Literature DB >> 31698336

Evaluation of Step-Counting Interventions Differing on Intensity Messages.

Catrine Tudor-Locke, John M Schuna, Damon L Swift, Amber T Dragg, Allison B Davis, Corby K Martin, William D Johnson, Timothy S Church.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Step-counting interventions with discrepant intensity emphases may elicit different effects.
METHODS: A total of 120 sedentary/low-active, postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to one of the following 3 groups: (1) 10,000 steps per day (with no emphasis on walking intensity/speed/cadence; basic intervention, 49 completers), (2) 10,000 steps per day and at least 30 minutes in moderate intensity (ie, at a cadence of at least 100 steps per minute; enhanced intervention, 47 completers), or (3) a control group (19 completers). NL-1000-determined steps and active minutes (a device-specific indicator of time at moderate+ intensity) were collected as process variables during the 12-week intervention. Outcome variables included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, anthropometric measurements, fasting blood glucose and insulin, flow-mediated dilation, gait speed, and ActiGraph GT3X+-determined physical activity and sedentary behavior.
RESULTS: The "basic group" increased 5173 to 9602 steps per day and 9.2 to 30.2 active minutes per day. The "enhanced group" similarly increased 5061 to 10,508 steps per day and 8.7 to 38.8 active minutes per day. The only significant change over time for clinical variables was body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that use simple step-counters can achieve elevated volume and intensity of daily physical activity, regardless of emphasis on intensity. Despite this, few clinical outcomes were apparent in this sample of postmenopausal women with generally normal or controlled hypertension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometry; exercise; pedometry; physical activity

Year:  2020        PMID: 31698336     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  5 in total

1.  Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations.

Authors:  Emma Norris; Isra Sulevani; Ailbhe N Finnerty; Oscar Castro
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Walking for hypertension.

Authors:  Ling-Ling Lee; Caroline A Mulvaney; Yoko Kin Yoke Wong; Edwin Sy Chan; Michael C Watson; Hui-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-24

3.  The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults.

Authors:  Umar A R Chaudhry; Charlotte Wahlich; Rebecca Fortescue; Derek G Cook; Rachel Knightly; Tess Harris
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Push-Rate Threshold for Physical Activity Intensity in Persons Who Use Manual Wheelchairs.

Authors:  Ian M Rice; Brenda Jeng; Stephanie L Silveira; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Number of steps and systolic blood pressure: Do work and leisure matter?

Authors:  Patrick Crowley; Nidhi Gupta; Nicolas Vuillerme; Pascal Madeleine; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.645

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.