Literature DB >> 31700693

Simultaneous cotargeting of ATR and RNA Polymerase I transcription demonstrates synergistic antileukemic effects on acute myeloid leukemia.

Tingting Wang1, Margaret Shatara2,3, Fangbing Liu1, Tristan Knight2,3, Holly Edwards4,5, Guan Wang1, Hai Lin6, Yue Wang7, Jeffrey W Taub2,5, Yubin Ge3,4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug development; Haematological cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 31700693      PMCID: PMC6823485          DOI: 10.1038/s41392-019-0076-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther        ISSN: 2059-3635


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Continued development of novel therapeutic agents is critical to improve the survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). RNA Polymerase I (Pol I)-mediated transcription and ribosomal biogenesis become dysregulated, thereby allowing synthesis of necessary substrates to support uncontrolled cancer cell proliferation[1]. The Pol I transcription rate is higher in AML cells than nonleukemic myeloid precursors[2], suggesting Pol I transcription as a therapeutic target for AML. CX-5461 is a potent Pol I transcription inhibitor and stabilizer of the DNA G-quadruplex structure, which causes G2/M-phase arrest via the ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein)-mediated DNA damage response (DDR)[3-5]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the ATR-selective inhibitor AZD6738 would synergistically enhance CX-5461-induced cell death via abolishment of the ATR-mediated DDR. To begin to test our hypothesis, we evaluated apoptosis induction by CX-5461 in AML cell lines. Consistent with previous reports, CX-5461 induced apoptosis at least partially through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway (Fig. S1a–g) and was independent of TP53 status (Fig. S1h)[6]. Compared with monotherapy, combination treatment of AML cell lines with CX-5461 and AZD6738 for 48 h induced significantly increased apoptosis, as reflected by enhanced Annexin V positivity and substantially increased caspase 3 and PARP cleavage (Figs. 1a, b and S2). Synergistic antileukemic interaction was indicated by combination index (CI) values of <0.77. The combination significantly induced apoptosis within 8 h of drug exposure, exceeding that induced by monotherapy in U937 cells (Fig. 1c). CX-5461 treatment for 24 h caused substantial G2/M-phase arrest (Fig. 1d), while AZD6738 did not appear to induce a major effect. The combination treatment prevented CX-5461-induced G2/M-phase arrest and substantially increased the population of sub-G1 cells (dead cells). Both monotherapy and combination therapy with AZD6738 downregulated CHK-1 protein expression. Combination treatment decreased phosphorylated CDC25C (p-CDC25C) 8–12 h after treatment initiation. CX-5461 caused a time-dependent increase in phosphorylated CDK1 (p-CDK1), which was abolished by combination treatment (Fig. 1e). Similar results were obtained in CTS cells (Fig. S3a–c). In addition, treatment with CX-5461 plus the CHK-1-selective inhibitor LY2603618 abolished CX-5461-induced G2/M-phase arrest and synergistically induced cell death (Fig. S3d and e). Taken together, these findings confirm that AZD6738 synergizes with CX-5461 via abolishment of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint arrest.
Fig. 1

The AML cell lines CTS and U937 and primary AML patient samples were treated with CX-5461 (CX) or AZD6738 (AZD), alone or in combination, for up to 48 h.

a, c, j Treated cells were subjected to Annexin V-FITC/PI staining and flow cytometry analyses. b, e, f, i Western blots of whole-cell lysates are shown. Fold changes as determined by densitometry with normalization to β-actin, are displayed below each blot. d Cell cycle progression was determined by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry analyses. g Chromatin-bound and soluble fractions of RPA32 and γH2AX were analyzed by Western blotting. Fold changes as determined by densitometry, were normalized to histone H4. h Representative visualizations of alkaline comet assays are shown (left panel). The results are plotted as the median percentage of DNA in each comet “tail” of four replicates ± SEM (right panel). * indicates p < 0.01 and *** indicates p < 0.001 (paired two-sample t test). CI: combination index, as determined by using CompuSyn software; cf-caspase 3: cleaved caspase 3; cf-PARP: cleaved PARP

The AML cell lines CTS and U937 and primary AML patient samples were treated with CX-5461 (CX) or AZD6738 (AZD), alone or in combination, for up to 48 h.

a, c, j Treated cells were subjected to Annexin V-FITC/PI staining and flow cytometry analyses. b, e, f, i Western blots of whole-cell lysates are shown. Fold changes as determined by densitometry with normalization to β-actin, are displayed below each blot. d Cell cycle progression was determined by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry analyses. g Chromatin-bound and soluble fractions of RPA32 and γH2AX were analyzed by Western blotting. Fold changes as determined by densitometry, were normalized to histone H4. h Representative visualizations of alkaline comet assays are shown (left panel). The results are plotted as the median percentage of DNA in each comet “tail” of four replicates ± SEM (right panel). * indicates p < 0.01 and *** indicates p < 0.001 (paired two-sample t test). CI: combination index, as determined by using CompuSyn software; cf-caspase 3: cleaved caspase 3; cf-PARP: cleaved PARP Next, we evaluated the effects of these two agents on DNA damage in U937 cells. CX-5461 treatment induced γH2AX at 4 h, while enhancement of γH2AX by the combination was noted starting at 8 h. Within 12 h, AZD6738 increased γH2AX (Fig. 1f). An increase in chromatin-bound RPA32 and γH2AX, indicative of DNA replication stress and damage[7], was detected after 8 h of combined treatment compared with single-drug treatment (Fig. 1g). The alkaline comet assay results showed a significant increase in the percentage of DNA present in the comet “tail” under combination treatment (Fig. 1h). Similar results were obtained in CTS cells (Fig. S4a–c). Taken together, these results show that CX-5461 and AZD6738 cooperatively induce DNA replication stress and damage in AML cells. We previously demonstrated that the ATR inhibitor AZ20 causes downregulation of ribonucleotide reductase (RR, a key enzyme in the synthesis of dNDPs) subunits M1 (RRM1) and M2 (RRM2)[8]. Interestingly, CX-5461 treatment increased RRM2 protein expression 8 h post drug treatment, and this increase was abolished by the addition of AZD6738 (Fig. 1i). The RRM1 protein level was largely unchanged, though its downregulation at 24 h was likely due to cell death. Treatment with the RR inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU) significantly enhanced CX-5461-induced cell death (Fig. S4e). Similar results were obtained in CTS cells (Fig. S4d and e). These results show that downregulation of RRM2 likely plays an important role in the synergy between CX-5461 and AZD6738. Primary AML patient samples (Table S1 shows the patient characteristics) were significantly more sensitive to CX-5461 than normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs; p = 0.007, paired two-sample t test), as measured by MTT assays. The AZD6738 IC50s of the patient samples showed substantial overlap with those of the healthy controls (p = 0.217, paired two-sample t test; Fig. S5a, right panel). MTT assays and standard isobologram analyses revealed substantial synergy between CX-5461 and AZD6738 in 10 primary AML patient samples ex vivo (Fig. S5b), which was further confirmed via Annexin V/PI staining and flow cytometry analyses of primary samples from three AML patients for whom adequate blasts were available (Fig. 1j). The combination also showed a synergistic effect in three normal PBMC samples, raising concerns about its potential toxicity (Fig. S5c). However, the sensitivity of primary AML cells greatly exceeded that of normal PBMCs, implying the existence of a therapeutic window. In summary, our results show that CX-5461 induces DNA damage and ATR activation. ATR has been reported to suppress DNA damage by promoting RRM2 expression[7]. Thus, activation of ATR upregulates RRM2 to aid in the repair of damaged DNA. Therefore, ATR inhibition abolishes the G2/M cell cycle arrest and prevents RRM2 upregulation, decreasing dNTP pools and resulting in the accumulation of damaged DNA and cell death. Our findings support further investigation into the efficacy of CX-5461 in combination with AZD6738 for the treatment of AML. Supplemental File
  8 in total

1.  RNA Polymerase I Inhibition with CX-5461 as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy to Target MYC in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Hans C Lee; Hua Wang; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Heather Lin; Jin He; Richard J Jones; Isere Kuiatse; Dongmin Gu; Zhiqiang Wang; Wencai Ma; John Lim; Sean O'Brien; Jonathan Keats; Jing Yang; Richard E Davis; Robert Z Orlowski
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Targeting RNA polymerase I with an oral small molecule CX-5461 inhibits ribosomal RNA synthesis and solid tumor growth.

Authors:  Denis Drygin; Amy Lin; Josh Bliesath; Caroline B Ho; Sean E O'Brien; Chris Proffitt; Mayuko Omori; Mustapha Haddach; Michael K Schwaebe; Adam Siddiqui-Jain; Nicole Streiner; Jaclyn E Quin; Elaine Sanij; Megan J Bywater; Ross D Hannan; David Ryckman; Kenna Anderes; William G Rice
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  The RNA polymerase I transcription machinery: an emerging target for the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Denis Drygin; William G Rice; Ingrid Grummt
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Inhibition of Pol I transcription treats murine and human AML by targeting the leukemia-initiating cell population.

Authors:  Nadine Hein; Donald P Cameron; Katherine M Hannan; Nhu-Y N Nguyen; Chun Yew Fong; Jirawas Sornkom; Meaghan Wall; Megan Pavy; Carleen Cullinane; Jeannine Diesch; Jennifer R Devlin; Amee J George; Elaine Sanij; Jaclyn Quin; Gretchen Poortinga; Inge Verbrugge; Adele Baker; Denis Drygin; Simon J Harrison; James D Rozario; Jason A Powell; Stuart M Pitson; Johannes Zuber; Ricky W Johnstone; Mark A Dawson; Mark A Guthridge; Andrew Wei; Grant A McArthur; Richard B Pearson; Ross D Hannan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase.

Authors:  Rémi Buisson; Jessica L Boisvert; Cyril H Benes; Lee Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  rRNA synthesis inhibitor, CX-5461, activates ATM/ATR pathway in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, arrests cells in G2 phase and induces apoptosis.

Authors:  Sandeep S Negi; Patrick Brown
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-07-20

7.  Transient rRNA synthesis inhibition with CX-5461 is sufficient to elicit growth arrest and cell death in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells.

Authors:  Sandeep S Negi; Patrick Brown
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-27

8.  Mechanisms responsible for the synergistic antileukemic interactions between ATR inhibition and cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia cells.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Xinyu Li; Yongwei Su; Jianyun Zhao; Daniel A Luedtke; Valeria Epshteyn; Holly Edwards; Guan Wang; Zhihong Wang; Roland Chu; Jeffrey W Taub; Hai Lin; Yue Wang; Yubin Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Synergistic Antitumor Effects Exploited from the Inhibition of Ataxia Telangiectasia and RAD3-Related Protein Kinase (ATR).

Authors:  Li-Wei Wang; Songwei Jiang; Ying-Hui Yuan; Jilong Duan; Nian-Dong Mao; Zi Hui; Renren Bai; Tian Xie; Xiang-Yang Ye
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Enhancing the antitumor activity of an engineered TRAIL-coated oncolytic adenovirus for treating acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Xianghui Yu; Zixuan Wang; Wenmo Liu; Lizheng Wang; Peng Gao; Zhe Li; Jiaxin Wu; Haihong Zhang; Hui Wu; Wei Kong
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-04-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.