Literature DB >> 31701254

An artificial neural network ensemble approach to generate air pollution maps.

S Van Roode1, J J Ruiz-Aguilar2, J González-Enrique3, I J Turias3.   

Abstract

The objective of this research is to propose an artificial neural network (ANN) ensemble in order to estimate the hourly NO2 concentration at unsampled locations. Spatial interpolation methods and linear regression models with regularization have been compared to perform the ensemble. The study case is based on the region of the Bay of Algeciras (Spain). This area is very industrialized and presents high concentrations of traffic. Air pollution data has been collected from the monitoring network maintained by the Andalusian Government in the region. On one hand, two totally different methods have been used and compared such as inverse distance weight (IDW) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) in order to generate maps of pollutant concentration values. On the other hand, an ensemble approach has been developed using the outputs of the previous models. The ensemble is based on an ANN with backpropagation learning. An experimental procedure using cross-validation has been applied in order to compare the different models based on several performance indexes (R correlation coefficient, MSE, MAE and d index of fitness) and together to Friedman test and Bonferroni correction. The results reveal that the proposed ensemble approach presents better performance than single models in general terms. A validation procedure has been conducted using a leave-one-out strategy using each monitoring station. IDW method presents an average value of R equals 0.72 and a maximum R equals 0.87, a minimum MSE equals 78.00, a minimum MAE equals 5.841 and a maximum d equals 0.913. LASSO presents an average value of R equals 0.76 and a maximum R equals 0.86, a minimum MSE equals 59.13, a minimum MAE equals 5.490 and a maximum d equals 0.900. Finally, the ANN ensemble shows an average value of R equals 0.77 and a maximum R equals 0.87, a minimum MSE equals 54.05, a minimum MAE equals 4.972 and a maximum d equals 0.915. The main objective has been to produce adequate atmospheric pollutant concentration maps and, therefore, to obtain estimations for locations that are distinct to the monitoring stations. Another objective has been to have in hand a system to produce robust measurements. This kind of system could be useful for missing data imputation and to find out reading errors (i.e. unexpected deviations or calibration problems) in some of the nodes of a network.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution maps; Artificial neural networks; Ensemble; IDW; LASSO

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31701254     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7901-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  12 in total

1.  Mapping of background air pollution at a fine spatial scale across the European Union.

Authors:  Rob Beelen; Gerard Hoek; Edzer Pebesma; Danielle Vienneau; Kees de Hoogh; David J Briggs
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-01-18       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability.

Authors:  Camilo Mora; Abby G Frazier; Ryan J Longman; Rachel S Dacks; Maya M Walton; Eric J Tong; Joseph J Sanchez; Lauren R Kaiser; Yuko O Stender; James M Anderson; Christine M Ambrosino; Iria Fernandez-Silva; Louise M Giuseffi; Thomas W Giambelluca
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A site-optimised multi-scale GIS based land use regression model for simulating local scale patterns in air pollution.

Authors:  Xuying Ma; Ian Longley; Jay Gao; Ayushi Kachhara; Jennifer Salmond
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  A hybrid model for spatiotemporal forecasting of PM2.5 based on graph convolutional neural network and long short-term memory.

Authors:  Yanlin Qi; Qi Li; Hamed Karimian; Di Liu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Probabilistic forecasting for extreme NO2 pollution episodes.

Authors:  José L Aznarte
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Comparison of the accuracy of kriging and IDW interpolations in estimating groundwater arsenic concentrations in Texas.

Authors:  Gordon Gong; Sravan Mattevada; Sid E O'Bryant
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  A land use regression model for explaining spatial variation in air pollution levels using a wind sector based approach.

Authors:  O Naughton; A Donnelly; P Nolan; F Pilla; B D Misstear; B Broderick
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Prediction models of CO, SPM and SO(2) concentrations in the Campo de Gibraltar Region, Spain: a multiple comparison strategy.

Authors:  Ignacio J Turias; Francisco J González; Ma Luz Martin; Pedro L Galindo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Prediction of CO maximum ground level concentrations in the Bay of Algeciras, Spain using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  M L Martín; I J Turias; F J González; P L Galindo; F J Trujillo; C G Puntonet; J M Gorriz
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Health effects of ambient air pollution: do different methods for estimating exposure lead to different results?

Authors:  Yann Sellier; Julien Galineau; Agnes Hulin; Fabrice Caini; Nathalie Marquis; Vladislav Navel; Sebastien Bottagisi; Lise Giorgis-Allemand; Claire Jacquier; Remy Slama; Johanna Lepeule
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 9.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.