Monira I Aldhahi1,2, Andrew A Guccione1, Lisa M K Chin3, Joshua Woolstenhulme4, Randall E Keyser5. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 3. Rehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Gerorge Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. 5. Department of Rehabilitation Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. rkeyser@gmu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize left ventricular diastolic function during an exertional challenge in adults with incomplete cervical spinal cord Injury (icSCI). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a two-group convenience sample was used to compare left ventricular LV diastolic performance during a 5-10 W·min-1 incremental arm ergometer exercise protocol, using bioimpedance cardiography. Subjects were eight males with cervical incomplete spinal cord injury (icSCI; C5-C7: age 39 ± 14 years) versus eight able-bodied males (CON: age 38 ± 13 years). Left ventricular (LV) diastolic indices included end-diastolic volume (EDV) and early diastolic filling ratio (EDFR). LV ejection time (LVET), inotropic index (dZ/dT2) and stroke volume (SV) were compared between the groups at peak exercise, and maximum workload for the icSCI group (isomax). RESULTS: EDV (at peak exercise:131.4 ± 7.3 vs 188.78 ± 9.4, p < 0.001; at isomax: 131.4 ± 7.3 vs 169 ± 23, p = 0.0009) and EDFR (at peak exercise 73 ± 14% vs 119 ± 11%, p = 0.006; at isomax 94 ± 10; p = 0.009) were significantly reduced in icSCI compared to CON, respectively. Significant differences in LVET (icSCI: 273 ± 48 vs CON: 305 ± 68; p = 0.1) and dZ/dT2 (icSCI: 0.64 ± 0.11 vs CON: 0.85 ± 0.31; p = 0.1) were not observed at isomax, despite a significant decrease in SV in the subjects with icSCI (77.1 ± 6.05 mL vs 105.8 ± 9.2 mL, p < 0.00) CONCLUSION: Left ventricular filling was impaired in the subjects with icSCI as evidenced at both peak exercise and isomax. It is likely that restrictions on the skeletal muscle pump mechanized the impairment but increased left ventricular wall stiffness could not be excluded as a mediator.
PURPOSE: To characterize left ventricular diastolic function during an exertional challenge in adults with incomplete cervical spinal cord Injury (icSCI). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a two-group convenience sample was used to compare left ventricular LV diastolic performance during a 5-10 W·min-1 incremental arm ergometer exercise protocol, using bioimpedance cardiography. Subjects were eight males with cervical incomplete spinal cord injury (icSCI; C5-C7: age 39 ± 14 years) versus eight able-bodied males (CON: age 38 ± 13 years). Left ventricular (LV) diastolic indices included end-diastolic volume (EDV) and early diastolic filling ratio (EDFR). LV ejection time (LVET), inotropic index (dZ/dT2) and stroke volume (SV) were compared between the groups at peak exercise, and maximum workload for the icSCI group (isomax). RESULTS: EDV (at peak exercise:131.4 ± 7.3 vs 188.78 ± 9.4, p < 0.001; at isomax: 131.4 ± 7.3 vs 169 ± 23, p = 0.0009) and EDFR (at peak exercise 73 ± 14% vs 119 ± 11%, p = 0.006; at isomax 94 ± 10; p = 0.009) were significantly reduced in icSCI compared to CON, respectively. Significant differences in LVET (icSCI: 273 ± 48 vs CON: 305 ± 68; p = 0.1) and dZ/dT2 (icSCI: 0.64 ± 0.11 vs CON: 0.85 ± 0.31; p = 0.1) were not observed at isomax, despite a significant decrease in SV in the subjects with icSCI (77.1 ± 6.05 mL vs 105.8 ± 9.2 mL, p < 0.00) CONCLUSION: Left ventricular filling was impaired in the subjects with icSCI as evidenced at both peak exercise and isomax. It is likely that restrictions on the skeletal muscle pump mechanized the impairment but increased left ventricular wall stiffness could not be excluded as a mediator.
Authors: Rodrigo Nazário Leão; Pedro Marques Silva; Luísa Branco; Helena Fonseca; Bruno Bento; Marta Alves; Daniel Virella; Roberto Palma Reis Journal: Clin Hypertens Date: 2017-12-27