (vs single) lumens of central venous catheters for new fever. When asked about barriers to reducing unnecessary cultures, 80% (73-90%) noted fear of missing sepsis. Certain practices (culture source and indication) varied by clinician type. Obtaining surveillance cultures and routinely culturing all possible sources (each lumen of indwelling catheters and peripheral specimens) are positively correlated with baseline blood culture rates. CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in blood culture practices in the PICU. Fear and reflexive habits are common drivers of cultures. These practices may contribute to over-testing for bacteremia. Further investigation of how to optimize blood culture use is warranted.
OBJECTIVES: Sending blood cultures in children at low risk of bacteremia can contribute to a cascade of unnecessary antibiotic exposure, adverse effects, and increased costs. We aimed to describe practice variation, clinician beliefs, and attitudes about blood culture testing in critically illchildren. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Fifteen PICUs enrolled in the Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically IllChildren collaborative, an investigation of blood culture use in critically illchildren in the United States. SUBJECTS: PICU clinicians (bedside nurses, resident physicians, fellow physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and attending physicians). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Survey items explored typical blood culture practices, attitudes and beliefs about cultures, and potential barriers to changing culture use in a PICU setting. Fifteen of 15 sites participated, with 347 total responses, 15-45 responses per site, and an overall median response rate of 57%. We summarized median proportions and interquartile ranges of respondents who reported certain practices or beliefs: 86% (73-91%) report that cultures are ordered reflexively; 71% (61-77%) do not examine patients before ordering cultures; 90% (86-94%) obtain cultures for any new fever in PICU patients; 33% (19-61%) do not obtain peripheral cultures when an indwelling catheter is in place; and 64% (36-81%) sample multiple (vs single) lumens of central venous catheters for new fever. When asked about barriers to reducing unnecessary cultures, 80% (73-90%) noted fear of missing sepsis. Certain practices (culture source and indication) varied by clinician type. Obtaining surveillance cultures and routinely culturing all possible sources (each lumen of indwelling catheters and peripheral specimens) are positively correlated with baseline blood culture rates. CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in blood culture practices in the PICU. Fear and reflexive habits are common drivers of cultures. These practices may contribute to over-testing for bacteremia. Further investigation of how to optimize blood culture use is warranted.
Authors: Scott L Weiss; Julie C Fitzgerald; Fran Balamuth; Elizabeth R Alpern; Jane Lavelle; Marianne Chilutti; Robert Grundmeier; Vinay M Nadkarni; Neal J Thomas Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Richard J Holden; Pascale Carayon; Ayse P Gurses; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; A Ant Ozok; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Charlotte Z Woods-Hill; Laura Lee; Anping Xie; Anne F King; Annie Voskertchian; Sybil A Klaus; Michelle M Smith; Marlene R Miller; Elizabeth A Colantuoni; James C Fackler; Aaron M Milstone Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2018-10-16
Authors: Lauren D Booth; Anna C Sick-Samuels; Aaron M Milstone; James C Fackler; Lindsey K Gnazzo; David C Stockwell Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2021-08-26
Authors: Charlotte Z Woods-Hill; Danielle W Koontz; Annie Voskertchian; Anping Xie; Judy Shea; Marlene R Miller; James C Fackler; Aaron M Milstone Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.971
Authors: Anping Xie; Danielle W Koontz; Annie Voskertchian; James C Fackler; Aaron M Milstone; Charlotte Z Woods-Hill Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2020-04-09
Authors: Charlotte Z Woods-Hill; Anping Xie; John Lin; Heather A Wolfe; Alex S Plattner; Sara Malone; Kathleen Chiotos; Julia E Szymczak Journal: JAC Antimicrob Resist Date: 2022-01-22