| Literature DB >> 31698552 |
So Hyeon Park1, Yoo Sung Song2, Byung Seok Moon3, Byung Chul Lee2, Hyun Soo Park1,2, Sang Eun Kim1,2,4.
Abstract
Synaptic dopamine (DA) is mainly regulated by the presynaptic DA transporter (DAT). Single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) with the DAT radiotracer [123I]FP-CIT assesses changes in synaptic DA availability when endogenous DA displaces [123I]FP-CIT or competes for DAT. Here, we investigated the effects of haloperidol (HAL) and clozapine (CLZ) on [123I]FP-CIT binding in the rat striatum and midbrain to assess the utility of [123I]FP-CIT SPECT to quantify changes in synaptic DA availability. Rats underwent [123I]FP-CIT SPECT after intraperitoneal administration of normal saline (vehicle), HAL (1 and 7 mg/kg), CLZ (10 and 54 mg/kg) and bupropion (BUP, a DAT blocker, 20 and 100 mg/kg). In the striatum and midbrain, percent differences in the nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) of [123I]FP-CIT compared to the vehicle were calculated for the various drugs and doses. In another experiment, changes in endogenous striatal DA concentration were measured by in vivo microdialysis under the conditions used in the SPECT study. BUP dose-dependently occupied DAT at considerable levels. Compared to the vehicle, HAL decreased [123I]FP-CIT BPND in the striatum (-25.29% and -2.27% for 1 and 7 mg/kg, respectively) and to a greater degree in the midbrain (-58.74% and -49.64% for 1 and 7 mg/kg, respectively), whereas the CLZ-treated group showed a decrease in the midbrain (-38.60% and -40.38% for 10 and 54 mg/kg, respectively) but an increase in the striatum (18.85% and 38.64% for 10 and 54 mg/kg, respectively). Antipsychotic-induced changes in endogenous striatal DA concentrations varied across drugs and doses. The data demonstrate that [123I]FP-CIT SPECT may be a useful preclinical technique for detecting increases in synaptic DA availability in the midbrain and striatum in response to HAL, with results comparable to those of in vivo microdialysis.Entities:
Keywords: Clozapine; Dopamine availability; Haloperidol; In vivo microdialysis; [¹²³I]FP-CIT SPECT
Year: 2019 PMID: 31698552 PMCID: PMC6844836 DOI: 10.5607/en.2019.28.5.602
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Neurobiol ISSN: 1226-2560 Impact factor: 3.261
Fig. 1Group mean (n=5 per drug and dose condition) BPND parametric images comparing changes in [123I]FP-CIT BPND in the striatum (A) and midbrain (B) after treatment with BUP, HAL and CLZ. These changes are also summarized in graphs (C). VEH, BUP, HAL and CLZ represent the vehicle-, bupropion-, haloperidol- and clozapine-treated groups. The low and high doses of HAL, CLZ and BUP were 1 and 7 mg/kg body weight, 10 and 54 mg/kg body weight, and 20 and 100 mg/kg body weight, respectively. Values are the mean±SEM. White lines overlaid on the SPECT images of the striatum (A) and midbrain (B) for the vehicle-treated group show the margin of each region.
Differences in [123I]FP-CIT BPND
| Drug | Dose (mg/kg) | Striatum | Midbrain | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| BPND | % Difference | p | BPND | % Difference | p | ||
| VEH | - | 1.64±0.13 | - | - | 1.69±0.32 | - | - |
| BUP | 20 | 1.37±0.22 | −16.50±13.41 | 0.3954 | 1.16±0.16 | −31.57±9.26 | 0.2165 |
| 100 | 0.72±0.08 | −56.29±4.59 | 0.0006 | 0.79±0.12 | −53.08±7.21 | 0.0376 | |
| HAL | 1 | 1.22±0.09 | −25.29±5.60 | 0.0749 | 0.70±0.12 | −58.74±7.38 | 0.0041 |
| 7 | 1.60±0.06 | −2.27±3.65 | 0.9797 | 0.85±0.05 | −49.64±3.13 | 0.0215 | |
| CLZ | 10 | 1.95±0.20 | 18.85±12.00 | 0.2257 | 1.04±0.11 | −38.60±6.53 | 0.0668 |
| 54 | 2.27±0.13 | 38.64±7.87 | 0.0061 | 1.01±0.05 | −40.38±2.76 | 0.0676 | |
Values are the mean±SEM. VEH, vehicle; BUP, bupropion; HAL, haloperidol; CLZ, clozapine.
Fig. 2Time course of the effects of HAL (A) and CLZ (C) treatment on DA release in the rat striatum (n=5 per drug and dose condition). Time-averaged (from the time of drug treatment to the end of the study) percentage changes from baseline for each dose of HAL (B) and CLZ (D). HAL and CLZ represent the haloperidol- and clozapine-treated groups. The low and high doses of HAL and CLZ were 1 and 7 mg/kg body weight and 10 and 54 mg/kg body weight, respectively. The value is designated as 0% at time 0, and drugs were treated at time=0 min. Values are the mean±SEM.
Fig. 3Relationship between percentage differences in [123I] FP-CIT BPND (x-axis) and time-averaged percentage changes from baseline extracellular DA concentration (y-axis) after treatment with varying doses of HAL and CLZ. HAL and CLZ represent the haloperidol- and clozapine-treated groups. The low and high doses of HAL and CLZ were 1 and 7 mg/kg body weight and 10 and 54 mg/kg body weight, respectively. Values are the mean±SEM.