| Literature DB >> 31701480 |
Shigeo Fuji1,2, Saiko Kurosawa3, Yoshihiro Inamoto3, Tatsunori Murata4, Atae Utsunomiya5, Kaoru Uchimaru6, Satoshi Yamasaki7, Yoshitaka Inoue8, Yukiyoshi Moriuchi9, Ilseung Choi10, Masao Ogata11, Michihiro Hidaka12, Takuhiro Yamaguchi13, Takahiro Fukuda3.
Abstract
Patients with aggressive adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) have dismal outcomes with intensive chemotherapy. Early up-front allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is generally recommended. However, the choice of stem cell source, i.e., unrelated bone marrow transplant (UBMT) or cord blood transplantation (CBT), when an HLA-matched related donor is unavailable remains controversial. Thus, we undertook a decision analysis to compare the outcomes of two therapeutic strategies: chemotherapy followed by up-front UBMT at 6 months, and chemotherapy followed by up-front CBT at 3 months. Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups according to the modified ATL-prognostic index. The model simulated life expectancy (LE) and quality-adjusted LE (QALE). LE following up-front UBMT was higher than that following up-front CBT in the low-risk group (2.63 vs. 2.28 years), but was comparable in the intermediate- (2.06 vs. 2.01 years) and high-risk groups (1.25 vs. 1.30 years). The Monte Carlo simulation for LE and QALE in each risk group showed that there was significant uncertainty in all categories. In conclusion, up-front UBMT was superior to up-front CBT in the low-risk group, but the strategies were comparable in the intermediate- and high-risk groups.Entities:
Keywords: ATL; Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma; Decision analysis; Prognostic index; Transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31701480 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-019-02777-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hematol ISSN: 0925-5710 Impact factor: 2.490