Literature DB >> 31697361

Evaluation of an automatic article selection method for timelier updates of the Comet Core Outcome Set database.

Christopher R Norman1, Elizabeth Gargon2, Mariska M G Leeflang3, Aurélie Névéol1, Paula R Williamson2.   

Abstract

Curated databases of scientific literature play an important role in helping researchers find relevant literature, but populating such databases is a labour intensive and time-consuming process. One such database is the freely accessible Comet Core Outcome Set database, which was originally populated using manual screening in an annually updated systematic review. In order to reduce the workload and facilitate more timely updates we are evaluating machine learning methods to reduce the number of references needed to screen. In this study we have evaluated a machine learning approach based on logistic regression to automatically rank the candidate articles. Data from the original systematic review and its four first review updates were used to train the model and evaluate performance. We estimated that using automatic screening would yield a workload reduction of at least 75% while keeping the number of missed references around 2%. We judged this to be an acceptable trade-off for this systematic review, and the method is now being used for the next round of the Comet database update.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31697361      PMCID: PMC6836711          DOI: 10.1093/database/baz109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Database (Oxford)        ISSN: 1758-0463            Impact factor:   3.451


  16 in total

1.  Integrating text mining into the MGI biocuration workflow.

Authors:  K G Dowell; M S McAndrews-Hill; D P Hill; H J Drabkin; J A Blake
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  The Protein-Protein Interaction tasks of BioCreative III: classification/ranking of articles and linking bio-ontology concepts to full text.

Authors:  Martin Krallinger; Miguel Vazquez; Florian Leitner; David Salgado; Andrew Chatr-Aryamontri; Andrew Winter; Livia Perfetto; Leonardo Briganti; Luana Licata; Marta Iannuccelli; Luisa Castagnoli; Gianni Cesareni; Mike Tyers; Gerold Schneider; Fabio Rinaldi; Robert Leaman; Graciela Gonzalez; Sergio Matos; Sun Kim; W John Wilbur; Luis Rocha; Hagit Shatkay; Ashish V Tendulkar; Shashank Agarwal; Feifan Liu; Xinglong Wang; Rafal Rak; Keith Noto; Charles Elkan; Zhiyong Lu; Rezarta Islamaj Dogan; Jean-Fred Fontaine; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches.

Authors:  Alison O'Mara-Eves; James Thomas; John McNaught; Makoto Miwa; Sophia Ananiadou
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-14

4.  Collating the knowledge base for core outcome set development: developing and appraising the search strategy for a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gargon; Paula R Williamson; Mike Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 5.  Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Katherine Davis; Sarah L Gorst; Nicola Harman; Valerie Smith; Elizabeth Gargon; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Sean Tunis; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systematic review automation technologies.

Authors:  Guy Tsafnat; Paul Glasziou; Miew Keen Choong; Adam Dunn; Filippo Galgani; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-09

7.  Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).

Authors:  Elaine Beller; Justin Clark; Guy Tsafnat; Clive Adams; Heinz Diehl; Hans Lund; Mourad Ouzzani; Kristina Thayer; James Thomas; Tari Turner; Jun Xia; Karen Robinson; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-19

8.  Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study.

Authors:  Piotr Przybyła; Austin J Brockmeier; Georgios Kontonatsios; Marie-Annick Le Pogam; John McNaught; Erik von Elm; Kay Nolan; Sophia Ananiadou
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.273

9.  Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.

Authors:  Alexandra Bannach-Brown; Piotr Przybyła; James Thomas; Andrew S C Rice; Sophia Ananiadou; Jing Liao; Malcolm Robert Macleod
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-15

10.  Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah L Gorst; Nicola L Harman; Valerie Smith; Karen Matvienko-Sikar; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah L Gorst; Karen Matvienko-Sikar; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah L Gorst; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Developing an online, searchable database to systematically map and organise current literature on retention research (ORRCA2).

Authors:  Anna Kearney; Polly-Anna Ashford; Laura Butlin; Thomas Conway; William J Cragg; Declan Devane; Heidi Gardner; Daisy M Gaunt; Katie Gillies; Nicola L Harman; Andrew Hunter; Athene J Lane; Catherine McWilliams; Louise Murphy; Carrie O'Nions; Edward N Stanhope; Akke Vellinga; Paula R Williamson; Carrol Gamble
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.