Literature DB >> 31701361

The use of in vivo confocal microscopy to track treatment success in fungal keratitis and to differentiate between Fusarium and Aspergillus keratitis.

Seyed Ali Tabatabaei1, Mohammad Soleimani2, Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei1, Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad1, Niloufar Valipour1, Shahram Mahmoudi3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of serial in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) examinations to measure hyphal density for monitoring the treatment success among patients with fungal keratitis, and to compare the hyphal diameter as well as branching angle as a way of differentiation between Aspergillus and Fusarium species observed in IVCM. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from February 2015 to September 2016. Hyphal diameter, density and branching angle measurements were performed using IVCM at admission and on a weekly basis for at least 2 weeks after the start of treatment.
RESULTS: During the period of study, 65 patients with culture-confirmed fungal keratitis were recruited. Of them, 40 were culture-positive for Fusarium spp. and 25 patients for Aspergillus spp. Before the start of treatment, the mean branching angle did not differ between the two species and the mean hyphal diameter was statistically higher for Aspergillus spp. (p = 0.029). Two weeks after the start of treatment, the mean hyphal diameter was statistically lower (p < 0.001) in the treatment failure group. Also the hyphal density significantly decreased with successful treatment (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Decreasing hyphal density in serial IVCMs might be used as an indicator to predict the successful response of fungal ulcers to treatment. Branching angle is not different between Aspergillus and Fusarium keratitis. The mean hyphal diameter is significantly lower in the treatment failure group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspergillus; Diagnosis; Fungal keratitis; Fusarium; In vivo confocal microscopy; Keratitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31701361     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-019-01209-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  17 in total

1.  Diagnosis of Aspergillus keratitis in vivo with confocal microscopy.

Authors:  K Winchester; W D Mathers; J E Sutphin
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Spectrum of fungal keratitis: clinicopathologic study of 44 cases.

Authors:  Rajpal Singh Punia; Reetu Kundu; Jagdish Chander; Sudesh Kumar Arya; Uma Handa; Harsh Mohan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  A 5-year retrospective review of fungal keratitis in the region of Cap Bon.

Authors:  W Zbiba; A Baba; E Bouayed; N Abdessalem; A Daldoul
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 0.818

4.  In vivo confocal microscopy in fungal keratitis.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Brasnu; Tristan Bourcier; Bénédicte Dupas; Sandrine Degorge; Thibault Rodallec; Laurent Laroche; Vincent Borderie; Christophe Baudouin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Fungal keratitis: emerging trends and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Sandhya A Iyer; Sonal S Tuli; Ryan C Wagoner
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.018

6.  Confocal microscopy of Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis.

Authors:  A M Avunduk; R W Beuerman; E D Varnell; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Discrepancy between histology and culture in filamentous fungal infections.

Authors:  Shinwon Lee; Na Ra Yun; Kye-Hyung Kim; Jae Hyun Jeon; Eui-Chong Kim; Doo Hyun Chung; Wan Beom Park; Myoung-Don Oh
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Association between in vitro susceptibility to natamycin and voriconazole and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis.

Authors:  Catherine Q Sun; Prajna Lalitha; N Venkatesh Prajna; Rajarathinam Karpagam; Manoharan Geetha; Kieran S O'Brien; Catherine E Oldenburg; Kathryn J Ray; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Mycotic keratitis: an overview of diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  P K Shukla; M Kumar; G B S Keshava
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.377

Review 10.  Fungal keratitis: An overview of clinical and laboratory aspects.

Authors:  Shahram Mahmoudi; Ahmad Masoomi; Kazem Ahmadikia; Seyed Ali Tabatabaei; Mohammad Soleimani; Sassan Rezaie; Hossein Ghahvechian; Ali Banafsheafshan
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.377

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Fungal keratitis: Mechanisms of infection and management strategies.

Authors:  Christopher Donovan; Eduardo Arenas; Ramesh S Ayyala; Curtis E Margo; Edgar M Espana
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 6.197

2.  Isorhamnetin Ameliorates Aspergillus fumigatus Keratitis by Reducing Fungal Load, Inhibiting Pattern-Recognition Receptors and Inflammatory Cytokines.

Authors:  Xue Tian; Xudong Peng; Jing Lin; Yingxue Zhang; Lu Zhan; Jiao Yin; Ranran Zhang; Guiqiu Zhao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.